Seagate FireCuda 510 M.2 NVMe SSD Review: One Expensive Fish

Seagate’s FireCuda 510 swims into the lab

Seagate FireCuda 510 M.2 NVMe
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

While Seagate’s FireCuda 510 is fast, durable, and can handle most workloads you throw at it, the SSD is too expensive considering its older hardware.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Solid overall performance

  • +

    Available in capacities up to 2TB

  • +

    5-year warranty

  • +

    Higher-than-average endurance ratings

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Small SLC write cache

  • -

    Blue PCB

  • -

    Costly

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

On the hunt for something a bit faster to power your new gaming system, or are you just looking to upgrade your workstation with a reliable SSD? Either way, Seagate’s FireCuda 510 is a top candidate for nearly any task. The FireCuda 510 is a responsive M.2 NVMe SSD that can deliver your data at speeds of up to 3.45 GBps, is available in capacities of up to 2TB, and features incredible endurance figures. But, with a very high price per GB for what is rather common hardware, it’s hard to recommend over most of the Best SSDs on the market.   

Seagate says it designed the FireCuda 510 specifically for professional gamers, but it isn't as purpose-built as the company would like you to think. Seagate bases most, if not all, of its consumer SSDs on Phison controllers. The FireCuda 510 is simply a Phison PS5012-E12 SSD with BiCS3 64-Layer TLC NAND flash. In reality Seagate simply put a little twist on Phison's firmware and stamped its logo onto the controller package. Now, there's nothing wrong with that. In fact, we see it as beneficial to the reliability of the SSDs that a world-leading SSD controller manufacturer is handling most of the work. So, not only will gamers reap the benefit of Seagate's FireCuda 510, but working professionals, too.

Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • CatalyticDragon
    The color of the PCB counts against it but the fact that it's only PCIe3 doesn't? Weird.
    Reply
  • seanwebster
    CatalyticDragon said:
    The color of the PCB counts against it but the fact that it's only PCIe3 doesn't? Weird.
    I don't see how that would count against it. Next-gen controllers haven't dropped yet. Most of the market is Gen3 based. Intel doesn't even support the Gen4 interface yet, either.
    Reply
  • evil_72
    seanwebster said:
    I don't see how that would count against it. Next-gen controllers haven't dropped yet. Most of the market is Gen3 based. Intel doesn't even support the Gen4 interface yet, either.
    The lowliest of current generation of Ryzen 3k chips do though, such as the Ryzen 3300X @ $120.00 USD, which supports Gen 4 on the B550 motherboards, starting @ $89.00.
    Reply
  • seanwebster
    evil_72 said:
    The lowliest of current generation of Ryzen 3k chips do though, such as the Ryzen 3300X @ $120.00 USD, which supports Gen 4 on the B550 motherboards, starting @ $89.00.
    Yep, but if someone is buying low-end hardware, to begin with, they aren't going to splurge for Gen4 SSDs that cost a premium for very little advantage.
    Reply