Plextor M5 Pro 256 GB Review: 19 nm NAND And Marvell's Latest
Features
By Richard Hart
published Hot on the heels of its M5S, Plextor sent us the M5 Pro. Loaded with hot new technologies like 19 nm NAND and the latest Marvell controller, the company's flagship was certainly worth waiting for. How does it do against the established incumbents, though?
Test Setup And Drive Comparison
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 | Samsung 830 256 GB (MZ-7PC256N) | Crucial M4 256 GB (CT256M4SSD2) | Vertex 4256 GB | Plextor M5S 256 GB(PX-256M5S) | Plextor M5P 256 GB (PX-256M5P) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Price | $248 | $210 | $210 | $230 | Awaiting MSRP |
Processor | Samsung S4LJ204X01-Y040 | Marvell 88SS9174-BLD2 | Marvell 88SS9187-BLD2 | Marvell 88SS9174-BLD2 | Marvell 88SS9187-BLD2 |
DDR RAM Buffer Size (MB) | 256 (128 x 2) | 128 (128 x 1) | 1,024 (2 x 512) | 512 (2 x 256) | 512 (2 x 256) |
NAND | 2x-nm MLC Toggle-mode DDR | Micron 25 nm Synchronous MLC | Intel 25 nm Synchronous MLC | Micron 25 nm Synchronous MLC | Toshiba 19 nm MLC Toggle-mode DDR |
Firmware | CXM03B1Q | 000F | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Formatted Capacity | 238 GiB | 238 GiB | 238 GiB | 238 GiB | 238 GiB |
Interface | SATA 6Gb/s | SATA 6Gb/s | SATA 6Gb/s | SATA 6Gb/s | SATA 6Gb/s |
Form Factor | 2.5" 7 mm | 2.5" 9.5 mm | 2.5" 9.3 mm | 2.5" 9 mm | 2.5" 7 mm |
Warranty | Three Years | Three Years | Five Years | Three Years | Five Years |
Sequential Read (MB/s) | 520 | 500 | 560 | 520 | 540 |
Sequential Write (MB/s) | 400 | 260 | 510 | 390 | 450 |
4 KB Random Read (IOPS) | 80 000 | 45 000 | 90 000 | 73 000 | 94 000 |
4 KB Random Write (IOPS) | 30 000 | 50 000 | 85 000 | 70 000 | 86 000 |
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 | Test System and Software Setup |
---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i7-2700 (Sandy Bridge), 3.5 GHz, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache, Hyper-Threading enabled, Power-saving features disabled |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V, Z68 Chipset, LGA 1155, BIOS 3402 |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance 4 x 4 GB DDR3-1600 |
Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6970 2 GB |
Storage | Plextor PX-256M5P, SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware 1.0 |
Operating System | Windows 7 (64 Bit) SP1 |
Intel Chipset Drivers | 10.8.0.1003 |
AMD Graphics Driver | Catalyst 12.6 |
Benchmarks | |
Anvil's Storage Utility | RC3 |
hIOmon | Client Version 7.0.229.0 |
HD Tune Pro | 5 |
Iometer | 2006.07.27 |
Current page: Test Setup And Drive Comparison
Prev Page Inside Plextor's 256 GB M5 Pro Next Page Benchmark Results: Anvil's Storage UtilityStay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
More about ssds
23 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
You have the wrong Marvell controller listed for the crucial M4 and the Plextor M5S. This controller is new.Reply
The old one was the 88SS9174-BKK2.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/plextor-m3-crucial-m4-octane-performance-pro,3178.html -
mayankleoboy1 can we have a benchmark of the time it takes to install a fresh copy of Win7+SP1 on a SSD ? Because thats the first thing a user will do after buying a new drive.Reply -
echondo mayankleoboy1can we have a benchmark of the time it takes to install a fresh copy of Win7+SP1 on a SSD ? Because thats the first thing a user will do after buying a new drive.Reply
I believe we can all assume it will take around 10-15 minutes. My old SATA2 Vertex drive can have Windows installed with all the Windows updates I want in around 20 minutes, it would be less time but I have to install all my drivers first for my motherboard :p -
SpadeM grantwarI'd love to see how this drive fares against the samsung 840 Pro.Reply
Here you go:
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/665?vs=646 -
JeanLuc I was on Youtube the other day on the Corsair channel and they were showing the advantages of 'Ram cache' which was lights years faster then SSD's in therms of throughput. Could Toms consider doing an article into Ram cache as I think it would be of interest to people who have 16-32Gb systems (since DDR3 is cheap at the moment) can spare the extra system ram to cache files and software.Reply -
merikafyeah SpadeMHere you go: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/665?vs=646Wow. The 840 Pro beat the M5 Pro in virtually everything according to that data. The 840 Pro does cost significantly more though.Reply -
merikafyeah JeanLucI was on Youtube the other day on the Corsair channel and they were showing the advantages of 'Ram cache' which was lights years faster then SSD's in therms of throughput. Could Toms consider doing an article into Ram cache as I think it would be of interest to people who have 16-32Gb systems (since DDR3 is cheap at the moment) can spare the extra system ram to cache files and software.TheSSDReview did something similar:Reply
http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/romex-fancycache-review-ssd-performance-at-13gbs-and-765000-iops-in-60-seconds-flat/
No point in even comparing RAM to SSDs, as even "slow" RAM is faster than even the best SSDs by about the same amount as the best SSDs are faster than floppy disks. -
aicom This review would have been impressive if it was published 2 weeks ago. With the 840 Pro out, it simply blows the M5P out of the water. Too bad it wasn't included in the benchmark charts here.Reply