Toshiba launches 24TB hard drives priced up to $649 for NAS systems

Toshiba 24TB N300 and N300 Pro HDDs
(Image credit: Toshiba)

Toshiba announced the highest-capacity N300 and N300 Pro hard drive models, built for private cloud storage and network-attached storage (NAS) systems. These 24TB drives add 2TB more capacity to the company’s current largest offerings, allowing users with limited drive bays to expand their capacity by replacing drives instead of adding new systems.

Toshiba says that the N300 series supports up to 12 drive bays and has a workload rating of 180 TB/year, while the N300 Pro works with up to 24 drive bays and up to 550 TB/year workload.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • royalflush1993
    How many platters do they have?
    Reply
  • rambo919
    I wonder why they only release enterprise models of high capacity and not consumer one's..... do they think consumers will actually stream everything?
    Reply
  • tamalero
    rambo919 said:
    I wonder why they only release enterprise models of high capacity and not consumer one's..... do they think consumers will actually stream everything?
    Pretty sure the standard NAS versions are the consumer ones.. and the PRO models are for higher end.
    Then you have the ENTERPRISE disks ( EXOS, etc..) ones..
    Reply
  • emike09
    What am I missing here? Seagate Exos X24 drives are enterprise class, came out in 2023, readily available, and cost $480. Sure, they have half the write cache, but is 512MB of cache worth $180 more? Any good NAS will have an NVMe cache drive anyways.
    Reply
  • rambo919
    tamalero said:
    Pretty sure the standard NAS versions are the consumer ones.. and the PRO models are for higher end.
    Then you have the ENTERPRISE disks ( EXOS, etc..) ones..
    Yes but is the firmware properly optimized for desktop use cases? Did the degradation issue go away at some point?
    Reply
  • Drunk Ukrainian
    I'm actually drooling. I hope they'll be available in my country soon.
    Reply
  • SkyNetRising
    Drunk Ukrainian said:
    I'm actually drooling. I hope they'll be available in my country soon.
    Do you consume mechanical hard drives in your diet regularly? LOL
    Drooling is physical response to food (not inedible objects).
    Reply
  • tamalero
    rambo919 said:
    Yes but is the firmware properly optimized for desktop use cases? Did the degradation issue go away at some point?
    wait, degradation?

    Are you confusing the nighthawk models (aka for surveillance) with the standard NAS models?
    And these are not SSDs to have degradation either.. (and wasn't that Samsung?)
    Reply
  • rambo919
    tamalero said:
    wait, degradation?

    Are you confusing the nighthawk models (aka for surveillance) with the standard NAS models?
    And these are not SSDs to have degradation either.. (and wasn't that Samsung?)
    To my half remembered knowledge NAS models have a problem with standard desktop behavior.... if you don't put them in RAID they develop bad sectors faster because they are over sensitive to something and falsely think data is corrupted when it isn't. They also are over sensitive to the drive being stopped and started because their firmware assumes that they are perpetually powered on.
    Reply
  • tamalero
    rambo919 said:
    To my half remembered knowledge NAS models have a problem with standard desktop behavior.... if you don't put them in RAID they develop bad sectors faster because they are over sensitive to something and falsely think data is corrupted when it isn't. They also are over sensitive to the drive being stopped and started because their firmware assumes that they are perpetually powered on.
    I only remember that some NAS drives do not get along when packed with more than 8 because of vibration and resonance. Hence why there are PRO drives dedicated to that.
    Reply