Do Two GeForce GTX 680s Beat Three GeForce GTX 660 Tis In SLI?

Results: Aliens Vs. Predator And F1 2012

At its High quality preset, Aliens vs. Predator displays almost-linear performance scaling as we move from two-way to three-way SLI with our GeForce GTX 660 Tis.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti hits its performance ceiling at AvP’s highest-quality settings, roughly matching a pair of GeForce GTX 680s at 5760x1080. Higher resolutions might have shown the GeForce GTX 680s leading. However, we would have needed a trio of 27" screens at 7680x1440 or 30" monitors at 7680x1600.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti’s narrower memory bus appears to be the most likely culprit for the loss of performance leadership at this game's most demanding settings.

Memory capacity, on the other hand, does not appear to be an issue, as the 2 GB stock-clocked GeForce GTX 680 nearly matches its overclocked 4 GB sibling.

SLI appears to hurt performance in F1 2012 at 1920x1080 and High Quality settings. Based on the slight slow-down we see at 5760x1080, in addition to the bottlenecks we identified in Does Memory Performance Bottleneck Your Games?, it's probable that this title is being held back by platform performance.

Only when we increase the graphics demands with Ultra quality settings do we see our different configurations getting hit in different ways.

For example, the GeForce GTX 660 Tis in SLI get hammered pretty hard at 5760x1080. This appears to be due to a combination of its narrower memory bus and lower memory capacity. The 2 GB GeForce GTX 680 also adds perspective, dropping way behind the 4 GB version at 5760x1080, while still beating two GeForce GTX 660 Tis in two-way SLI.

Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • renz496
    off topic:

    when titan's review comes out?

    on topic:

    frankly i'm no multi gpu nor multi monitor user. but for the green camp if you want multi monitor gtx 660 ti 3Gb is a good choice if you want the cheap option. if you want more horse power while still on the cheap side then 7950 is the answer. (the latest game bundle from amd might also lean some people to buy amd cards)


    Reply
  • A sneak peak to the GTX Titain 6GBs. From the website "WCCF Tech"
    http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-pictured-gk110-finally-arrives-consumers-blasting-6-gb-memory/
    Reply
  • rantoc
    From my own experience I would rather go with 2x 680 as dual sli scales very well on about _all_ titles while tri/quad sli can be more of a gambling in performance - For titles where all the cards scale well its sure nice as hell - Where it does not you can even loose performance by adding a third/fourth card (even thoo that scenario gets less and less frequent).
    Reply
  • mcd023
    id like to see some benchies on metro 2033 with physx and DoF just for fun hahaha
    Reply
  • hero1
    Nice review, makes me consider taking 3x7950 instead of 2x7970. Would equal in price due to sales that are going on. But, maybe grab a Titan? I hope to see another review in 8 hrs featuring Nvidia GeForce Titan.
    Reply
  • mayankleoboy1
    Not the point of this article, but i noticed that a single gtx680 is a complete beast at 1080P.
    Also, it would have been interesting to see the CPU usage during the tests.

    Edit : A repeat of this article with the HD7000 cards should be performed, specially after the 13.2 driver are released.
    Reply
  • hero1
    mayankleoboy1Not the point of this article, but i noticed that a single gtx680 is a complete beast at 1080P.Also, it would have been interesting to see the CPU usage during the tests.Edit : A repeat of this article with the HD7000 cards should be performed, specially after the 13.2 driver are released.
    Yes same review for HD 7000 series should be given. Can't wait for that.
    Reply
  • merikafyeah
    I'd still go for a GTX 690 Hydro Copper. Overclock it and pwn while only taking two slots. SLI configs which take up all your slots seem highly inefficient and unappealing.
    Reply
  • esrever
    when are you going to switch to the new 3dmark?
    Reply
  • rmpumper
    Why do you say "higher/lower is better" in some graphs? Which is it - higher or lower?
    Reply