Apple Claims Rights to ''Saveless'' Documents

57

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • Because that's never been done before...
    Reply
  • Camikazi
    So they patented autosave, am I wrong or isn't that exactly what Google Docs does now and Word has been doing for a long time now?
    Reply
  • sixdegree
    Apple is delusional. The ones with the right to claim "saveless" document as a feature would be electric companies. They have offered this feature since 15 years ago.
    Reply
  • Branden
    ummm.... microstation's dgn files have had all this for at least the past 12 years (probably longer, but i hadn't touched microstation before then). every single change was saved in real-time, no need to remember to save it yourself, and every change was logged in the file also - enabling you to potentially "undo changes" all the way to when the dgn was created (even if the file was opened and closed several times by different users since its creation).

    nothing revolutionary here.
    Reply
  • mortsmi7
    They patented the autosave...
    Reply
  • Camikazi
    Brandenummm.... microstation's dgn files have had all this for at least the past 12 years (probably longer, but i hadn't touched microstation before then). every single change was saved in real-time, no need to remember to save it yourself, and every change was logged in the file also - enabling you to potentially "undo changes" all the way to when the dgn was created (even if the file was opened and closed several times by different users since its creation).nothing revolutionary here.No, nothing revolutionary but they will sue everyone who does this anyway :(
    Reply
  • sinfulpotato
    Prior art. If they get awarded this... ugh.
    Reply
  • Shotzo
    Prior art: Microsoft OneNote. =/
    Reply
  • teh_chem
    Filed June 2011? Surely if they ever wanted to exercise this patent, it would be immediately invalidated by all of the prior art? Unless they bought all associated IP from, say, Microsoft...
    Reply
  • JohnnyLucky
    Seems like it is just another example of a broken patent system.
    Reply