AMD sets new supercomputer record, runs CFD simulation over 25x faster on Instinct MI250X GPUs

AMD MI200 supercomputer node rendering
(Image credit: AMD)

AMD processors were instrumental in achieving a new world record during a recent Ansys Fluent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation run on the Frontier supercomputer at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). According to a press release by Ansys, it ran a 2.2-billion-cell axial turbine simulation for Baker Hughes, an energy technology company, testing its next-generation gas turbines aimed at increasing efficiency. The simulation previously took 38.5 hours to complete on 3,700 CPU cores. By using 1,024 AMD Instinct MI250X accelerators paired with AMD EPYC CPUs in Frontier, the simulation time was slashed to 1.5 hours. This is more than 25 times faster, allowing the company to see the impact of the changes it makes on designs much more quickly.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • usertests
    I guess the story here is "software that used to run on CPUs ported to GPUs".
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    usertests said:
    I guess the story here is "software that used to run on CPUs ported to GPUs".
    CFD has been on GPU for years now.
    Reply
  • Samlebon2306
    The article jumps from supercomputers to gaming GPUs. All this to tell us that AMD's drivers are SOOOOO BAAAAAD.

    I am struggling to make a whole with the two disparate stories.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Samlebon2306 said:
    The article jumps from supercomputers to gaming GPUs. All this to tell us that AMD's drivers are SOOOOO BAAAAAD.

    I am struggling to make a whole with the two disparate stories.
    And using an edge case as an example as 1) Tiny's CEO is rather eccentric and loud as amplified by the tech media and 2) AI workloads on AMD non-pro GPUs almost surely meant some software assurances would be sacrificed in favor of the lower GPU costs; the drivers are different. That's why AMD didn't originally officially support that scenario, but Dr. Su later came around to working with Tiny on the driver issues.

    People tend to repeat what they heard, so an issue once can become an issue for a long time -- even after it's not actually an issue anymore.
    Reply