Parallel Processing, Part 2: RAM and HDD
-
Page 1:Single Or Dual Channel RAM; Single, Dual And Quad Hard Drives
-
Page 2:RAM Parallelism: Single And Dual Channel
-
Page 3:Dual Channel To The Rescue
-
Page 4:HDD Parallelism: Single, Dual Or Quad Hard Drives
-
Page 5:Test Setup
-
Page 6:Test Results: Single, Dual, Quad Hard Drives
-
Page 7:Synthetic Benchmarks
-
Page 8:Application Benchmarks
-
Page 9:Audio/Video Benchmarks
-
Page 10:SYSmark 2007 Preview
-
Page 11:Test Results: Single Vs. Dual Channel RAM
-
Page 12:Synthetic Benchmarks
-
Page 13:Audio/Video Benchmarks
-
Page 14:SYSmark 2007 Preview
-
Page 15:Conclusion
Test Results: Single Vs. Dual Channel RAM
Let’s now answer the more important question: is dual channel memory really worth it?
3D Benchmarks

3DMark06 only cares about high graphics and CPU performance. It doesn’t seem to mind us switching the 2 GB total main memory from dual channel to single channel operation.

Call of Duty 2 runs approximately 4.2% slower on the same hardware when dual channel mode is not used.

The performance difference in Prey is very small: 1.6%.

There is even less of a difference under Quake IV.
Summary
- Single Or Dual Channel RAM; Single, Dual And Quad Hard Drives
- RAM Parallelism: Single And Dual Channel
- Dual Channel To The Rescue
- HDD Parallelism: Single, Dual Or Quad Hard Drives
- Test Setup
- Test Results: Single, Dual, Quad Hard Drives
- Synthetic Benchmarks
- Application Benchmarks
- Audio/Video Benchmarks
- SYSmark 2007 Preview
- Test Results: Single Vs. Dual Channel RAM
- Synthetic Benchmarks
- Audio/Video Benchmarks
- SYSmark 2007 Preview
- Conclusion
mmm yours memory tests don't convince me. You should run, for example, Winrar AND Lame IN PARALLEL/SIMULTANEOUS (i.e multitasking), otherwise, caches don't are flushed (and it's when dual channel really is important). Note that it's not a superflous situation; under normal use a system commonly have several huge memory applications run concurrently (word, browser whith a lot of tabs open, anti-virus, etc. )
el_bot
I seriously doubt that this score is accurate. I am using the built in graphics controller on the motherboard which is an AMD 760G chipset (ATI HD 3000 or 3200 I think). I've used Radeon HD 5450 video cards on similar systems and they give me a score of 5.4. How can a built in graphics controller give me a 5.1?
AMD Athlon II X3 435 Rana (2.9 ghz)
Asus M4A78LT-M motherboard
4 GB G.Skill DDR3-1333 (2x2GB) F3-10600CL9D-4GBNT CL9-9-9-24 1.5V
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
because if you used 2 different memory chips both will run at the speed of the lowest memory chip when you activate dual channel in your motherboard
Intel HyperThreading - leading to the "H T" on the 'Intel Inside' sticker of computers with that 875p chipset and a single core Pentium 4 processor.
It equals simulated dual core tech.
Some Core processors also have HT.
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/340555-28-intel-hyperthreading-helpful