Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Conclusion

ATI Radeon HD 5450: Eyefinity And HTPCs For Everyone?
By

Now that we've seen what the new Radeon HD 5450 can do, we can say that it's certainly the least awe-inspiring Radeon HD 5000-series card we've seen. But this utilitarian model was never designed to inspire. It was designed to work, to offer better-than-integrated graphics performance, to enable Eyefinity for the masses, and to give the HTPC enthusiasts bitstreaming from a passive card. And it does these things on a $50 budget.

That's a tall order given the price. It necessitates a significant functionality boost in an entry level graphics card. In this regard, the Radeon HD 5450 is certainly more impressive to those who don't necessarily care about gaming, but would give an arm and a leg for more computing desktop space. HTPC builders also have quite a bit to forward to.

But lets be frank. As impressive as these new abilities are to the folks interested in them, average buyers aren't going to realize much gain over what a Radeon HD 4550 would have facilitated. Most causal users are comfortable using one monitor; very few want to see three on their desk. And Dolby TrueHD- and DTS-HD Master Audio-compatible receivers are overall, fairly rare. Even more scattered are the folks attaching HTPCs to those components. Thus, there is little reason to run out and upgrade a Radeon HD 4550 to a new 5450 model.

Nevertheless, the Radeon HD 5450 is notable in that it raises the bar on what we expect from an entry-level graphics card, while cutting power consumption. It also sets the stage for a day when multiple-monitor support becomes the norm--long overdue in our books.

Where does the gamer fit into all this? Give our performance benchmarks, you can easily see that the similarly-priced Radeon HD 4650 is a vastly superior gaming solution. Regardless, the Radeon HD 5450 can offer passable performance in challenging titles at medium to low settings at 1280x1024. At this point, the low-budget gamer has to make a choice: do you opt for the faster card or a slower card that delivers triple-monitor gaming? Is the panoramic desktop experience worth dropping the details in your games? Certainly, games that are easy on the graphics subsystem (World of Warcraft, for example) could work on ATI's Radeon HD 5450 in triple-monitor Eyefinity mode. You don't want to play any graphically-intensive titles with this setup, though.

Spoiler alert: if you're a cost-conscious gamer faced with this choice, I'd suggest holding on just a little bit longer for AMD to launch something between the $50 Radeon HD 5450 and the $100 Radeon HD 5670. The company has already indicated that a 5500-series is forthcoming, and it is reasonable to expect such a product to offer higher performance than the Radeon HD 5450 at a lower price than the Radeon HD 5670. This is likely to be a far more desirable card for budget gamers interested in a triple-monitor Eyefinity setup.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 76 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 23 Hide
    cleeve , February 4, 2010 4:28 AM
    acasela crossfire config with this video card + overclock will make this article much better in a gamers point of view...


    Not really, look at the specs. In CrossFire these cards would cost $100 for a total 160 shader cores. They still wouldn't hold a candle to a single $100 5670 when gaming, which has 400 shader cores all by itself.

    CrossFiring the 5450 would be a total waste.
  • 22 Hide
    skora , February 4, 2010 6:05 AM
    How selfish you all are thinking THG only does gaming cards!!!! When ATI cuts the hardware (shaders/ROPs) to the bone, its not about gaming. Its for the HTPC and multi-monitor office crowd and thats it. It's a niche card and looks to do that admirably.
  • 10 Hide
    dimitrik , February 4, 2010 9:48 AM
    *Groan* Really guys? Is gaming the only thing a computer is used for?

    This card is built for a whole bunch of users who are actually far more common in real life than overgrown teenage gamers. How about desktop users who want a really quiet low power consumption PC? Maybe one which stays on 24/7 or is fitted into a super slim case? How about HTPC users who want a passively cooled card that has all the video and HD acceleration features without requiring an extra power supply or installing 120mm fans on a case to cool one of the monster 5000 series cards?

    I have been waiting for this card since the 5xxx series was announced and so has every home theater enthusiast I know. Few of them are gamers and care only about having a good looking PC that can fit in the living room and play their blu-rays and video libraries with the best PQ and AQ.

    As for the article itself - nice going THG. Write an article about a non-gaming card with only gaming benchmarks and tests. Who cares? NOBODY will buy this to play Crysis. How about some video acceleration/CPU use tests with multiple video formats instead? How about getting a non-gamer (unlike the self confessed writer - no offense) who actually knows what we care about?
Other Comments
  • 8 Hide
    popaholic , February 4, 2010 3:54 AM
    For the all the idiots out there, yes it can run Crysis, slightly.

    Whats the point of releasing a new graphics card thats worse than older cards? It runs Dx11 but there's no way it could even run a supported game.

  • -4 Hide
    Anonymous , February 4, 2010 3:54 AM
    The links to the article pages are either missing or directed wrongly. For example, the "Power and Temperature Benchmarks", "Conclusion" pages are missing or directed wrongly.
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , February 4, 2010 3:56 AM
    serokichimThe links to the article pages are either missing or directed wrongly. For example, the "Power and Temperature Benchmarks", "Conclusion" pages are missing or directed wrongly.


    Try refreshing the page. Should be working correctly now!
  • 0 Hide
    robertking82881 , February 4, 2010 4:06 AM
    well those that are not gameing but want direct x11 can pick this up
  • 23 Hide
    cleeve , February 4, 2010 4:28 AM
    acasela crossfire config with this video card + overclock will make this article much better in a gamers point of view...


    Not really, look at the specs. In CrossFire these cards would cost $100 for a total 160 shader cores. They still wouldn't hold a candle to a single $100 5670 when gaming, which has 400 shader cores all by itself.

    CrossFiring the 5450 would be a total waste.
  • -4 Hide
    masterjaw , February 4, 2010 4:43 AM
    Passively-cooled 5450 in crossfire = fail

    How do you expect it to handle the increase in temps? Even if you got some good airflow inside the case, that won't be sufficient.
  • -6 Hide
    footsoldier , February 4, 2010 5:56 AM
    Kinda failed product, ATI..focus on price drop plssss! But still, ATI rocks
  • 22 Hide
    skora , February 4, 2010 6:05 AM
    How selfish you all are thinking THG only does gaming cards!!!! When ATI cuts the hardware (shaders/ROPs) to the bone, its not about gaming. Its for the HTPC and multi-monitor office crowd and thats it. It's a niche card and looks to do that admirably.
  • 6 Hide
    shubham1401 , February 4, 2010 6:07 AM
    Lol...
    They needed a i7 and 1200W PSU to test this card... :) 

    Useless...Either get a good card or stick with integrated.
  • 7 Hide
    arkadi , February 4, 2010 6:56 AM
    Sound like a solid card for non gaming setups. To bad no AGP support. (My 8 years old HTPC just will not die). "crossfire"?! lol i guess some ppl missing the point of this card.
  • 4 Hide
    micky_lund , February 4, 2010 7:08 AM
    shubham1401Lol...They needed a i7 and 1200W PSU to test this card... Useless...Either get a good card or stick with integrated.


    yeah...its just so all the tests are the same, and aren't being capped by anything...tho they could do it with a 500w :D 
  • 0 Hide
    carlhenry , February 4, 2010 7:12 AM
    i was expecting this to be faster than the 4550 :( 
    now i'll wait a little more to see how the 5500 will fair.
    i hope it will be on par with the 9500gt and will be energy efficient. huhuhu
  • 10 Hide
    Anonymous , February 4, 2010 7:26 AM
    So it's probably worth remembering this card IS NOT aimed at playing games..If you want to play games then this card isn't for you.

    This is aimed purely at media playback and 2D applications.

    I run a number of HTPC's in my home and until this card it has been impossible to get a bitstreamed output over hdmi for bluray playback. This is currently the only card that will do that (that is low power, single slot, and half height)

    For that reason alone this should get a 5* or 10/10 rating. And I'll be buying 5 of them!

    And please try to remember that graphics cards are not all about frame rated when playing crysis.
  • -1 Hide
    killerclick , February 4, 2010 7:56 AM
    If you're on a very tight budget and want to play games, I suggest 4650. Eyefinity? Only if you need 3 monitors. dx11? You'll still be able to play dx11 games even with a dx10 card.
  • -4 Hide
    brisingamen , February 4, 2010 8:22 AM
    well crossfiring two of these bad boys isnt all a bad idea i mean they are silent,

    and slim, so they could fit in a slim htpc case. or a micro pc you could throw in your backpack or hand bag.

    plus you can run eyefinity,

    and the fact it runs on such little power you could almost plug it into your neck and run it.

    and you dont have the crossfire bridge to worry about for crossfire connection,


    im definitly a fan of acasels xfire OC idea. id like to see benches and a review of that infact.
  • -5 Hide
    yose3 , February 4, 2010 8:44 AM
    what the point of this card? remind me again why does it exist?
  • 2 Hide
    stridervm , February 4, 2010 9:01 AM
    It exists for the people who are still playing on a 1024x768 monitor but still want DX11, yes, they exist. =P
  • -1 Hide
    scrumworks , February 4, 2010 9:26 AM
    Yose3what the point of this card? remind me again why does it exist?


    How about cutting manufacturing costs doing the 55->40nm transfer and having the power consumption down.
  • 6 Hide
    JohnnyLucky , February 4, 2010 9:27 AM
    If I understood the article correctly, then it seems this card would be ideal for a quiet home theater pc.
Display more comments