AMD Earnings Soar on Exploding Ryzen Growth, Crypto Mining Craze

AMD's Q1 2018 financial report is impressive in almost every respect. Quarterly revenue increased 40% year-over-year to a healthy $1.65 billion, marking the third consecutive quarter of double-digit revenue growth. The growth is largely driven by Ryzen and Radeon chip sales that contributed to $81 million in profit during the quarter. That's a nice improvement over the $31 million loss in the same quarter last year.

Better yet, AMD is forecasting 50% YoY revenue growth for the next quarter and 20% revenue growth for the year, which suggests the company is just hitting its stride. The company is also busy plotting a course for the future: it already has 7nm GPUs in its labs fabbed on TSMC's silicon and 7nm EPYC 2 processors in development. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • bit_user
    On Newegg, 8 GB RX 580's are going for as little as $350. 4 GB RX 560's for $150 ($135 after rebate).

    The Vega's still command a bigger premium, but you can get a GTX 1080 for about $600. We're getting there (and this pricing has held for at least a couple weeks).

    Now, if the RAM prices would do the same...
    Reply
  • mihen
    In a period when AMD literally cannot produce enough chips, they are still not able to eclipse nVidia's revenue including CPU sales.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    20917833 said:
    In a period when AMD literally cannot produce enough chips, they are still not able to eclipse nVidia's revenue including CPU sales.
    Look at the margins, though. Nvidia is selling V100's for nearly $10k each! It's all because Volta sits unopposed.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    7nm EPYC sampling to customers by the end of the year, shipping early next... sounds like everything is still on track for significant 7nm launches in 2019. Intel might fall behind.
    Reply
  • ml.imaging
    This is wonderful news for everyone interested in PC building. Now if AMD could offer AMD compatible RAM bundles with their CPUs this would make for additional profits for AMD and savings for us also. (:>)
    Rehards.
    Mike
    Reply
  • Kahless01
    id like to add buy a new ryzen from them soon. but them being viable again can only help all of us. hopefully they get big enough that they can grow again in austin and a bunch of good paying jobs open up. they all but closed down here.
    Reply
  • JamesSneed
    20918496 said:
    7nm EPYC sampling to customers by the end of the year, shipping early next... sounds like everything is still on track for significant 7nm launches in 2019. Intel might fall behind.

    Yeah that is very exciting news. This is the end game for Zen's design as it is supposed to resolve the lower obtainable frequencies vs Intel chips on top of its 7nm so better densities etc. This is going to be huge deal if they can stay on target as they will be ramping up 7nm right around the time Intel's 10nm ramps up.
    Reply
  • TJ Hooker
    Woohoo, their stock actually went up (presumably in response to this news?) too!
    Reply
  • cryoburner
    20917760 said:
    On Newegg, 8 GB RX 580's are going for as little as $350...
    Graphics card prices have certainly been improving, but I'm not sure I would consider $350 for an RX 580 as being particularly good. The 8GB version launched for $229, and the 4GB version for $199, so we're still looking at prices more than $100 over MSRP for those cards. The prices are thankfully trending downward at least, and they will hopefully come close to where they were a year ago in the coming months.

    And while RAM prices are high, it's still possible for someone to make do with 8GB and get good performance in the vast majority of existing games and applications. If anything, RAM prices back in 2016 were abnormally low. Sure, you could get 16GB of relatively fast DDR4 for around $70, but most people didn't actually need that much. I'm sure there are lots of people who put more RAM than necessary in their system at that time, and still haven't even touched more than half of it. I can't help but think that if pricing hadn't been lowered so much at that time, supplies might have been better now.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    20920640 said:
    I'm sure there are lots of people who put more RAM than necessary in their system at that time, and still haven't even touched more than half of it.
    I have 32GB of RAM and most of it is always in use, ~15GB specifically allocated to the boatload of software I have open most of the time and the rest to the file system cache so software rarely needs to reload stuff from HDD after the first time. If you count file system cache as use of RAM, 16GB is a very reasonable amount to have for comfort and most people with 16GB are likely using most of it. I know playing WoW and most other games without enough RAM to keep all of the frequently used world data cached is a patience-sapping exercise when running from HDD. Non-issue with enough RAM to cache the thing.
    Reply