Samsung Spinpoint F2 EcoGreen (HD154UI)
Samsung’s EcoGreen F2 drive was launched in late fall of 2008, but it took a while until the Korean firm shipped 1.0 and 1.5 TB capacities. Our last hard drive roundup included the 500 GB model, which did well.
The 1.5 TB capacity version delivers quicker access time, but it does not reach the same throughput: it’s 113 MB/s maximum for the 500 GB model, versus 107 MB/s for the 1,500 GB variant. The 500 GB model is also superior in I/O performance, while the 1.5 TB model is better at the various PCMark Vantage HDD tests.
The technical data reads like the WD datasheet, as the key characteristics are equal: 5,400 RPM, SATA/300 with NCQ, and a 32 MB data cache. Samsung’s drive is much lighter than the WD: 650 g vs. 730 g. However, it is specified at 5.1 W idle power, while WD lists only 3.7 W. We measured 3.5 W for WD, but 3.8 W idle power for the Samsung drive, which is much less than specified (due to low-power active idle mode initiated by the device after a certain amount of time idling).
Although Samsung’s HD154UI delivers higher maximum throughput than the WD Caviar Green WD15EADS, it cannot maintain the same average and minimum throughput as WD. However, Samsung still shines from a performance per watt standpoint, as the power requirement at various workloads is much lower than the power required by WD’s drive. The similar performance in throughput benchmark gives the Samsung drive an advantage over WD in performance per watt for streaming reads, while WD remains stronger in I/O power efficiency.
Man Western Digital its on the ball for a while... Hope they keep it up.
I think power efficiency have gone way beyond practical. Take the 2TB WD drive running it at max for 24hr per day for 1 year. You get a total usage of 6.9 x 24 x 365 / 1000 = 63kW which converts to $9 electricity for 1 year. Comparing this to insane graphics card consumption for 300, 400, 500 even 1000W+ systems. I don't see why Tom's keep on telling us HDD are going green when it really matters little in the overall PC consumption.
When I read the title I was excited, after checking out the roundup I was a little bit disappointed. I'm missing the Seagate Barracuda LP drive, which is also available in 1.5TB. Why don't you guys put this drive in the roundup as well?
When I read the title I was excited, after checking out the roundup I was a little bit disappointed. I'm missing the Seagate Barracuda LP drive, which is also available in 1.5TB. Why don't you guys put this drive in the roundup as well?
+1
please update this article with scores of the new Seagate LP Drive.
thanks
The images with the electrical boards are misplaced. It makes the Samsung look like a carefully assembled hard drive...
I think power efficiency have gone way beyond practical. Take the 2TB WD drive running it at max for 24hr per day for 1 year. You get a total usage of 6.9 x 24 x 365 / 1000 = 63kW which converts to $9 electricity for 1 year. Comparing this to insane graphics card consumption for 300, 400, 500 even 1000W+ systems. I don't see why Tom's keep on telling us HDD are going green when it really matters little in the overall PC consumption.
I was about to say the same thing. I have four HDD's running in my PC all the time but I know the power they use is negligible compared to my OC'ed quad and HD3870, especially when I run Folding@Home around 18hrs a day.
The only reason for buying a "Green" hard drive is not lower power consumption. I mean... It's not much of a difference. It is a very large percentage, but a very small number.
So you're not going to save the Planet with Green drives, unless you buy them by the hundreds for big farms. I think they should sell regular drives as Green ones, and when someone purchases one, they should plant a few trees somewhere on the Planet in their name...
For me, the only good reason for buying a Green drive would be to use it for storage because the 5400 RPM should translate into better reliability (but that's not proven yet).
the best good points of these hdd's are that they are reasonably cool, low power requirement for htpc's with a small psu and reasonably quiet. That makes them very good in the htpc market and that is where they are best for.
Yes you can use them in your regular pc as well off course but that is not the main market. I think the seagate wasn't available at the moment they started testing the disks and that is why it is not included, or they didn't got one from seagate on time.
I'm all for efficiency, but I hope people don't think that getting a "green" hard drive and saving three watts is going to "save the planet."
Tom's, thanks for doing an article with some power/temp/noise statistics -- it's great to see those numbers, when they are usually glossed over or ignored.
Now if we could just get some stats on Video Cards, or get the graphics manufacturers to produce even just 1 model of a smaller, cooler, quieter card rather than the ever-bigger, insanely hot ones.
-and to the people who said these drives won't make a difference. Yes, taken alone they won't, but that's the same with pretty much everything. The point is, it's good to see the direction of innovation headed in the low-power/temp direction, as it WILL make a difference when everyone is using the more efficient parts, which will likely last longer because they don't run at >60C. No, 3W isn't huge, but it's EASY, and with not a terrible performance loss, i think these "green" drives are great.
...Now if we could just get some stats on Video Cards, or get the graphics manufacturers to produce even just 1 model of a smaller, cooler, quieter card rather than the ever-bigger, insanely hot ones...
here you go:
Albatron HD 4830 Green 512 MB
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews [...] 4830_Green
Saving a couple of watts on a hard drive may not seem like much, until you realize that the industry sells something like 500 million units each year. If you figure an average life expectancy of about 3 years for a hard drive, that would mean that there are probably over 2 billion hard drives currently in use. Now if each hard drive uses a few less watts, the overall electrical use can really be significant.
I really want to see a review on the reliability of these 1.5TB hard drives...seems to me they all have HORRIBLE ratings at newegg...something like 25%+/- 1 star ratings and 50%+/- 5 star ratings which is horrible considering that most other hard drives are somewhere around 75%+/- 5 star ratings and 10%+/- 1 star ratings.
The amount of energy taken for all of Tom's readers to DL this article greatly dwarfs the energy saved by using eco drives of low performance that save you around ten bucks over their life span and initially cost you a lot more than regular drives of the same performance.
I really want to see a review on the reliability of these 1.5TB hard drives...seems to me they all have HORRIBLE ratings at newegg...something like 25%+/- 1 star ratings and 50%+/- 5 star ratings which is horrible considering that most other hard drives are somewhere around 75%+/- 5 star ratings and 10%+/- 1 star ratings.
Sadly, this is too true. Sold my RMA drive to my brother, don't trust these drives. Lost 750GB of emulation software. If at all considering one of these drives, add the cost of a second drive to your purchase for backup or lose big time.
perhaps it would be nice to see the power measurments on some notebook HD variants.
Power requirement most of the time means only something in the server and notebook sector.
The desktop sector can live perfectly fine with a HD that consumes 3Watts more than another one!
Yes, please do an update to include the Seagate LP drives; it's hardly worth doing an article for only 2 drives, don't'cha think?
I really want to see a review on the reliability of these 1.5TB hard drives...seems to me they all have HORRIBLE ratings at newegg...something like 25%+/- 1 star ratings and 50%+/- 5 star ratings which is horrible considering that most other hard drives are somewhere around 75%+/- 5 star ratings and 10%+/- 1 star ratings.
Normally, I don't trust NewEgg reviews at all but I have to agree with the above post. SOMETHING must be up for all these drives to get such low ratings. At first I was willing to chalk it up to the garbage 7200.11 1.5TB drives, but it's not just those bricks getting such poor ratings. And while newegg reviews are purely anecdotal, it does seem fishy.
Does anyone know where the Samsung drive can be purchased?