ADVERTORIAL Microsoft's BPOS: Q&A for Skeptics

5

The Software Platform

Microsoft Online Services are built on a Windows Server 2003 foundation. An SPS infrastructure doesn’t need the latest bells and whistles. It really needs time-hardened management and centralized security features. Not much has changed in the way of securing the connection from clients to back-end servers. What was bulletproof five years ago remains so today. Similarly, there’s no need to reinvent the wheel and use Microsoft Online Services to test run new platforms. The Microsoft Solution for Hosted Messaging and Collaboration that powers part of BPOS was already in its 3.0 revision way back in January 2005. Years ago, people used to joke that it took Microsoft three tries to get something right. Even if true, the server platforms underneath BPOS are well beyond that point.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • tijmen007
    First... Rawr xD
    Reply
  • tijmen007
    FIRST! Rawr xd
    Reply
  • Shnur
    So basically it's good for the mid-size/emerging businesses? I think it's a move in the right direction, although in the current times I would like to see Microsoft focus a bit more on Small Business Solutions rather than for bigger companies, only because for the Small Businesses it's a lot harder to spend even 1000$ on something.
    Reply
  • colemars
    William said: For example, in Exchange Online, there’s no more PowerShell, scripting, or similar nuances for tweaking.
    I understand the article is almost 2 years old, but that is a plain wrong statement. You can ceratinly use PowerShell or Migration Tool Command Shell with Exchange Online. You should update the article sir.
    Reply
  • colemars
    William said: For example, in Exchange Online, there’s no more PowerShell, scripting, or similar nuances for tweaking.
    I understand the article is almost 2 years old, but that is a plain wrong statement. You can ceratinly use PowerShell or Migration Tool Command Shell with Exchange Online. You should update the article sir.
    Reply