Alleged RTX 4080 Time Spy and Blender Benchmarks Emerge

GeForce RTX 4080
(Image credit: Zed Wang)

The next Ada Lovelace graphics card that's due to be served up by Nvidia is the GeForce RTX 4080. Over the last few hours, there have been some interesting performance-indicative leaks claimed to feature this model, from usually reputable sources. The leaked benchmark scores show the RTX 4080 between 25% and 37% slower than the formidable RTX 4090. We must take these results with a pinch of salt, but they are worthy of closer examination.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • gg83
    The 4090 has double the Cuda cores? Holy cow!
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    So, taking AMD's numbers (with salt, soy sauce, whatever) and projecting on top of the 6950XT:

    7900XTX:
    Time Spy: 21864 x 1.5 = 32796
    Time Spy Ex: 10688 x 1.5 = 16032
    Blender median: 2134 x 1.5 = 3201

    They claimed "up to" 1.7x and this test should provide the best scaling, so those are very conservative numbers. The 4080 16GB will be $1200 and the 7900XTX $1000. This tells me the new AMD card will slot right in-between the 4090 and 4080-16GB at a lower price than the latter... While I do acknowledge the 4080 will still have better RT and it does have DLSS for whoever actually uses it... Is the loss in raster worth an extra $200 (on paper)?

    Unless someone is completely tied to nVidia's ecosystem, holy dang... I think the 4080-16GB may be DOA for most.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • helper800
    -Fran- said:
    So, taking AMD's numbers (with salt, soy sauce, whatever) and projecting on top of the 6950XT:

    7900XTX:
    Time Spy: 21864 x 1.5 = 32796
    Time Spy Ex: 10688 x 1.5 = 16032
    Blender median: 2134 x 1.5 = 3201

    They claimed "up to" 1.7x and this test should provide the best scaling, so those are very conservative numbers. The 4080 16GB will be $1200 and the 7900XTX $1000. This tells me the new AMD card will slot right in-between the 4090 and 4080-16GB at a lower price than the latter... While I do acknowledge the 4080 will still have better RT and it does have DLSS for whoever actually uses it... Is the loss in raster worth an extra $200 (on paper)?

    Unless someone is completely tied to nVidia's ecosystem, holy dang... I think the 4080-16GB may be DOA for most.

    Regards.
    DLSS for me is used in every game that has it if i get under 120fps on 1% lows. Quality DLSS is almost indistinguishable without staring at very specific things in backgrounds.
    Reply
  • sizzling
    helper800 said:
    DLSS for me is used in every game that has it if i get under 120fps on 1% lows. Quality DLSS is almost indistinguishable without staring at very specific things in backgrounds.
    Same here
    Reply
  • spentshells
    The core count between the 4090 and 4080 leaves little in the way of new models... 4081, 4082?
    Reply
  • Ogotai
    considering i only have 1 game that supports RT or DLSS, if radeon has better raster performance then the rtx 40 series, looks like i will be picking up a radeon to finally upgrade my 1060.

    that and the part of the melting connector :-) which a few people i know are going to either postpone, or skip the rtx 40 series because of that connector
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    helper800 said:
    DLSS for me is used in every game that has it if i get under 120fps on 1% lows. Quality DLSS is almost indistinguishable without staring at very specific things in backgrounds.

    correct, the 4080 could be double the 7900 perf and I’d still buy AMD to not get a fire/damaged home.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    It's looking like this card will be a gaming beast at 1440P.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Sleepy_Hollowed said:
    correct, the 4080 could be double the 7900 perf and I’d still buy AMD to not get a fire/damaged home.
    I like the funny meme reactions to things but when people start believing the meme to be something that is reality is when I start hating social interaction. It will be nearly impossible for this connector to start a fire and a magnitude higher than that for it to lead to fire. The 4000 series problems will be resolved eventually. I certainly wont be an early adapter, but not because my house will burn down, but because I like it when my multi thousand dollar machine doesn't potentially need a new GPU due to Nvidia's oversights.
    Reply
  • tresnugget
    These benchmarks are likely fake. There would never be a larger boost in performance at 1440p than at 4k. It's saying there's a 32% boost in performance going from the 3090 Ti to the 4080 at 1440p in Time Spy but in Time Spy Extreme at 4k where there would be a GPU bottleneck instead of a CPU bottleneck there's only a 26% boost. Makes 0 sense.
    Reply