Humble THQ Bundle Concludes With Over $5 Million Earned

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • kcorp2003
    best 10 dollars i spent. miss the 1st Humble Bundle deal but oh boy i love this service. looking forward to see what other publishers will do.
    Reply
  • Loved this Humble Bundle. I could go for another PC bundle or hopefully an Xbox 360 arcade bundle perhaps including banjo kazooie and banjo tooie :D
    Reply
  • bak0n
    The corps threw big money to run up the minimum for the complete pack. It had nothing to do with giving money to the company as i'm sure it all went to charity as write offs.
    Reply
  • thanks humble bundle and thq for this awesome deal
    Reply
  • eklipz330
    thq was VERY smart with this bundle. four main reasons:

    first, to get more people excited for the new company heroes
    two, to get people into darksiders so they pick up the second one
    three, to get people excited for metro last light if they didnt already have 2033
    four, selling the saints row the third BUT NOT THE COMPLETE PACK, essentially getting people to buy more than one copy for the same game.

    this was more of an investment than anything, and will probably prevent them from bankruptcy.
    Reply
  • Shin-san
    When three of the games were Company of Heroes, I was like "Eh, I guess I can.", and I got it. I'm glad they added the other games
    Reply
  • edogawa
    Not bad, I like THQ, and I hope they don't go under.
    Reply
  • Robert Pankiw
    bak0nThe corps threw big money to run up the minimum for the complete pack. It had nothing to do with giving money to the company as i'm sure it all went to charity as write offs.
    I don't think you understand one fundamental thing. Take 5,097,550.77(Total raised) - 25000(Big spenders) = 5072550.97(Amount raised without big spenders)

    Take 885,301(Total spenders) - 15(Approx. number of big spenders) = 885286 (All except big spenders)

    Total raised / All except big spenders = 5.73

    Basically, those big spenders raised the average cost by 3 cents. Those monsters, how could they?

    P.S. AFAIK you don't get a tax receipt for donating to the Humble Bundle, which means it isn't a write off, which means they aren't the monsters I previously claimed them to be... Oh my!!
    Reply
  • eklipz330
    Robert PankiwI don't think you understand one fundamental thing. Take 5,097,550.77(Total raised) - 25000(Big spenders) = 5072550.97(Amount raised without big spenders)Take 885,301(Total spenders) - 15(Approx. number of big spenders) = 885286 (All except big spenders)Total raised / All except big spenders = 5.73Basically, those big spenders raised the average cost by 3 cents. Those monsters, how could they?P.S. AFAIK you don't get a tax receipt for donating to the Humble Bundle, which means it isn't a write off, which means they aren't the monsters I previously claimed them to be... Oh my!!actually, your logic is flawed. let's say there were only 100 sales, and one guy comes along and donates 10 grand. what do you think is going to happen? those large donations were done early enough to drive that average way up, and it eventually trickled down as the cheapos spent around 1 cent per bundle.

    i don't think it was evil of them. it was a tactical move, and it was still a deal. nothing to whine about. if you can't afford $10 for games, you probably shouldn't be gaming.
    Reply
  • Novulux
    eklipz330actually, your logic is flawed. let's say there were only 100 sales, and one guy comes along and donates 10 grand. what do you think is going to happen? those large donations were done early enough to drive that average way up, and it eventually trickled down as the cheapos spent around 1 cent per bundle.i don't think it was evil of them. it was a tactical move, and it was still a deal. nothing to whine about. if you can't afford $10 for games, you probably shouldn't be gaming.
    Minimum was $1 to actually get any games.
    Reply