Do Virus Scanners Slow Down Your System?
Does the presence of a virus scanner guarantee reduced performance, or does it have a negligible impact? We test 10 different products to see if you’re unknowingly suffering with security software.
Single-, Dual-, And Quad-Core Benchmarks
We think it’s important to address one of the variables missing from our previous tests, and that is hardware. As we’ve seen up until this point, most applications don’t seem to show a notable difference in performance, regardless of whether security software is installed or not. But all of the tests have also been run on a dual-core CPU, too. Will the results change on a single- or quad-core processor?
We would expect the raw performance to drop slightly in multithreaded applications. But we're curious about the effect security software has on single-core performance, too. While we don’t have time to run the entire benchmark suite for different processor setups, we run all three CPU options with AVG AntiVirus 9, AVG Internet Security 9, and without any security software installed for a quick test:
While the number of available execution cores can certainly affect the raw results, when it comes to comparing performance on the basis of available compute resources, the only metric that shows a significant performance drop associated with a single-core processor running security software is the time it takes to load Internet pages on the first run. Aside from that, security software doesn’t seem to have an adverse affect on single-core PCs. This is a surprising result, as we expected security software to take advantage of threading. It’s possible that our test scenarios don’t give the software an ideal opportunity to do so, but it’s a surprising result nonetheless.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Single-, Dual-, And Quad-Core Benchmarks
Prev Page Response Time Benchmarks Next Page Conclusion: A Pleasant Surprise-
iam2thecrowe before i read the article, my guess is Norton is the slowest and most useless....Reply -
well from my point of view - antivirus scanner do application loading to take a much longer time and this was proven by your tests.Reply
I think that AV software has no place into todays operating systems except for inexperincied users. I'm investing money to fast SSD disc to improve performace, why the hell intstall AV software to push performance back? -
micr0be talk about heavy modifications on the new set of AVs compared to the older ones ... my surprise is norton which i was expecting to cripple the system to a halt .... very nice article btwReply -
The test rig's CPU looks funny to me.Reply
Athlon II X4 645
3.5 GHz, Quad-Core, 6 MB L3 Cache
Isn't that a Phenom?