Three Sub-$100 LGA1150 Mini-ITX Motherboards

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

How We Tested

I assembled all three builds in an open case. All of the components except the motherboards were the same. Windows, its drivers and the benchmarks were reloaded for each board.

Test System Components

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPUIntel Pentium G3258
CPU CoolerBoxed Cooler
RAMMushkin Enhanced Stealth 996995S 8GB DDR3-1600 Dual-Channel Kit
GraphicsGigabyte GV-N730D5-2GI GT 730 902MHz Core 5000 MT/s 2GB GDDR5
Hard DriveMushkin Enhanced Chronos G2 MKNSSDCR120GB-G2, 120GB SSD
SoundIntegrated HD Audio
NetworkIntegrated Gigabit Networking
Powerbe quiet! Straight Power 10 500W CM

Software

Swipe to scroll horizontally
OSMicrosoft Windows 8.1 with Update x64
GraphicsNvidia 347.25

Settings

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 ASRock H81M-ITXASRock H97M-ITX/acGigabyte B85N Phoenix WiFi
PCB RevisionNot visible1.022.0
100.0 MHz BCLK99.94 (-0.06%)99.94 (-0.06%)99.76 (-0.24%)

A colleague, also testing motherboards, provided some of his results. They obviously took a lot of time and effort to generate. But looking at them did not discourage me from skipping benchmark sections in future motherboard articles. They were too similar to base a buying decision on, and that's what I hope to do here. Still, some basic benchmarking is required to check for anomalies.

Benchmark Suite

Swipe to scroll horizontally
PCMark 8Version: 2.3.293 Work, Home, and Creative Benchmarks
SiSoftware SandraVersion: 2015.01.21.15 Memory Bandwidth
Crystal DiskMark 3.03Sequential Read
Unigine Heaven 4.0Version 4.0, Built-in Benchmark Basic: DirectX 9, Low Detail, 1280x720, 2xAA, No Tessellation Custom: DirectX11, High Detail, 1280x720, 0xAA, No Tessellation

All tests were run with the CPU at stock settings. However, I used Intel XMP settings for the RAM, getting as close to the labeled settings as the boards (or CPU) allow. I used a Kill-A-Watt meter rather than my UPS' read-out for power. With the system off, the UPS on its own draws about 6W.

I selected the Heaven 4.0 Custom Settings to try to improve appearance without killing performance on the test system's basic hardware. Removing AA seems to have helped. I ran only the sequential benchmark in CrystalDiskMark because I was interested in testing the chipset SATA and USB 3.0 throughput, not the attached drives. Similarly, I looked for bandwidth differences in the RAM.

Joe Trott is an Associate Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews motherboards, specializing in budget Intel chipsets.