LaCie Updates d2 HDD With USB 3.0, Thunderbolt

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • A Bad Day
    The only use I see in using Copperpeak with storage devices are multiple HDDs and/or SSDs in RAID. A consumer SSD is unlikely to fill a Copperpeak's bandwidth, nevertheless a HDD.
    Reply
  • danwat1234
    $300 for 3,000GB? Get real
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    There are two or three companies that charge $600-$1000 for an empty Thunderbolt PCI-E chassis box, which consist of:

    -Aluminum box with ventilation holes
    -Thunderbolt to PCI-E adapter
    -75W-100W PSU (for some of the models)
    -Thunderbolt cable (a few models don't include cable)

    Then again, maybe it's because the vast majority of the computers with a Thunderbolt port are Apple's computers, thus encouraging the manufacturers to attempt to price-gouge their customers.
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    Using Thunderbolt, you can transfer at 180 MB/s on this external HDD? And what is the current generation of Thunderbolt capable of in terms of speed? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think even USB 3.0 is capable of up to 400 MB/s. By comparison, Thunderbolt is capable of much more, I believe.
    Reply
  • The limitation is the disk itself. Were this to have a large flash disk, the transfer rates would be much higher
    Reply
  • alidan
    JOSHSKORNUsing Thunderbolt, you can transfer at 180 MB/s on this external HDD? And what is the current generation of Thunderbolt capable of in terms of speed? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think even USB 3.0 is capable of up to 400 MB/s. By comparison, Thunderbolt is capable of much more, I believe.
    hard to say because i dont know.

    thunderbolt may have less overhead than usb3 which would make it faster
    i have a usb3 external hdd, and i can say as far as read write speeds go its getting as much as it can get.

    now seek time is the part i think you would see the biggest difference through usb and through sata... and i dont know the difference there.
    Reply