- TUL PowerColor X700 Pro 256
- Movie Theater Video for the Masses
- MSI RX800PRO-TD256: Little Value Add, Lots of Software
- JVC Everio GZ-MC200: An Hour of DVD with No Cassette!
- Gigabyte's 3D1: Are Two Engines Better Than One?
- VGA Charts V: PCI Express Graphics Cards
- R480 and R430: ATI's Fall PCIe Update
- Gigabyte's GV-N68T256DH Graphics Card: Give the Heatsink Its Mod Due
- DVRack: Video Recording without the Tape
- The TFT Connection: Do NVIDIA and ATi Deliver?
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: nvidia, geforce, 6200, turbocache
Topics: Build Your Own, INTEL, NVIDIA
Syndication:
Half-Life 2 Performance Comparison

Aside from Intel's GMA900, all of the cards we tested offer acceptable performance in 1024x768. Nonetheless, the 16 MB GeForce 6200 TC card still doesn't exactly give cause for celebration. In 1280x1024, Half-Life 2 is unplayable on any of these cards. The two TurboCache cards, Ati's X300 SE as well as Intel's GMA900 turn in very low results.
In the lower quality settings, the GeForce PCX 5750 is able to shine. This is largely because it renders at reduced shader precision, making it faster but resulting in lower image quality compared to the other contenders. While the game remains unplayable on Intel's GMA900, all cards offer acceptable performance in 1024x768. In 1280x1024, the 16 MB GeForce 6200 TurboCache card and the Radeon X300 SE make a poor showing, bringing up the rear.
- Previous page Half-Life 2
- Next page Conclusion