Apple, Intel, and Nvidia Suppliers Halt Production in China Due to Mandated Power Shutdowns

Huawei
(Image credit: Huawei)

China is the world's largest consumer of energy, as well as the largest emitter of carbon dioxide. In a purported bid to limit energy carrier price surges and reduce its emissions, the Chinese government has temporarily shut down power to several major manufacturing hubs. The country also intends to temporarily suspend industrial electricity supply on a scheduled basis going forward. Such crackdowns will inevitably affect the global electronics supply chain as well as companies like Apple, Intel, Nvidia, Qualcomm, and Tesla. But some companies will be more severely affected than others.

Want to Cut Emissions? Cut the Power Supply!

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Giroro
    This is a bit of a head-scratcher to figure out what China is actually trying to do, because it definitely has nothing to do with emissions, the environment, or energy usage. It will likely do net harm in those categories as it causes more work overall and spikes in energy usage tend to reduce efficiency.
    The first question is: Can the lost work really be deferred to other days/shifts? Odds are that some factories are already running 24/7, and they will be hurt. China may be targeting those particular producers.

    Another interesting aspect is: "Furthermore, enterprises paying more taxes .... will not be affected by power outages"
    So this may be as simple as strong-armed mob style extortion. Or, possibly an effort to give an unfair competative edge to the companies controlled by the Chinese government.
    The Chinese government seems to be becoming very unfriendly to foreign companies and ideas, particularly in tech. It would be wise for some of these companies to pull out gracefully before Xi decides to go smash-and-grab on their facilities and IP.

    If its not already too late, that is. It has got to be very hard to withdraw investments from China ever since they seized control of Hong Kong and shut down the free market.
    Reply
  • pocketdrummer
    Maybe we should start investing in domestic manufacturing.
    🤷‍♂️
    Reply
  • Sluggotg
    Giroro said:
    This is a bit of a head-scratcher to figure out what China is actually trying to do, because it definitely has nothing to do with emissions, the environment, or energy usage. It will likely do net harm in those categories as it causes more work overall and spikes in energy usage tend to reduce efficiency.
    The first question is: Can the lost work really be deferred to other days/shifts? Odds are that some factories are already running 24/7, and they will be hurt. China may be targeting those particular producers.

    Another interesting aspect is: "Furthermore, enterprises paying more taxes .... will not be affected by power outages"
    So this may be as simple as strong-armed mob style extortion. Or, possibly an effort to give an unfair competative edge to the companies controlled by the Chinese government.
    The Chinese government seems to be becoming very unfriendly to foreign companies and ideas, particularly in tech. It would be wise for some of these companies to pull out gracefully before Xi decides to go smash-and-grab on their facilities and IP.

    If its not already too late, that is. It has got to be very hard to withdraw investments from China ever since they seized control of Hong Kong and shut down the free market.
    Hong Kong was such a nice place to go. (Very cool place in the 80s. Had a unique Vibe). Then the Commies took it back. (Taiwan may be next).
    Reply
  • hallby81
    Giroro said:
    This is a bit of a head-scratcher to figure out what China is actually trying to do, because it definitely has nothing to do with emissions, the environment, or energy usage. It will likely do net harm in those categories as it causes more work overall and spikes in energy usage tend to reduce efficiency.
    The first question is: Can the lost work really be deferred to other days/shifts? Odds are that some factories are already running 24/7, and they will be hurt. China may be targeting those particular producers.

    Another interesting aspect is: "Furthermore, enterprises paying more taxes .... will not be affected by power outages"
    So this may be as simple as strong-armed mob style extortion. Or, possibly an effort to give an unfair competative edge to the companies controlled by the Chinese government.
    The Chinese government seems to be becoming very unfriendly to foreign companies and ideas, particularly in tech. It would be wise for some of these companies to pull out gracefully before Xi decides to go smash-and-grab on their facilities and IP.

    If its not already too late, that is. It has got to be very hard to withdraw investments from China ever since they seized control of Hong Kong and shut down the free market.

    There was a story that I read about a week ago or so (can't remember the publication off the top of my head) that basically delved into how Xi sees China going forward. And it was pretty chilling what the destination is. A combination of Maoist central planning with some perverse form of market socialism. Xi is a Maoist to his core, according to this article, and the last 30 years of Chinese free market economy should now come to an end and be replaced with something that allows more controlled growth. To me, it sounds like Xi and the CCP politburo are just scared they are going to lose control of the population as the free market influences its giant middle class.
    Reply
  • Abion47
    If the affected companies lose 3 days of power consumption and then compensate with 3 nights worth of night shifts, what is this measure going to actually solve in terms of energy consumption and emissions? If anything, it's just going to make things worse.
    Reply
  • Giroro said:
    This is a bit of a head-scratcher to figure out what China is actually trying to do, because it definitely has nothing to do with emissions, the environment, or energy usage. It will likely do net harm in those categories as it causes more work overall and spikes in energy usage tend to reduce efficiency.
    Weird... if this happened here, we'd be blaming our government for being incompetent and foolish.
    But when it comes to China, we somehow automatically assume that their government can't possibly be incompetent or foolish. Deceitful, maybe, but neither incompetent nor foolish.

    I wonder why that is.
    Reply
  • Abion47 said:
    If the affected companies lose 3 days of power consumption and then compensate with 3 nights worth of night shifts, what is this measure going to actually solve in terms of energy consumption and emissions? If anything, it's just going to make things worse.
    Well, people consume less power during the night. So if a company is forced to work during the night, because they can't get power during the day, then this measure would at the very least make it easier to supply these companies with renewable (or cleaner) power sources, that would otherwise be occupied by other people during the day.

    That's assuming these companies compensate with night shifts instead of simply accept their losses, of course.
    Reply
  • valreesio
    This is as useless as daylight savings time. As others have pointed out, taking on extra shifts just shifts the energy usage to another time, it doesn't magically make it disappear. Also, giving preferential treatment (power) to those who pay more money (taxes) for it is just wrong on so many levels. But, what do you expect when dealing with China?
    Reply
  • Abion47
    Nolonar said:
    Well, people consume less power during the night. So if a company is forced to work during the night, because they can't get power during the day, then this measure would at the very least make it easier to supply these companies with renewable (or cleaner) power sources, that would otherwise be occupied by other people during the day.

    Power companies already work in cycles with more power generated during the day than at night. It's not like there's a set number of W/h that a power company is producing all the time and more of it is used during the day than at night. All this change will do is make power companies operate at a much lower consumption for 3 days then work at a much higher power consumption for 3 days and 3 nights straight afterward.
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    I'm sure the allocation of power will go to the companies with the most "social credit" and solid government connections.

    China has reached a point of development where the easy gains are behind it and the Central Planners will no longer have easy successes.

    When China was way behind the West almost any modernization decision by the Central planners would result in large gains and resulted in fantastic growth. Now the decisions are much harder, the margins tighter and the chance of damaging rather than helping are high.
    Reply