Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy

This hierarchy was originally based on the average performance each CPU achieved in our test suite. We have since incorporated new game data into our criteria, but it should be known that any specific title will likely perform differently depending on its unique programming. Some games, for example, will be severely graphics subsystem-limited, while others may react positively to more CPU cores, larger amounts of on-die cache or even a specific architecture. We don't have access to every CPU on the market, so some of the placements are based on the results similar models deliver. Indeed, this hierarchy chart is useful as a general guideline, but certainly not as a one-size-fits-all CPU comparison resource. For that, we recommend you check out our CPU Performance Charts.

Perhaps you noticed that we split the former top tier in half, moving a handful of quad-module AMD CPUs up in the process. Recognizing that a lot of older platforms are going to be paired with graphics subsystems multiple generations old, we wanted to define the top of our range to encourage balance between host processing and complementary GPUs. At this point, anyone with a Sandy Bridge-based Core i7 would realize a gain from stepping up to Kaby Lake or Broadwell-E, for example. And putting AMD's top FX CPUs next to a handful of Core i7s and those older Core i5s represents an upgrade to their status.


MORE: All CPU Content

Intel & AMD Processor Hierarchy Chart

Search for these on Amazon, or if you prefer, search on Newegg.

Core i7-3770, -3770K, -3820, -3930K, -3960X, -3970X, -4770, -4771, -4790, -4770K, -4790K, -4820K, -4930K, -4960X, -5775C, -5820K, 5930K, -5960X, -6700K, -6700, -7700K, -7700, -6800K, -6850K, -6900K, -6950X
Core i5-7600K, -7600, -7500, -7400, -6600K, -6600, -6500, -5675C, -4690K, 4670K, -4590, -4670, -4570, -4460, -4440, -4430, -3570K, -3570, -3550

Core i7-2600, -2600K, -2700K, -965, -975 Extreme, -980X Extreme, -990X Extreme
Core i5-3470, -3450P, -3450, -3350P, -3330, 2550K, -2500K, -2500, -2450P, -2400, -2380P, -2320, -2310, -2300

FX-9590, 9370, 8370, 8350, 8320, 8300, 8150
Core i7-980, -970, -960
Core i7-870, -875K
Core i3-7350K, -7320, -7300, -7100, -4360, -4350, -4340, -4170, -4160, -4150, -4130, -3250, -3245, -3240, -3225, -3220, -3210, -2100, -2105, -2120, -2125, -2130

Pentium G4620, G4600, G4560
FX-6350, 4350
Phenom II X6 1100T BE, 1090T BE
Phenom II X4 Black Edition 980, 975

Core i7-860, -920, -930, -940, -950
Core i5-3220T, -750, -760, -2405S, -2400S
Core 2 Extreme QX9775, QX9770, QX9650
Core 2 Quad Q9650

FX-8120, 8320e, 8370e, 6200, 6300, 4170, 4300
Phenom II X6 1075T
Phenom II X4 Black Edition 970, 965, 955
A10-6800K, 6790K, 6700, 5800K, -5700, -7700K, -7800, -7850K, 7870K
A8-3850, -3870K, -5600K, 6600K, -7600, -7650K
Athlon X4 651K, 645, 641, 640, 740, 750K, 860K

Core 2 Extreme QX6850, QX6800
Core 2 Quad Q9550, Q9450, Q9400
Core i5-650, -655K, -660, -661, -670, -680
Core i3-2100T, -2120T

FX-6100, -4100, -4130
Phenom II X6 1055T, 1045T
Phenom II X4 945, 940, 920
Phenom II X3 Black Edition 720, 740
A8-5500, 6500
A6-3650, -3670K, -7400K
Athlon II X4 635, 630

Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Quad Q6700, Q9300, Q8400, Q6600, Q8300
Core 2 Duo E8600, E8500, E8400, E7600
Core i3 -530, -540, -550
Pentium G3470, G3460, G3450, G3440, G3430, G3420, G3260, G3258, G3250, G3220, G3420, G3430, G2130, G2120, G2020, G2010, G870, G860, G850, G840, G645, G640, G630

Phenom II X4 910, 910e, 810
Athlon II X4 620, 631
Athlon II X3 460
Core 2 Extreme X6800
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Core 2 Duo E8300, E8200, E8190, E7500, E7400, E6850, E6750
Pentium G620
Celeron G1630, G1620, G1610, G555, G550, G540, G530

Phenom II X4 905e, 805
Phenom II X3 710, 705e
Phenom II X2 565 BE, 560 BE, 555 BE, 550 BE, 545
Phenom X4 9950
Athlon II X3 455, 450, 445, 440, 435, 425
Core 2 Duo E7200, E6550, E7300, E6540, E6700
Pentium Dual-Core E5700, E5800, E6300, E6500, E6600, E6700
Pentium G9650

Phenom X4 9850, 9750, 9650, 9600
Phenom X3 8850, 8750
Athlon II X2 265, 260, 255, 370K
A4-7300, 6400K, 6300, 5400K, 5300, 4400, 4000, 3400, 3300
Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Core 2 Duo E4700, E4600, E6600, E4500, E6420
Pentium Dual-Core E5400, E5300, E5200, G620T
Phenom X4 9500, 9550, 9450e, 9350e
Phenom X3 8650, 8600, 8550, 8450e, 8450, 8400, 8250e
Athlon II X2 240, 245, 250
Athlon X2 7850, 7750
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, 5600+
Core 2 Duo E4400, E4300, E6400, E6320
Celeron E3300
Phenom X4 9150e, 9100e
Athlon X2 7550, 7450, 5050e, 4850e/b
Athlon 64 X2 5400+, 5200+, 5000+, 4800+
Core 2 Duo E5500, E6300
Pentium Dual-Core E2220, E2200, E2210
Celeron E3200
Athlon X2 6550, 6500, 4450e/b,
Athlon X2 4600+, 4400+, 4200+, BE-2400
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
Celeron E1600, G440
Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 3800+
Athlon X2 4050e, BE-2300
Pentium Dual-Core E2160, E2140
Celeron E1500, E1400, E1200

Currently, our hierarchy consists of 13 total tiers. The bottom half of the chart is largely outdated; you'll notice those CPUs dragging down performance in the latest games, regardless of the graphics card installed in your PC. If you own a CPU in that range, an upgrade could really take your gaming experience to another level.

Really, it's the top five tiers or so that remain viable. And in that top half of the chart, an upgrade is typically worthwhile if it's a least a couple of tiers higher. Otherwise, there's just not enough improvement to warrant the expense of a fresh CPU, motherboard and memory (not to mention the graphics card and storage solution you'd be considering as well).

MORE: Best Deals

MORE: Tom's Hardware Best Picks

MORE: How To Build A PC

MORE:Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
    Your comment
  • poxenium
    Dude, those HyperThreading Pentium G4560 processors are better than previous gen Core i3's. Hierarchy is wrong.
  • CoupDgrace
    Are the processors listed arbitrarily within each level? For example the 4770 is listed before the 4790k but then, say the 980 is listed before the 960 within the same level. So does the 4770 perform better in gaming than a 4790k? Or is it just that they all perform kinda the same so no order is important?
  • Stardude82
    Yeah, the i3's should be broken up more. Those Sandy i3s are certainly showing their age and more in line with mainstream Lynnfield (even at launch) and FX-6300 in performance.

    The promotion the quad-module Vishera chips makes no sense. They are old. They still struggle to compete with faster i3s in gaming loads let alone normal 1155 i5s.
  • blackmagnum
    I think you can delete the Core2Duo and Athlon64 chips from the table. We are now at Q1/2017.
  • Sam Hain
    The chart looks like it's in series number/in order of release, not really in order of a CPU's performance of one over another as a hierarchy chart would/should be... i.e. 3770 listed first for i7's, while some are in order of performance; i5 7600K, etc.
  • AMD-Has-Ryzen

    Where would the Pentium G4400 come on the list? I can see Kaby Lake and pre-Skylake Pentiums, but no actual Skylake Pentiums...?
  • WilliBilliBoy
    Where would the Core i5 (I5-5250U) be on this table?
  • razamatraz
    I'm thinking you might need to look at a new level in between 1 and 2. A lot of games are starting to take advantage of the i7 hyperthreads and there are significant differences showing between say an i7-7700k and an i5-3570K, both of which you have in tier 1.

    I would move all i5s below 6600k into the tier 2, and maybe the ivy bridge i7s. I would then move the 2600K, 2700K 980X and maybe the 970, FX-9590, 9370, 8370 up to the new tier 2, rather than letting them fall to tier 3.. There is too much gap between chips in those two tiers with this year's AAA games.

    All this said wait for Zen of point in tweaking the board right now when Zen might knock over the table.
  • BorgOvermind
    Would be nice to have a top of all times for video cards and CPUs. I kept such documentation a while back, but nothing in the last few years, there were just too many new products on the market to keep up.
  • Invalid_Username_Juli
    Why is there no mention of the AM1 platform at all?
  • razamatraz
    Anonymous said:
    Why is there no mention of the AM1 platform at all?

    This is a gaming chart, Kabini chips are not intended for that purpose and likely performed at a tier 6 level on release. While they make wonderful HTPCs, they are not gaming CPUs, even an Athlon 5350 really doesn't cut it.
  • clutchc
    The Hyper-threaded dual core Kaby Lake Pentiums are in the same tier as the Hyper-threaded 6-core i7-970/980? Seriously?
  • razamatraz
    I see you made some changes and actually split tier 1 and 2 into 3 tiers as I suggested earlier.. I don't think Ivy i5s do not belong in tier 1 anymore though; They are significantly outclassed in modern gaming by modern i7s. There seems to be a bit of weirdness on the Nehalam, Gulftown stuff too; The 965 and 975 are 4 core chips and they are in tier 2 while the 980 and 970 are 6 core at the same frequencies and are in tier 3?
  • WilliBilliBoy
    Add Ryzen 7.