People don't buy AI PCs because of AI — report shows the need for upgrades drives AI PC adoption

Microsoft branding for Copilot+ PC
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Processors with AI capabilities have recently become popular, especially with the launch of the Qualcomm Snapdragon X, AMD Ryzen AI 300, and the Intel Core Ultra 200V processors, which feature NPUs that deliver 40 TOPS and up. However, IDC Research says that the adoption of these AI PCs, especially the Windows Copilot+ PCs, is largely driven by the need to purchase new computers or upgrade existing laptops—not because of their AI capabilities.

“While AI has been a buzzword of late, it has yet to be a purchase driver among PC buyers,” says Worldwide Mobile Device Trackers research manager Jitesh Ubrani. “Businesses certainly recognize the importance of AI though many struggle to see the immediate use case and instead are opting for AI PCs as a means to futureproofing.” He also said that most retail customers do not appreciate the advantages that the on-chip Neural Processing Unit (NPU) brings.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • hotaru251
    i mean...duh?

    "ai" (as in llm) was never wanted by majority % of ppl.

    Its a very niche group that actually cares...and unlike crypto fad it lacks the profit.
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    LLMs are extremely useless, especially since they require massive amounts of data versus other types of machine learning.

    Maybe they should drop it? My autocorrect was much better before LLMs for example.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Funny as I'm thinking more about how the article transitioned to being about tablets vs. PC's. The latter continues to grow, adapt, and evolve to remain extremely relevant all these decades later. Their general / all-purpose nature makes them indispensable; yes, some have replaced them with phones and tablets and more will yet, but I don't see that happening in droves.

    It continues to be annoying on how surprisingly naive that Microsoft and some hardware manufacturers thought that slapping "AI" in the name would significantly ramp up purchasing rates. At best, they can charge a little more (and they are). MS wasn't going to let Apple get the jump on them this time, and I guess they succeeded.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    There's no common use case or app that utilizes the NPU so of course not.
    However, just the hype may help motivate a few more upgrades, like me, and already under pressure, such as it is, from Windows 11 that won't run on my antique.
    I might like to play with the NPU myself, maybe, but that's not a common thing that will sell a lot of chips.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    I said as much in a different thread. The NPU doesn't matter at all. If it comes with the latest and greatest CPU, that is what I would look at purchasing.

    I've been sitting on a 4th gen laptop for a while now. Really needs to be replaced at some point. I don't use my laptop often, and I would probably put Linux on there anyway at this point.
    Reply
  • tom111111
    Wow, what stupid comments.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    tom111111 said:
    Wow, what stupid comments.
    Refute the comments, don't just call them stupid.
    Reply
  • ThomasKinsley
    Co-Pilot Plus branding is giving AI a bad name. I'm having a blast with my offline LLM. It takes up 8.6GB of RAM and more often than not gives very good answers back. The only drawback I've found is due to my aging GPU, which means I need to wait before I get any responses back. But in today's world these are not extravagant specs anymore. If manufacturers wanted to get people excited for an AI future, then they should be making customizable, trainable, personal, offline AI models because not everyone needs or wants the same AI model. A med student will want a different model compared to a professor, a pilot, or a reporter. Imagine a world where your voice/chat assistant was not as dumb as a box of rocks nor was it a soulless corporate-approved entity. That's what I want, and I suspect most of the consumer base is the same. AI should reflect our interests, not Microsoft's.
    Reply
  • yoji
    Seems like most posting here are aligned with me.. as a "normal" user I am completely unimpressed with AI at the moment.. to be fair I have only tried it to help with PC technical questions and it has been totally USELESS (i.e. a normal google search is better)
    my Brother in law likes it in his work (he marketing) as he says its great at producing marketing proofs in the style and context of his employer.. but for me (no real interest in AI enhanced photos of celebs... or art in general) its completely underwhelming right now (but I am trying to keep an open mind).
    SO is it "bubble", like 3D films/TV? or will it become a real "must have"?
    and will I be able to get a PCI card to introduce a NPU? or that WAY to slow.. and will it only be viable by a complete CPU/chip change?
    Reply
  • Mama Changa
    No people buy an AI PC because they need a PC not AI, but they have to buy something with a BS sticker on it.
    Reply