Apple Mulls Using 3D NAND from Chinese Supplier YMTC

YMTC
(Image credit: YMTC)

Apple is reportedly considering adding China-based Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. (YMTC) to its list of 3D NAND memory producers to diversify its supply chain and protect against sudden interruptions. YMTC would hardly become a major Apple supplier, but adoption of its memory by one of the world's largest makers of electronics will be a huge step forward for the Chinese semiconductor industry.

Apple Needs More 3D NAND

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • gg83
    Wouldn't the nand be on an older node than non-chinese suppliers?
    Reply
  • King_V
    I feel like an obvious "what could possibly go wrong?" bit of sarcasm is required here.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    protect against sudden interruptions.
    yeah...seeing as China plans to invade Taiwan that sudden disruption is gonna happen.

    also how do you validate the quality/performance between devices with different parts?
    Reply
  • hotaru251 said:
    how do you validate the quality/performance between devices with different parts?
    You define a test that the device must pass, of course.

    For example, "the device must achieve a specific score by running a specific benchmark for some specified number of hours before running out of battery at a specified ambient temperature"

    It's really not that hard, and devices with different parts have been around since forever. Even gaming consoles can have different parts (usually the disk drive).
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    Is YMTC still stacking NAND cells on CMOS combining 2 different wafers or have they finally got a CMOS under array on a single wafer part of their process? If they are doing the prior still not sure how they can be cost competitive.
    Its TLC cells so 600-2000 cycles, if the reliability is there and it is the cheapest, makes sense from an Apple margin point of view. Its a small market (Hynix, Samsung, Kioxia, Micron and these new up & comers).

    From what I can see on alibaba looks like the cells are only rated for 600 cycles, so at the minimum for a TLC. At $150 I think I would rather pick up SN850, but apple surely has a volume contract and likely there own controller and integration putting the price in favorable light to make the switch and qualify it up.
    Reply
  • Darkbreeze
    This wouldn't be surprising. Apple has only ever cared about Apple anyhow.
    Reply