Alleged RTX 4080 Time Spy and Blender Benchmarks Emerge
Both sets of results fall in line with expectations.
The next Ada Lovelace graphics card that's due to be served up by Nvidia is the GeForce RTX 4080. Over the last few hours, there have been some interesting performance-indicative leaks claimed to feature this model, from usually reputable sources. The leaked benchmark scores show the RTX 4080 between 25% and 37% slower than the formidable RTX 4090. We must take these results with a pinch of salt, but they are worthy of closer examination.
Twitter user @Zed_Wang published screenshots apparently taken from 3DMark benchmark runs. 3DMark benchmarks provide an indicative gaming performance score, as they run through a fixed path within UL Benchmark’s tuned graphics engine. We have both the Time Spy DX12 benchmark and Time Spy Extreme 4K DX12 benchmark scores to ponder over and compare. The RTX 4090 appears to be respectively 25% faster and 37% faster than the 4080 in these comparisons. If accurate, these results indicate that the RTX 4090’s advantages over the RTX 4080 are most apparent in higher-resolution gaming situations, at 4K or better.
For another perspective on RTX 4080 performance, seasoned leaker @Tum Apisak has shared what is purported to be a Blender benchmark run score. Blender is a free and open source 3D modelling application, so GPUs are useful in this situation for accelerating scene previews and rendered stills or animations. Additionally it supports GPU ray tracing hardware, so it helps to weight the relative potency of this aspect of a GPU. According to the Blender data, the upcoming RTX 4080 is going to be approx 28% slower than the flagship RTX 4090.
RTX 4090 |
RTX 4080 |
RTX 3090 Ti |
RTX 3080 | RX 6950 XT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time Spy |
35704 |
28599 |
21705 |
17656 |
21864 |
Time Spy Ex |
19467 |
14178 |
11291 |
8898 |
10688 |
Blender median |
12106 |
9479 |
6280 |
5023 |
2134 |
For a broader comparison, we have put the leaked benchmarking scores in the above table, alongside known performers like the RTX 3090 Ti and RTX 3080, as well as AMD’s Radeon RX 6950 XT for some red-on-green fun.
We have the official specs for both the GeForce RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 from the September launch event. At launch, there were two RTX 4080 models announced, but Nvidia has since trimmed it down to one. You can check out an extensive specs comparison in the linked story. But in essence, the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 compare as per the table below.
Nvidia GeForce |
RTX 4090 |
RTX 4080 |
---|---|---|
CUDA Cores |
16384 |
9728 |
RT Cores |
128 |
76 |
Boost Clock (GHz) |
2.52 |
2.51 |
Memory Size |
24 GB |
16 GB |
Memory Bus |
384-bit |
256-bit |
Memory Type |
GDDR6X 21 Gbps |
GDDR6X 22.4 Gbps |
Nvidia plans to launch the GeForce RTX 4080 on November 16, at $1,199. Expect a full and extensive review of the RTX 4080 for you to digest around the launch date.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
-Fran- So, taking AMD's numbers (with salt, soy sauce, whatever) and projecting on top of the 6950XT:Reply
7900XTX:
Time Spy: 21864 x 1.5 = 32796
Time Spy Ex: 10688 x 1.5 = 16032
Blender median: 2134 x 1.5 = 3201
They claimed "up to" 1.7x and this test should provide the best scaling, so those are very conservative numbers. The 4080 16GB will be $1200 and the 7900XTX $1000. This tells me the new AMD card will slot right in-between the 4090 and 4080-16GB at a lower price than the latter... While I do acknowledge the 4080 will still have better RT and it does have DLSS for whoever actually uses it... Is the loss in raster worth an extra $200 (on paper)?
Unless someone is completely tied to nVidia's ecosystem, holy dang... I think the 4080-16GB may be DOA for most.
Regards. -
helper800
DLSS for me is used in every game that has it if i get under 120fps on 1% lows. Quality DLSS is almost indistinguishable without staring at very specific things in backgrounds.-Fran- said:So, taking AMD's numbers (with salt, soy sauce, whatever) and projecting on top of the 6950XT:
7900XTX:
Time Spy: 21864 x 1.5 = 32796
Time Spy Ex: 10688 x 1.5 = 16032
Blender median: 2134 x 1.5 = 3201
They claimed "up to" 1.7x and this test should provide the best scaling, so those are very conservative numbers. The 4080 16GB will be $1200 and the 7900XTX $1000. This tells me the new AMD card will slot right in-between the 4090 and 4080-16GB at a lower price than the latter... While I do acknowledge the 4080 will still have better RT and it does have DLSS for whoever actually uses it... Is the loss in raster worth an extra $200 (on paper)?
Unless someone is completely tied to nVidia's ecosystem, holy dang... I think the 4080-16GB may be DOA for most.
Regards. -
sizzling
Same herehelper800 said:DLSS for me is used in every game that has it if i get under 120fps on 1% lows. Quality DLSS is almost indistinguishable without staring at very specific things in backgrounds. -
spentshells The core count between the 4090 and 4080 leaves little in the way of new models... 4081, 4082?Reply -
Ogotai considering i only have 1 game that supports RT or DLSS, if radeon has better raster performance then the rtx 40 series, looks like i will be picking up a radeon to finally upgrade my 1060.Reply
that and the part of the melting connector :-) which a few people i know are going to either postpone, or skip the rtx 40 series because of that connector -
Sleepy_Hollowed helper800 said:DLSS for me is used in every game that has it if i get under 120fps on 1% lows. Quality DLSS is almost indistinguishable without staring at very specific things in backgrounds.
correct, the 4080 could be double the 7900 perf and I’d still buy AMD to not get a fire/damaged home. -
helper800
I like the funny meme reactions to things but when people start believing the meme to be something that is reality is when I start hating social interaction. It will be nearly impossible for this connector to start a fire and a magnitude higher than that for it to lead to fire. The 4000 series problems will be resolved eventually. I certainly wont be an early adapter, but not because my house will burn down, but because I like it when my multi thousand dollar machine doesn't potentially need a new GPU due to Nvidia's oversights.Sleepy_Hollowed said:correct, the 4080 could be double the 7900 perf and I’d still buy AMD to not get a fire/damaged home. -
tresnugget These benchmarks are likely fake. There would never be a larger boost in performance at 1440p than at 4k. It's saying there's a 32% boost in performance going from the 3090 Ti to the 4080 at 1440p in Time Spy but in Time Spy Extreme at 4k where there would be a GPU bottleneck instead of a CPU bottleneck there's only a 26% boost. Makes 0 sense.Reply