PCI-SIG announces PCIe 8.0 spec with twice the bandwidth — 1TB/s of peak bandwidth, 256 GT/s per lane, and a possible new connector

PCI-SIG
(Image credit: PCI-SIG)

The PCI-SIG consortium has officially announced the development of the PCI Express 8.0 specification. This new version is set to double data transfer rate to 256 GT/s per lane. In addition to the extra bandwidth, PCIe Gen8 is said to feature protocol enhancements to increase real-world bandwidth and reduce power consumption.

The upcoming PCIe 8.0 specification will double the raw bit rate of PCIe 7.0 to 256.0 GT/s, enabling up to 1 TB/s of bi-directional bandwidth across a x16 configuration. The spec will continue to rely on PAM4 signaling with forward error correction (FEC) and Flit Mode encoding, which have been used with PCIe 6.0 and PCIe 7.0. However, hitting 256 GT/s per lane will likely be an incredibly difficult task. Engineers will enter uncharted territory, as no current copper interconnect standard can boast such a data transfer rate, especially over distances of tens of centimeters.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Jame5
    I know it's an extra cost, but what about optical between the controller and the slot? It's only a few inches replaced, but it would help.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Not sure we should trust them with a new connector
    Reply
  • chaz_music
    Even with PAM4, this is solidly in high frequency RF signaling. This might be the end of backwards compatible PCIe slots. I could see a connector scheme with shielded coaxial interconnects, or as others said using optical instead of RF over copper.
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    Gigabyte: best we can do is pcie4...
    Reply
  • jp7189
    Im pretty sure the use of pam4 rules out optical and strongly indicates copper.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The article said:
    The upcoming PCIe 8.0 specification will double the raw bit rate of PCIe 7.0 to 256.0 GT/s, enabling up to 1 TB/s of bi-directional bandwidth across a x16 configuration.
    For the love of... !

    Please stop parroting this BS marketing number. The far more useful number is 512 GB/s. If someone has a PCIe 8.0 SSD on a x4 link, the bandwidth of the other direction will not help increase their read or write speeds! Okay, sure there are mixed workloads, but most are either predominantly reading or writing, and the numbers drive makers tout are certainly uni-directional numbers.

    Most of the time, you're bottlenecked on one direction or the other. This is why the bandwidth usually quoted is the uni-directional speed, even in a full-duplex link. In gaming, nearly all the data transfer volume is from host -> GPU. The fact that the link is bidir and symmetrical is almost inconsequential.

    For example, we say that Ethernet is 1 Gigabit or 10 Gigabit. Just because it happens to (normally) be full-duplex, we don't then say it's 2 Gigabit or 20 Gigabit!

    @Paul Alcorn Can the new Toms Hardware please add this to your style guide?
    : )
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Jame5 said:
    I know it's an extra cost, but what about optical between the controller and the slot? It's only a few inches replaced, but it would help.
    I can't find the articles, but IIRC there's both a working group for routing existing PCIe signals over optical links and another working group exploring post-PCIe optical interconnects.

    Here's a proprietary effort at routing standard PCIe 7.0 over optical:
    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/optical-pcie-70-connection-hits-a-blazing-128-gts
    Reply
  • bit_user
    logainofhades said:
    Not sure we should trust them with a new connector
    Even if it's the only option? There might be no way to meet the electrical requirements of PCIe 8.0 with the existing connector.

    Just because it's PCIe doesn't mean we need to have the same edge connector we know and love(?). M.2 and U.2 are two examples of PCIe signals using different connectors. The fact that the signal is exactly the same means you can do weird hacks, like mounting M.2 SSDs on a cheap PCIe add-in card or even having a M.2 board that can host a PCIe add-in card.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    S58_is_the_goat said:
    Gigabyte: best we can do is pcie4...
    To be fair, that was only on B650 boards. Many other B650 boards never even gave you the option to enable PCIe 5.0, such as an ASUS board I have.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    S58_is_the_goat said:
    Gigabyte: best we can do is pcie4...

    99% of all PC users don't need more than that, and many of those don't even need Gen 4.

    Even a SATA ssd is fast enough for general PC usage.
    Reply