Skip to main content

Firefox Leads Other Browsers With New Tracking Protection For Private Browsing

Firefox now comes built-in with tracking protection currently offered by no other browser, including Chrome, Edge or Safari. The tracking protection is available for all platforms on which Firefox exists, including Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and Android.

Firefox is usually considered the most privacy-sensitive browser out there because of its open source roots and ideals. It's also the reason why the Tor Project preferred it over Chromium (which is mostly developed by Google) despite the fact that as of right now, Chromium and Chrome still have a better security architecture. However, Firefox is also supposed to get a partial sandboxing architecture in the near future, facilitated by the deprecating of the old and more intrusive add-on model.

Mozilla's engineers showed earlier this year that when the Tracking Protection feature is enabled, it can reduce page load time by up to 44 percent. Therefore, it's not just a privacy feature -- it's also a performance feature. Too many websites on the Web today include all sorts of trackers, which means tens or hundreds of third-party web requests can be made when the user tries to access a page, which slows loading times.

There is discussion right now in the advertising world about how to deal with the increasingly heavier ads on the Web, which also make pages much slower than they should be. This is part of the "Acceptable Ads" initiative that Google and others have joined, but there doesn't seem to be any initiative for "acceptable tracking," right now -- at least not one supported by the advertisers.

The EFF and a few other groups has proposed new Do Not Track policies that set the ground rules for how tracking should work on the Web. Unlike the last time DNT was proposed and was completely optional for advertisers, the new DNT policies will be enforced by several anti-tracking tools that support them, including EFF's Privacy Badger and Disconnect.

Firefox's new Tracking Protection could also push advertisers to want to deal with this issue, too, just like increased ad-blocking is getting them to consider the "Acceptable Ads" initiative.

Safari could be next in line to get such tracking protection. Apple's browser got a "Reader mode" a few years back, which would dispense of all ads and other elements on a page to clean it up and leave only the text. In that context, adding tracking protection seems like a smaller step that they could also take.

For now, Mozilla doesn't allow this Tracking Protection to be enabled by default on Firefox. You can only enable it in the private browsing mode in the latest version of Firefox (v42). It's still a big improvement, though, and if more people use it, the organization may allow it for regular browser windows, too.

Mozilla has also been supportive of the Tor Browser, and perhaps one day we could get a truly private browsing mode in Firefox by enabling Tor anonymity (which would be a much more powerful type of tracking protection).

______________________________________________________________________

Lucian Armasu joined Tom’s Hardware in early 2014. He writes news stories on mobile, chipsets, security, privacy, and anything else that might be of interest to him from the technology world. Outside of Tom’s Hardware, he dreams of becoming an entrepreneur.

You can follow him at @lucian_armasu. Follow us on Facebook, Google+, RSS, Twitter and YouTube.

  • jimmysmitty
    Firefox now comes built-in with tracking protection currently offered by no other browser

    This is a bit misleading because IE, since version 9, has had Tracking Protection built in. It is done via lists. Either you create your own TPL list or you use one of the few available (there is one by the same people who make the AdBlock Plus ad blocker).

    http://www.thewindowsclub.com/tracking-protection-list-internet-explorer
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    considering MS's new "track EVERYTHING" policy i'd be willing to bet that little feature is somehow missing from the new browser that replaced IE.

    considering google is the king of tracking and selling user data, i doubt chrome or anything else related to google will ever see any kind of privacy features such as these. sure there are add-ons for some of the other browsers but it's nice to know someone is actually working on native built in features to help protect users.

    way to go FF. i still use it and look forward to seeing what this new feature can do.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    16892318 said:
    considering MS's new "track EVERYTHING" policy i'd be willing to bet that little feature is somehow missing from the new browser that replaced IE.

    considering google is the king of tracking and selling user data, i doubt chrome or anything else related to google will ever see any kind of privacy features such as these. sure there are add-ons for some of the other browsers but it's nice to know someone is actually working on native built in features to help protect users.

    way to go FF. i still use it and look forward to seeing what this new feature can do.

    Considering that Edge is 10 exclusive and 10 is not taking over the massive market share yet it is not as relevant since most people still use IE is they use a MS browser.

    It is not in Edge but then again Edge it a HTML5 only browser with limited Flash support (due to backwards compatibility).

    However IE11 is still in Windows 10 and I still use it for certain things since Edge still has some kinks.
    Reply
  • JackNaylorPE
    Good to see Mozilla folks continuing the fight against Google and MS for tracking and selling our private info. And while I expect MS Browser (Edge / IE) prolly take scare of the web activity tracking, I'm anxious to see how they can report the contents on your HDs ... and, of course, how that can be blocked.
    Reply
  • eodeo
    This Firefox is the slowest. Memory balloons to over a gig (not really a problem for my 16gb system) but firefox slows down to a crawl and I just have to shut it down and start it again.
    Reply
  • JackNaylorPE
    I haven't experienced that. Systems is on it's 3rd day since last reboot, firefox been open whole time with about 10 hours of usage each day and I'm at 740MB. I generally max out at about 12 tabs and, if anything, it's snappier than v41. I have privacy on and adblocker addon enabled
    Reply
  • ChronosVRdS
    This Firefox is the slowest. Memory balloons to over a gig (not really a problem for my 16gb system) but firefox slows down to a crawl and I just have to shut it down and start it again.
    Not even near the amount of memory consumed by chrome! I use both and with an average of 15 tabs per browser, at this moment the "stats for nerds" of chrome shows:
    Chrome: 1,738,002k Firefox: 446,944k
    Reply
  • JackNaylorPE
    Hey, it costs a lotta juice to track all your activities, data mine them and create the data stream necessary to collect and get that data to corporations so they can sell you MORE STUFF ! :0
    Reply
  • gangrel
    Had to wait til today; it just showed up in the Ubuntu repo updates. Using it for this. Hard to say for sure, but it definitely seemed to load the front page here faster. And if it's smaller, that will be nice. I'd moved away from FF; it seemed more bloated. But if this reduces memory footprint, I'll use it again.
    Reply
  • eodeo
    16895843 said:
    This Firefox is the slowest. Memory balloons to over a gig (not really a problem for my 16gb system) but firefox slows down to a crawl and I just have to shut it down and start it again.
    Not even near the amount of memory consumed by chrome! I use both and with an average of 15 tabs per browser, at this moment the "stats for nerds" of chrome shows:
    Chrome: 1,738,002k Firefox: 446,944k

    I have multiple tab groups with 200+ tabs. Not really a problem for firefox 41, but it became unusable in 42. I had to downgrade to 41 to continue surfing. I'll check 43+ when it ships. 42 would use 2gb of ram on a single long page loaded and slow down so I cant even close that tab or change it. 41 works as expected now.

    Reply