ASRock X99 OC Formula/3.1 And Fatal1ty X99 Professional/3.1

Reviews
By
last updated

ASRock’s latest X99 boards fill the budget gap between the high-end and premium motherboard markets, but do their features justify the extra price?

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Firmware

Color is the only visible difference between X99 OC Formula/3.1 and Fatal1ty X99 Professional firmware. Updates for these motherboards are released in tandem, which makes sense when the only hardware difference is the PCIe network controller.

Both boards contain a range of factory-programed LN2 overclocking profiles. Developed by famed overclocking competitor Nick Shih, these range from 5.25 to 5.76 GHz at 1.60V CPU Core and 5.89 to 6.00 GHz at 1.65V CPU Core. All of these profiles use a 1.45V CPU Cache setting and 128 MHz BCLK.

Traditional overclocking profiles include 4.0 GHz at 1.20V, 4.2 GHz at 1.225V, 4.4 GHz at 1.30V and 4.5 GHz at 1.36V. The voltage levels are adequate to stabilize the majority of Haswell-E CPU samples, though many CPU heat spreaders and/or coolers lack the thermal dissipation required to prevent full-load thermal throttling at the highest two settings.

Both of the above firmware screenshots show ASRock’s “Multi Core Enhancement” setting, which disappears when manual multipliers are chosen. This setting overrides Intel’s specified ‘more cores, less Turbo Boost’ power scheme to deliver the CPU’s maximum Intel Turbo Boost ratio regardless of how many cores are deployed. It’s disabled by default and during our benchmark comparisons.

Image 1 of 2

While the X99 OC Formula/3.1 reached 4.40 GHz at 1.28V CPU Core, the Fatal1ty X99 Professional only got to 4.35 GHz. These should have produced identical CPU core overclocks since both the hardware and firmware are virtually identical, save for an uninvolved network controller, and the difference might point to variability between samples (aka “bad luck”). Memory overclocking was far closer to our expectations, with both motherboards pushing stable DDR4-3251 data rates while using 1.33V settings that resulted in 1.35V measurements.

Image 1 of 6

ASRock also provides several DRAM overclocking presets that use such high voltage that they might not work with our processor’s temperamental memory controller. Ditching those for known working values, we find the full range of primary, secondary and tertiary timing menus, along with a few extra related settings.

Image 1 of 2

ASRock decided to break out the CPU’s integrated controller into a separate “FIVR” menu. DRAM voltage is redundant from the DRAM menu.

See more Motherboards Reviews
Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
17 Comments Comment from the forums
  • obababoy
    That gold is beautiful! If X99 wasnt a complete waste of a gamers money I would upgrade my z97 setup.
    Reply
  • MonsterCookie
    I am wondering whether these newer Intel chipsets do actually support the VT-d extensions for virtualization?
    By looking at the board, it is full with PCI-e bridge chips to enhance the number of PCI lanes the CPU can address. However, this trick is a no-go with VT-d, since you need direct access to the hardware, and it cannot sit beyond a PCI-e bridge. I have similar issues with my HP Z800 due to trashy Intel chipset.

    This is why I had to buy a dirty AMD FX8350, because on AMD all features are supported. Otherwise I would have not even poked an AMD system with a 10 foot pole.


    Btw, Tom's.
    WHY ON EARTH does that red arrow at the top of the page occupy half of my screen vertically, and it scrolls down as I scroll down the page so I cannot get rid of it at all?
    You are reviewing tiny 1080p screens, so you should know that occupying 10% of the visible area with a useless arrow is not cool.
    Reply
  • MonsterCookie
    BTW, I forgot to mention that in general Killer NICs pretty much suck. On Linux they often do not work at all, which is tragicomic considering that they actually run an embedded-Linux on the cards embedded-CPU itself.

    Just throw in a good Intel Gigabit NIC, and that will rock with close to theoretical speed, no messing around with drivers, VM-ware, KVM and Xen recognize them too. Try to do that with a "Killer" NIC.
    Reply
  • popatim
    The GAMING Charts shows the CPU as an i7-4790k .

    Oooppssie.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    16348993 said:
    I am wondering whether these newer Intel chipsets do actually support the VT-d extensions for virtualization?
    By looking at the board, it is full with PCI-e bridge chips to enhance the number of PCI lanes the CPU can address.
    No, those aren't bridge chips, they're just the electronic version of a double-pole switch. I don't know how software would even know that they're there. Unlike the bridging switches, there are no extra lanes provided, the platform always gets 40 from a 40-lane CPU or 28 from a 28-lane CPU, and these become "fixed" as soon as the device is installed. The PCH lanes are fixed without having any device installed..
    Reply
  • goinginstyle
    Another sucktastic review. Of course no matter the price ASRock will receive an award, just like MSI always does even with stability and crap software and EFI controls. What is your problem with Asus? You pretended to review the Ramage V Extreme board but really did not go into detail on it. Seems like you have a personal issue with Asus, especially noticing the lack of reviews in the last six months. The Rampage V is a much better product than the two ASRock boards and your opinion about enthusiasts wanting to save money and go with ASRock is laughable at best. You have no clue what enthusiasts want or desire. The two ASRock boards are a joke. Just read the forums and other reviews.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    16353633 said:
    What is your problem with Asus? You pretended to review the Ramage V Extreme board but really did not go into detail on it. Seems like you have a personal issue with Asus, especially noticing the lack of reviews in the last six months.
    Asus sent the Rampage V Extreme specifically for O/C testing, having voiced concern that our value analysis doesn't account for the extra time and expense they put into firmware and software development. A full review would require us to buy our own sample, and we haven't gotten there yet.
    Reply
  • tpovic
    THIS SHOULD BE UNDER ALL MOTHERBOARD TESTS
    so maybe in a few years us not buying this crap they turn around and inovate!

    "As we all know some (if not all) Apple laptops come without a CD drive, some do not have a Ethernet jack (WiFi only), obviously everyone heard about the new laptop with USB 3.1 being the only jack on the laptop.

    I am not saying Intel and motherboard manufacturers need to go to that extreme, but we have reached a point where removing some of these old ports will allow manufacturers to save money and pass them to the buyer.

    Is there really a need for a PS/2 port on a performance motherboard? Why not remove all the USB 2.0 ports and maybe add 2 more USB 3.0 ports.

    I recently purchased a MSI motherboards called GAMING 5, it is a gaming motherboard (duhh), marketed towards people on the gaming/performance side. Obviously anyone buying this board in the retail store is buying it with an intent to play games, and almost no one who games in 2015 uses a VGA or DVI ports, it also has PS/2 port.

    I am paying for these useless features that regular people almost no longer use, let alone gamers or people who are into PC building. You can include a HDMI to VGA or DVI adapter just in case someone out there still needs them.

    I think they need to start removing some of the legacy ports and chips and make boards cleaner, cheaper and more affordable to manufacture and buy."
    Reply
  • RedJaron
    16355398 said:
    Is there really a need for a PS/2 port on a performance motherboard?
    Yes. A lot of gamers still refuse to use anything except a PS/2 keyboard. These are the same type of people who would shell out big money for an extreme gaming rig.

    16355398 said:
    Why not remove all the USB 2.0 ports and maybe add 2 more USB 3.0 ports.
    Because the X99 chipset is limited to six USB3 ports. Often this comes as four ports on the back and one for the front panel header. Adding more USB3 requires an additional USB controller chip and that costs more money. Besides, USB2 handles basic peripherals such as keyboards, mice, printers, scanners, etc more than adequately, so removing them is unnecessary. USB3 is only necessary for external high-speed storage at the moment so there's no reason to think your keyboard and mouse must use USB3.

    16355398 said:
    I recently purchased a MSI motherboards called GAMING 5, it is a gaming motherboard (duhh), marketed towards people on the gaming/performance side. Obviously anyone buying this board in the retail store is buying it with an intent to play games, and almost no one who games in 2015 uses a VGA or DVI ports, it also has PS/2 port.
    I said the same thing in my last review regarding VGA ports. I don't think they're necessary on a Z97 or X99 board specifically meant for power users. Having a DVI, HDMI, or DisplayPort still makes sense because even though you'll likely have a dGPU, at times you'll need to use the integrated video, say for troubleshooting. I've already covered PS/2.

    16355398 said:
    I am paying for these useless features that regular people almost no longer use, let alone gamers or people who are into PC building. You can include a HDMI to VGA or DVI adapter just in case someone out there still needs them.

    I think they need to start removing some of the legacy ports and chips and make boards cleaner, cheaper and more affordable to manufacture and buy."
    Your situation does not apply to everybody, nor even most people. If you think premium mboards are expensive now, imagine how pricey they'd be if they had to make 10 versions of the same board just to cater to all the people who might use it. Desktop mboards have to have a LOT of different features because the same model board will often be used for many different things.
    Reply
  • tpovic
    16359804 said:
    16355398 said:
    Is there really a need for a PS/2 port on a performance motherboard?
    Yes. A lot of gamers still refuse to use anything except a PS/2 keyboard. These are the same type of people who would shell out big money for an extreme gaming rig.

    16355398 said:
    Why not remove all the USB 2.0 ports and maybe add 2 more USB 3.0 ports.
    Because the X99 chipset is limited to six USB3 ports. Often this comes as four ports on the back and one for the front panel header. Adding more USB3 requires an additional USB controller chip and that costs more money. Besides, USB2 handles basic peripherals such as keyboards, mice, printers, scanners, etc more than adequately, so removing them is unnecessary. USB3 is only necessary for external high-speed storage at the moment so there's no reason to think your keyboard and mouse must use USB3.

    16355398 said:
    I recently purchased a MSI motherboards called GAMING 5, it is a gaming motherboard (duhh), marketed towards people on the gaming/performance side. Obviously anyone buying this board in the retail store is buying it with an intent to play games, and almost no one who games in 2015 uses a VGA or DVI ports, it also has PS/2 port.
    I said the same thing in my last review regarding VGA ports. I don't think they're necessary on a Z97 or X99 board specifically meant for power users. Having a DVI, HDMI, or DisplayPort still makes sense because even though you'll likely have a dGPU, at times you'll need to use the integrated video, say for troubleshooting. I've already covered PS/2.

    16355398 said:
    I am paying for these useless features that regular people almost no longer use, let alone gamers or people who are into PC building. You can include a HDMI to VGA or DVI adapter just in case someone out there still needs them.

    I think they need to start removing some of the legacy ports and chips and make boards cleaner, cheaper and more affordable to manufacture and buy."
    Your situation does not apply to everybody, nor even most people. If you think premium mboards are expensive now, imagine how pricey they'd be if they had to make 10 versions of the same board just to cater to all the people who might use it. Desktop mboards have to have a LOT of different features because the same model board will often be used for many different things.

    Reply