MSI 990FXA Gaming Versus ASRock 990FX Killer

Early Verdict

Solid performer and a decent overclocker. All-around good pick with room to grow.

Pros

  • +

    Good overclocking options and BIOS options • Features geared toward the true gamer

Cons

  • -

    Only two PWM fans • Ineffective regulator heat sinks

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Revisiting The 990FX With A Twist

After reviewing several smaller HTPC-oriented AMD boards, I was happy to get my next assignment. Though the previous boards were efficient, compact, and made my inner home-theater nerd delighted, I really wanted to flex my muscles and stress my test bench. The Tom's Hardware motherboard crew has the Intel roadmap pretty well covered, so it is with pleasure that I revisit the land of Advanced Micro Devices.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • FreedomsFlame
    An important distinction between the boards (one that I found out myself when building a rig recently) is that the 990FXA supports 220W processors (in my case, the FX9590) while the ASRock board only supports processors up to 180W.
    Reply
  • Nuckles_56
    The CPU listed for the overclocking graph is wrong, you say it is an a10 7850k instead
    Reply
  • Cryio
    I don't get it. Why are there APU benchmarks and name checks in this review? These are AM3+ boards.
    Reply
  • rolli59
    This is obvious error "Today, I will be reviewing the 990FX chipset but, more importantly, ASRock and Gigabyte's offerings to the gaming community" Since we are dealing with Asrock and MSI!
    Reply
  • Onus
    One of the more useful data points here is that a 500W PSU shut down when its input exceeded 500W; that means it isn't good for its label, as it should be able to provide 500W of output, which in an 80+ gold PSU would be something like 562W on the input.
    Reply
  • nayrnayr1
    When you get an AMD Zen in there, review it, immediately.
    Reply
  • whiteodian
    Are there any enthusiast mATX boards based on this chipset? A couple of years ago, I was looking and the pickings were slim. I'd like to see some considerations for smaller builds.
    Reply
  • utroz
    PROOF READ.. The overclocking results are obviously not right because they are way too low and labeled as A10-7850K results.. Please fix ASAP..
    Reply
  • TheTerk
    PROOF READ.. The overclocking results are obviously not right because they are way too low and labeled as A10-7850K results.. Please fix ASAP..
    Fixes are submitted. I was writing this review and the ASRock Mini ITX review at the same time, so sorry for the mix up. The overclocking data is still valid, and the method for overclocking was correctly described. This processor could probably have reached Thomas' previous results if I omitted Prime95 errors.
    Reply
  • MarcosDuran
    For anyone considering this board, do not expect to be able to set up drives in RAID 0 with any of the newer SSDs. I have a 990FX board and have gone through two exchanges and have determined with AMD that the board does not support my 850 EVOs.
    Reply