AMD Drops 24 Percent After Low Revenue and Guidance, Crypto Crash

AMD's third-quarter earnings report wasn't as promising as expected, which sent shares tumbling 24% in after-hours trading. AMD blamed the lower-than-expected revenue and guidance on a sharp downturn in the graphics market, which was largely fueled by the collapse of the cryptocurrency/blockchain market. The massive downturn in GPU sales left AMD's channel overstocked with inventory, which AMD CEO Lisa Su says could take 'several quarters' to correct. This comes after the company largely avoided the pitfalls of the crashing cryptocurrency market earlier this year. Overall, the company's $1.65B in revenue represented a 4% year-over-year (YoY) increase, but a 6% decline over the previous quarter. 

AMD also predicted $1.45B in revenue next quarter, which falls short of consensus estimates of $1.6B.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • elbert
    Seems AMD never got its bread and butter GPU's back to original asking price. The RX 570 launched at $169 but still hovers around $200. This not to mention the need for a discount due to GPU's age. AMD made it easy for cryptocurrency GPU's to be sold on ebay at their once regular price. The RX 580 has only recently returned to its regular price for the 8 GB version. For the past 2ish months the RX 580 4GB version had hovered around the price point of the 8GB version. This played into Nvidia's hands as the 1050ti has been occupying the RX 570 price point for months. Nvidia had the Turing coming so they was happy to focus on getting their high end cards back to regular price. I can only guess AMD expected cryptocurrency to pick up again.
    Reply
  • s1mon7
    Still not bad, shows that their CPUs are going strong.

    They clearly need a new Zen in the GPU space. Something that could be competitive across all tiers, not just lower mid-range. I understand that they had to make major compromises before, but now they seem to be in a position to invest back into their GPUs. The high end is where the margins and brand-building products are. I think Nvidia gave them an opening by making their lowest raw performance increase over time with Turing (while costing Nvidia much to manufacture and taking a hit to power efficiency). I hope AMD have something around the corner to take advantage of that, as with future Nvidia gens likely being faster and Intel entering the GPU space, AMD won't have a better time to strike back than now.
    Reply
  • d33dave
    stop the auto play video garbage
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    It doesn't help when there are speculators in the financial industry who are essentially sabotaging AMD's position and earnings by making negative projections about them in opinion pieces and heaping praise on Intel when the latter hasn't done anything but struggle as of late. Where's 10nm? Where's the new architecture?

    The tech industry apparently hasn't any interest in seeing AMD succeed and Intel fail. Anything and everything to keep Intel at the top or so it would seem.
    Reply
  • mindbreaker
    AMD at a fantastic bargain. They miss revenue expectation by 14% so they drop 31%...how does that fit? I think we will be getting that 17% back soon. Cripto was blown way out of proportion. It was low single figure % of sales last time, not a big deal if that is lower. Other things were up above expectation like the enterprise embedded and semi-custom sales which was $715 million, while $653 million was expected.

    I bought after hours.
    Reply
  • mlee 2500
    21430017 said:
    AMD at a fantastic bargain. They miss revenue expectation by 14% so they drop 31%...how does that fit? I think we will be getting that 17% back soon. Cripto was blown way out of proportion. It was low single figure % of sales last time, not a big deal if that is lower. Other things were up above expectation like the enterprise embedded and semi-custom sales which was $715 million, while $653 million was expected.

    I bought after hours.

    Probably not a bad investment...I'll admit that I considered it when I saw the ticker today.

    What's attractive to me is that there are so MANY ways this company can have an upside if they just execute; they could make serious inroads in the data center, they could possibly become performance-competitive with Intel in the higher margin end of consumer desktop silicon, they are still a recognized brand in the GPU market if they can just regain product parity with the competition, they seem to be developing the same sort of lucrative IP licensing revenue model which has worked out so well for Qualcomm, and the console SOC market is theirs to lose.

    Of course execution is the key phrase here, and semiconductor development is an expensive and complicated proposition, even if you're fabless. So much so that a "mere" $1.6BN in revenue might not be enough to pursue all the opportunities they have in front of them. Their competitors either have a narrower product focus (NVIDIA), or ALLOT more cash to invest (Intel). Heck, NVIDIA has both of those things.

    Still, AMD has come to market with a remarkable array of diverse products with apparently allot less investment. As someone who has worked in that space I'm not certain how they do it.
    Reply
  • ElectrO_90
    All of American companies are in trouble right now with 6 days straight of declining Nasdaq.
    AMD is not falling because of just missed targets, it is being exagerated by the collapse of the current trading being done in America.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    21430097 said:
    All of American companies are in trouble right now with 6 days straight of declining Nasdaq.
    They're not "in trouble" because of that. The valuations were too high. This is simply an overdue market correction.

    AMD, in particular, was priced virtually beyond perfection. In other words, they had no plausible path towards a P/E that would justify their recent valuations. Even after the drop, it's probably still overvalued.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    BTW, GPU makers getting caught out by the inevitable crypto crash should've surprised exactly no one.

    Anyway, just imagine how much worse it could've been if Nvidia launched a 2060 or 2050 GPU that were competitively priced.

    IMO, Vega is probably AMD's biggest pain point. I feel like Polaris is still competitive in the lower-end, which is probably why they're doing a refresh.
    Reply
  • nsomniac
    They should just invest 200billion into crypto, it would drive the price of the currency and encourage more growth in their GPU business, it would also be a good show of faith in something that causes people to buy the cards hand over fist
    Reply