Intel Broadwell Chip Release Pushed Back to 1Q 2014

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • xaephod
    We have any info on the Broadwell chips and how they will compare to Haswell?
    Reply
  • Memnarchon
    The title is misleading. The production was pushed back and not the release...
    Reply
  • spookyman
    so will it have the a solder on cap or the thick paste they used.
    Reply
  • anxiousinfusion
    "Skylake, the PC chip to follow Broadwell, won't be delayed, he said."

    That's a pretty bold promise to make. How can he possibly be sure that something *won't* go wrong?
    Reply
  • coolitic
    I read this right after the article of Windows 8 Ends Support In 2 Years.
    Both articles have misleading titles and tomshardware needs to fix it.
    Reply
  • rrbronstein
    11733057 said:
    We have any info on the Broadwell chips and how they will compare to Haswell?

    i can guarantee a minor performance improvement of 5-10% hehe :)
    Reply
  • JD88
    11733112 said:
    "Skylake, the PC chip to follow Broadwell, won't be delayed, he said."

    That's a pretty bold promise to make. How can he possibly be sure that something *won't* go wrong?

    It's a lot less likely because it will also be made on the same 14nm process.
    Reply
  • JD88
    11733176 said:
    I read this right after the article of Windows 8 Ends Support In 2 Years.
    Both articles have misleading titles and tomshardware needs to fix it.

    If you'll notice both of these articles have the same author.

    Kevin does this all the time. Embellishes or adds emphasis in places in order to make the article seem more relevant or newsworthy.

    He posted the Surface Pro article earlier which was also inaccurate in terms of content and mistakenly listed the Surface 2 as costing less than $100.

    This is not the quality journalism that Toms is known for.
    Reply
  • dgingeri
    Yeah, right, they're pushing it back because of an issue. The real reason they're pushing it back is because they don't have any competition and can slow down their development cycle and make more money from their current designs. Once again, we're stuck with slower advancement because AMD hasn't been able to keep up.
    Reply
  • digiex
    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20131015230058_Intel_Delays_Mass_Production_of_Next_Generation_Microprocessor_by_One_Quarter.html

    FTW!
    Reply