Intel's Alder Lake i9-12900KS Available at Newegg: All Specs Revealed

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

Newegg, one of the major U.S. retailers, has started selling Intel's new top-of-the-range Alder Lake desktop processor, the Core i9-12900KS. The new CPU costs $799.99 (as noticed by @momomo_us), which is $185 higher than the price of Intel's Core i9-12900K. The key difference between this and the regular model are higher clocks and a new boost mode. 

The new Intel Core i9-12900KS belongs to the Alder Lake family and has eight high-performance Golden Cove cores clocked at 3.40 GHz base frequency, eight energy-efficient Gracemont cores clocked at 2.50 GHz base frequency, Intel's UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU, 14MB L2 cache, and 30MB L3 cache. The chip comes with unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked on Intel Z690 motherboards.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • King_V
    36% more money for . . at best . . 6% more clock speed, which means less than 6% more performance in real-world usage?

    Hard pass.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Proof Intel hasn't really changed, from it's pre Ryzen shenanigans.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    This is the price premium newegg puts on top of the price intel asks for.
    We will have to wait for official intel pricing to start demonizing them.
    Not that official prices mean much anymore with all the scalping going on but still.
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    TerryLaze said:
    This is the price premium newegg puts on top of the price intel asks for.
    We will have to wait for official intel pricing to start demonizing them.
    Not that official prices mean much anymore with all the scalping going on but still.

    I would demonize them regardless. The regular 12900k is absurdly priced, compared to the 12700k. $225 for 4 more E cores is simply not worth it, and now with the KS model, that price gap goes even further.
    Reply
  • King_V
    TerryLaze said:
    This is the price premium newegg puts on top of the price intel asks for.
    We will have to wait for official intel pricing to start demonizing them.
    Not that official prices mean much anymore with all the scalping going on but still.

    Uh, no, not really. Whatever Newegg's sins, this isn't on them.

    From 10 days ago: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i9-12900ks-already-in-customer-hands
    Pricing was not listed, but reports have indicated the 12900KS could sell well north of $750, making it an even worse buy than its i9-12900K twin if you are looking for a good value.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    King_V said:
    Uh, no, not really. Whatever Newegg's sins, this isn't on them.

    From 10 days ago: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i9-12900ks-already-in-customer-hands
    The reports:
    "The boxed (BX8071512900KSP5) and tray version (CM8071504569915) sell for $791.74 and $780.79, respectively, at Bottom Line Telecommunications. "

    It's just another retailer putting a bonus on a product they aren't allowed to sell yet.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    There's going to be peeps with more money than brains that go out and purchase this cpu for a gaming build.
    Reply
  • Liquidrider
    TerryLaze said:
    This is the price premium newegg puts on top of the price intel asks for.
    We will have to wait for official intel pricing to start demonizing them.
    Not that official prices mean much anymore with all the scalping going on but still.

    Where in the world did you come up with that logic? Newegg doesn't stack on a premium. They receive a % of whatever is sold. It's purely up to the seller not newegg.
    As for scalping, that's happening on GPUs, not CPUs.

    Let us forget the price for a second. These performance gains are so abysmal, the only thing making it a new CPU is the model number. I won't even be shocked if some 12900K are faster than the 12900KS.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    King_V said:
    36% more money for . . at best . . 6% more clock speed, which means less than 6% more performance in real-world usage?

    Hard pass.
    And if it was released at $589 you were waiting with money in hand, right?
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    logainofhades said:
    I would demonize them regardless. The regular 12900k is absurdly priced, compared to the 12700k. $225 for 4 more E cores is simply not worth it, and now with the KS model, that price gap goes even further.
    Indeed another textbook example of PCMR negativity. 12900k was not absurdly priced compared to the competition at the time. The 12700k was just priced that much better. But rather than give credit for pricing the midrange CPU's so well vs the competition, let's demonize Intel for charging the typical premium for the halo level which was inline with the pricing of the competition.
    Reply