Gigabyte Aorus 10000 SSD Review: Bold PCIe 5.0 SSD, If You Can Find It

Gigabyte’s take on the first wave of PCIe 5.0 SSDs

Gigabyte Aorus 10000 SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Comparison Products

The Gigabyte Aorus 10000 competes against two other PCIe 5.0 SSDs, the Phison E26 ES and the Inland TD510. The Crucial T700 is still currently only for preview due to unfinished firmware, but we’ll have a full review soon. We also have several high-end PCIe 4.0 drives for comparison, including the Samsung 990 Pro, the Solidigm P44 Pro, the Adata Legend 960, the Corsair MP600 Pro LPX, the Crucial P5 Plus, the Gigabyte Aorus 7000s, and the Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus-G.

Shane Downing
Freelance Reviewer

Shane Downing is a Freelance Reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering consumer storage hardware.

  • kjfatl
    Where is the heat coming from? For example, is it 90% from the controller chip and 10% from the memory array? Is there a path for lower power PCIE5?
    Reply
  • UWguy
    I really wish you’d start measuring the amount of heat coming from these drives. The heat sinks are downright scary.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    UWguy said:
    I really wish you’d start measuring the amount of heat coming from these drives. The heat sinks are downright scary.
    We'll look into it, but you can tell by the power figures that this size of heatsink is overkill. We're talking peak power of <12W, and that's nowhere near the average power under load of 6.7W. It's not that hard to deal with 10W of power use. The Crucial T700 had a significantly smaller heatsink and was actually faster (thanks to faster NAND).
    Reply
  • kjfatl
    Measuring the DC power in is probably sufficient unless the PCIE termination is super-power hungry.
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    I wouldn't even consider a M.2 that needs a heat sink that size.
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    That heat sink is completely ridiculous. How is that going to fit on any motherboard that has heat shields on it?
    Reply
  • gg83
    That slogan "team up fight on". Lmfao! Excellent gamer speak.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    Have to agree with most others. These drives are hot. They seem to run very high temps over PCIe 4.

    I think the heatsink is gaudy, too big of a footprint.
    Reply
  • waltc3
    What motherboard was it tested in? Nothing with a heatsink would work in my PCie4 Aorus Master--not enough clearance under my video card. Yes, those heatsinks are non-starters--too much heat, by far. My 980 Pro PCIe4 500GB NVMe SSD runs fine and cool enough at top, sustained PCIe4 speeds without a heatsink--whereas my PCIe3.0 960 EVO 250GB NVMe will not run sustained at PCIe3.0 speeds without throttling. (When the 960 EVO was my primary NVMe drive in the 0 position, I could not do an AV scan of C:\ without the drive failing to complete the scan. No problem with the 980 Pro in the 0 slot position, with the 960 moved down to the next NVMe slot. The 960 is fine for anything that isn't sustained operation.)
    Reply
  • SyCoREAPER
    I love the bend/warping the drive has.

    Makes me curious if there is thermal expansion and contraction at play which will affect the reliability.
    Reply