People don't buy AI PCs because of AI — report shows the need for upgrades drives AI PC adoption
New PCs and laptops come with CPUs with AI capabilities.
Processors with AI capabilities have recently become popular, especially with the launch of the Qualcomm Snapdragon X, AMD Ryzen AI 300, and the Intel Core Ultra 200V processors, which feature NPUs that deliver 40 TOPS and up. However, IDC Research says that the adoption of these AI PCs, especially the Windows Copilot+ PCs, is largely driven by the need to purchase new computers or upgrade existing laptops—not because of their AI capabilities.
“While AI has been a buzzword of late, it has yet to be a purchase driver among PC buyers,” says Worldwide Mobile Device Trackers research manager Jitesh Ubrani. “Businesses certainly recognize the importance of AI though many struggle to see the immediate use case and instead are opting for AI PCs as a means to futureproofing.” He also said that most retail customers do not appreciate the advantages that the on-chip Neural Processing Unit (NPU) brings.
Laptop manufacturers still need to spell out the advantages of an NPU so that buyers can appreciate the capabilities of an AI PC for day-to-day use. Despite Microsoft’s aggressive marketing of its Copilot+ PCs, short-term adoption remains somewhat modest. That said, since all new AMD, Intel, and Qualcomm processors have built-in NPUs, we expect AI PC sales to grow exponentially in the coming years.
Tablet sales growth outpacing traditional computers
Although the sales of AI PC are expected to grow slowly but surely, computers in general are expected to remain flat in 2024, with growth slowing down to just 0.3%. This number is pulled down by the economic challenges experienced by China, as the global market, excluding the East Asian power, is expected to grow by 2.8%.
However, this slowdown in PC sales is offset by the growth of tablet sales. The latter is expected to hit a 7.2% increase this year, largely driven by the refresh cycle as companies release new models with better performance numbers and larger screens. What’s interesting is that this growth isn’t driven by the traditional tablet powerhouse, the iPad, but by the aggressive moves of Android tablet makers.
“The first half of 2024 showed how aggressive some of the Android vendors have been in competing in the tablet market, maximizing on the opportunities for sustainable demand for tablet devices in emerging regions such as Asia/Pacific (excluding Japan), the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and Central and Eastern Europe,” said IDC Mobility and Consumer Device Tracker senior research analyst Anuroopa Nataraj. “Adoption rates are expected to climb in the short term as the market continues to evolve with newer tablet models with upgraded chips, larger screens, and connectivity. And the device replacement cycle is only going to push the growth further.”
Nevertheless, the long-term growth of tablets is expected to slow to near 0% by 2028, especially as these devices still do not offer the whole performance that most users expect from laptops. Furthermore, the increasing efficiency leading to extended battery life and thinner form factors delivered by the latest generation of x86 and Arm processors, as well as the inclusion of touchscreen interfaces on many new PC models, might make purchasing a tablet a moot point for many buyers in the future.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
hotaru251 i mean...duh?Reply
"ai" (as in llm) was never wanted by majority % of ppl.
Its a very niche group that actually cares...and unlike crypto fad it lacks the profit. -
Sleepy_Hollowed LLMs are extremely useless, especially since they require massive amounts of data versus other types of machine learning.Reply
Maybe they should drop it? My autocorrect was much better before LLMs for example. -
DS426 Funny as I'm thinking more about how the article transitioned to being about tablets vs. PC's. The latter continues to grow, adapt, and evolve to remain extremely relevant all these decades later. Their general / all-purpose nature makes them indispensable; yes, some have replaced them with phones and tablets and more will yet, but I don't see that happening in droves.Reply
It continues to be annoying on how surprisingly naive that Microsoft and some hardware manufacturers thought that slapping "AI" in the name would significantly ramp up purchasing rates. At best, they can charge a little more (and they are). MS wasn't going to let Apple get the jump on them this time, and I guess they succeeded. -
JRStern There's no common use case or app that utilizes the NPU so of course not.Reply
However, just the hype may help motivate a few more upgrades, like me, and already under pressure, such as it is, from Windows 11 that won't run on my antique.
I might like to play with the NPU myself, maybe, but that's not a common thing that will sell a lot of chips. -
Eximo I said as much in a different thread. The NPU doesn't matter at all. If it comes with the latest and greatest CPU, that is what I would look at purchasing.Reply
I've been sitting on a 4th gen laptop for a while now. Really needs to be replaced at some point. I don't use my laptop often, and I would probably put Linux on there anyway at this point. -
USAFRet
Refute the comments, don't just call them stupid.tom111111 said:Wow, what stupid comments. -
ThomasKinsley Co-Pilot Plus branding is giving AI a bad name. I'm having a blast with my offline LLM. It takes up 8.6GB of RAM and more often than not gives very good answers back. The only drawback I've found is due to my aging GPU, which means I need to wait before I get any responses back. But in today's world these are not extravagant specs anymore. If manufacturers wanted to get people excited for an AI future, then they should be making customizable, trainable, personal, offline AI models because not everyone needs or wants the same AI model. A med student will want a different model compared to a professor, a pilot, or a reporter. Imagine a world where your voice/chat assistant was not as dumb as a box of rocks nor was it a soulless corporate-approved entity. That's what I want, and I suspect most of the consumer base is the same. AI should reflect our interests, not Microsoft's.Reply -
yoji Seems like most posting here are aligned with me.. as a "normal" user I am completely unimpressed with AI at the moment.. to be fair I have only tried it to help with PC technical questions and it has been totally USELESS (i.e. a normal google search is better)Reply
my Brother in law likes it in his work (he marketing) as he says its great at producing marketing proofs in the style and context of his employer.. but for me (no real interest in AI enhanced photos of celebs... or art in general) its completely underwhelming right now (but I am trying to keep an open mind).
SO is it "bubble", like 3D films/TV? or will it become a real "must have"?
and will I be able to get a PCI card to introduce a NPU? or that WAY to slow.. and will it only be viable by a complete CPU/chip change? -
Mama Changa No people buy an AI PC because they need a PC not AI, but they have to buy something with a BS sticker on it.Reply