Results: DTP And Multimedia
We're often asked which CPU or graphics card is best for intensive Adobe CC workloads, and we're ready to answer the question as far as CPUs are concerned.
Once again, we leave the provisioning and automation of the benchmarks, as well as the computation of the geometrical mean (GEOMEAN), to PCMark 8 Professional.
Adobe Photoshop CC (64 Bit)
We have two different Adobe Photoshop benchmarks to run. The top of the chart stays the same, but the lower rungs change places depending on the workload. We start with the light version.
| Pictures | File Size | Picture Size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source | 14 | 3.9 - 17.6MB | 2500 x 16776048 x 4032 |
| Target | 14 | 388 - 778KB | 1200 x 800 |
| Actions | - Start Application and Load Data File - Change Color Balance - Add Auto Level - Adjust Shadows and Glare - Downscale with Bicubic Interpolation - Compute and Add Unsharp Mask - Save Results in Files and Close Application | ||
Using additional functions, which includes output in different compressed file formats, puts even more strain on the hardware. Taken together, the two tests provide a fairly complete picture of any bottlenecks that would be encountered in daily usage. The filters used here don’t include GPU acceleration, which means that we're measuring CPU and platform performance.
| File Size | Picture Size | Resolution | Layer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source PSD | 113MB | 5184x7744 | 300 DPI | 1 |
| PSD Export | 1320MB | 7000x10457 | 300 DPI | 4 |
| TIFF Export | 476MB | 7000x10457 | 300 DPI | None |
| JPEG Export | 177KB | 1000x1494 | 300 DPI | None |
| Actions | - Start Application and Load PSD File - Upscale with Bicubic Interpolation - Change Color Depth to 16-bit per Channel - Create Color Range and Copy to New Layer - Merge Two Picture Layers and Insert as New Layer in Front - Compute and Add Unsharp Mask to this Foreground Layer - Create and Delete Elliptical Selection in this Layer - Merge All Layers into One Layer - Add Gaussian Blur - Add and Delete Gradient Mask - Decrease Layer's Opacity - Export File to PSD, TIFF and JPEG - Flatten Picture and Downscale with Bicubic Interpolation - Compute and Add Unsharp Mask - Export as JPEG and Close Application | |||
We don't see the usual order due to the Core i7-7700’s surprisingly bad performance. We repeated the benchmark run several times, but, for whatever reason, the result stayed the same. Still, the differences are tiny. None of the CPUs, not even AMD’s FX-9590, are actually slow.
Adobe InDesign CC (64 Bit)
Adobe InDesign emphasizes IPC throughput, as evidenced by its sensitivity to clock rate. It’s interesting that the Kaby Lake CPUs end up being slower than the corresponding Skylake models at the same frequencies.
| File Size | Pages | Pictures | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source File | 385MB | 40 | 42 |
| Target File | 378MB | 40 | 40 |
| PDF Export | 64.7MB | 40 | 40 |
| Actions | - Start Application and Load Data File - Change Picture Size and Reposition Pictures - Add Colored Rectangle as Decorative Element - Change Border Settings - Insert Text - Save Document as New File - Export as PDF File and Close Application | ||
Adobe Illustrator CC (64 Bit)
For Adobe Illustrator, CPU and storage performance are the deciding factors. The hardware’s particularly important when it comes to writing operations.
| Original File | Saved File | Exported PDF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| File | 733KB | 6.2MB | 5.6MB |
| Actions | - Start Application and Load Data File - Change Picture Sizes and Reposition Pictures - Add Translucent Filled Rectangle for Color Effect - Vectorize Pictures in Document - Add Text Fields, Lines, Rectangles, Ellipses, Stars and Spines - Save the Documents in a New File - Export as PDF - Close Document and Application | ||
Adobe After Effects CC
Adobe After Effects is able to schedule tasks like vector conversion in parallel. This is reflected in the results from CPUs with SMT that achieve better multi-threading performance, placing them above their competition. Uncompressed AVIs drive home the point that a higher clock rate can compensate for the lack of SMT.
| File Size | Resolution | Data Rate | Audio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File 1 | 890MB | 1080p, 30 FPS | 1458 Mb/s | 1536 Kb/s 48 KHzStereo |
| Output | AERender (Uncompressed AVI) | |||
| File 2 | 5.64MB | 1080p, 30 FPS | 0.9 Mb/s | 256 Kb/s44 KHzStereo |
| Output Settings | Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile- Constant Bitrate: 0.9 Mb/s- Image Quality: 98- Keyframe Interval: 1 Second- Buffer Size: 1 SecondsWindows Media Audio 9.2- Constant Audio Bitrate: 256 Kb/s, 44 KHz, Stereo (A/V) CBR | |||
Bottom Line
Adobe CC doesn’t demand a CPU with SMT at this point. In the end, any good quad-core processor will do, with the largest gains observable from high IPC throughput and clock rates. Processors that can hit even higher clock rates via Turbo Boost/Core across four cores have an advantage.
A direct comparison shows that Kaby Lake CPUs aren’t any faster than Skylake CPUs at the same clock rate. It’s actually the opposite in some situations, with the Skylake CPUs edging out Intel’s new processors. In order to achieve this, the older CPUs first need to be manually overclocked, though.