Skip to main content

GeForce GTX 680, Part 2: SLI, 5760x1080, And Overclocking

Multi-Card, Wide-Screen Gaming, And Your Feedback

In the last week, I ate terribly, drank horrible, sugary things, and slept just enough to get myself into the lab to run benchmarks. Yesterday, as I polished off the last bit of text for GeForce GTX 680 2 GB Review: Kepler Sends Tahiti On Vacation, I truly thought I was in for a relaxing early weekend. But then the FedEx guy knocked. Oh, FedEx guy. The rumble of your truck is a bittersweet symphony. 

Hi, delivery man.

Sure enough, I had a second GeForce GTX 680 on my hands. And I had already purchased a pair of Radeon HD 7970s. Really, there would be no excuse for not comparing the four boards.

I wanted to test 5760x1080 performance in my original piece, but simply ran out of time after the first three resolutions. Nvidia posted a new driver immediately after the launch, so I could also take the opportunity to verify that its NVEnc/MPEG-2 bug was fixed (it's not) (Update: Nvidia tells us that NVEnc is working, but that its CUDA cores are yielding better performance, masking the impact of its fixed-function hardware). Many folks asked to see a comparison between overclocked Radeon HD 7970 and GeForce GTX 680 cards, and that’d become possible as well.

And oh, there’s the issue of availability. We’ve been quick to slam AMD in the past for paper-launching its products, sending samples out to press with a note to expect hardware weeks later. Nvidia made it a point that GeForce GTX 680 would be available on launch day, and an early leak from Newegg provided confirmation enough. Unfortunately, the boards disappeared within hours of going on sale, and there are no longer any GeForce GTX 680s to buy. Nvidia says that another wave will hit our shores in early April (Update: Nvidia also claims that a quantity of boards are arriving to AIBs every day, so keep checking online. The "early April" guesstimate referred to what the company calls "going virtual," where its partners will start shipping their own customized designs and volume ramps up substantially. We'll be keeping an eye on the availability story in the meantime; as of 3/25, there are none available). But until then, everyone who didn’t set their alarm for the 6:00 AM embargo is just as stuck as the folks who had to wait weeks for Radeon HD 7970s, and that’s no fun.

Lastly, I made a mistake in yesterday’s story. In calculating the performance per watt index of the GeForce GTX 680, a single cell in Excel was reversed, and the 680’s performance ended up getting divided by the 7970’s power. The result was an overstatement of Kepler’s efficiency compared to Fermi, which has already been fixed in the launch story. GK104’s performance per watt outcome compared to GeForce GTX 580 is still significantly better than Tahiti’s—but not to the degree previously reported.

At any rate, today’s update should give you an even more complete picture of the GeForce GTX 680’s behavior and how it compares against AMD’s fastest single-GPU card. Let’s have a look at the card from EVGA enabling our SLI-based benchmarks, and then get on with the numbers!

  • tacoslave
    amds driver team needs to get off its ass i mean look at those crossfire results thats downright pitiful .
    Reply
  • bystander
    tacoslaveamds driver team needs to get off its ass i mean look at those crossfire results thats downright pitiful .What is wrong with their crossfire performance?

    You do have to look at the high resolution benchmarks to see actual crossfire results, as 1080p benchmarks are being bottlenecked by the CPU.
    Reply
  • I am a PC
    It is quite clear that the Radeons are more powerful but that once again the Nvidia favoring benchmark suite once again favors Nvidia.
    Reply
  • Would like to see CUDA compute instead of openCL stuff. Something like Blender/Cycles benchmark.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    I am a PCIt is quite clear that the Radeons are more powerful but that once again the Nvidia favoring benchmark suite once again favors Nvidia.If you were to hand-pick a suite to favor AMD, what would it include? :) You did notice the Radeons doing really well in Battlefield and Metro, right?
    Reply
  • cangelini
    AgonothetaWould like to see CUDA compute instead of openCL stuff. Something like Blender/Cycles benchmark.Our Blender test is being working on right now--currently we're only utilizing the Tiles/Cycles engines for CPU reviews.
    Reply
  • My MSI 7870 came with Catalyst 12.3, so why use 12.2 if 12.3 is out there?
    Reply
  • weatherdude
    You know, I'm starting to wonder what the Tom's Hardware labs are like. I hope it has something to keep the staff sane as they run tests over and over again.

    Anyways, looks like the competition in the GPU world is going strong right now. To me both the GTX 680 and Radeon 7970 are fine pieces of work. The general compute performance of Tahiti is really really good though so will AMD really reduce the prices significantly below the GTX 680?

    Great review as usual. All your hard work is appreciated.
    Reply
  • cangelini
    sniper13xMy MSI 7870 came with Catalyst 12.3, so why use 12.2 if 12.3 is out there?Because it's not?
    Reply
  • cangelini
    weatherdudeYou know, I'm starting to wonder what the Tom's Hardware labs are like. I hope it has something to keep the staff sane as they run tests over and over again.Anyways, looks like the competition in the GPU world is going strong right now. To me both the GTX 680 and Radeon 7970 are fine pieces of work. The general compute performance of Tahiti is really really good though so will AMD really reduce the prices significantly below the GTX 680?Great review as usual. All your hard work is appreciated.If ever you're in Bakersfield, CA, you're welcome to drop by and check the lab out. It's like a gamer candy store, literally stacked with graphics cards higher than I can reach!
    Reply