Intel Launches New Xeon CPU, Announces Deep Learning Inference Accelerator

Intel provided a broad set of updates at the SC16 supercomputing conference. Intel continues to be the dominant CPU supplier for supercomputing applications, although both AMD and IBM still have a presence, albeit a declining one. Surprisingly, the biggest threat to Intel's dominance in the segment doesn't stem from the CPU competition; it comes from Nvidia's GPUs. Pascal promises to increase the pressure due to its enhanced mixed precision capabilities.

Datacenter and HPC applications are quickly adopting AI-centric architectures, and Intel has intensified its focus on its Xeon Phi Knight's Landing (KNL) and Knight's Mill (KNM) products as workloads become more GPU-friendly. Xeon Phi products provide the benefit of additional capabilities, such as bootability and integrated networking, which Intel hopes will help stave off the GPU competition. Intel announced a new CPU at the show and also brought forth its new FPGA-powered Deep Learning Inference Accelerator.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • mitch074
    Like the Northwood accelerated Internet?
    Reply
  • nutjob2
    They should have called it the BrainBurst architecture.

    Or maybe just admit it's a bunch of overpriced FPUs? Nah. Intel is desperate to stay relevant and most of their R&D budget is spent in their marketing department.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Speaking of Purley, Intel also has its Skylake-EP, which is the next-generation Xeon Purley platform, on display at the show. Intel has general availability slated for mid-2017.
    WHY IS THIS TAKING SO @#$!% LONG?!?

    The new chips boast support for AVX-512 instructions, which accelerate floating-point calculations and encryption algorithms.
    Note that Intel has partitioned AVX-512 instructions into different groups. Xeon Phi v2 is the first product to support AVX-512, but it doesn't support the entire set. The Purley-compatible Skylakes are actually slated to support a different subset. So, it's not strictly a generational division, unlike previous vector instruction set extensions.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVX-512#Instruction_set

    One of Intel's key developments is its 72-core Knights Landing (KNL) platform, which it claims offers 5x the performance and 8x the power efficiency of the competing GPU solutions.
    You shouldn't just repeat these specious claims without qualification. As these measurements were against Kepler-generation GPUs, they weren't really "competing GPU solutions".

    KNL is also bootable, which is a key value proposition.
    I think the bigger value proposition is that they can integrate with legacy codebases, without the sort of rewrite necessary to exploit CUDA. You can program them in any language, and run basically any existing software on them.

    But for people who prize FLOPS/$ or FLOPS/W above all else, GPUs (and FPGAs) are still where it's at. ...unless you can afford to make your own ASIC, like Google.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    18878271 said:

    One of Intel's key developments is its 72-core Knights Landing (KNL) platform, which it claims offers 5x the performance and 8x the power efficiency of the competing GPU solutions.
    You shouldn't just repeat these specious claims without qualification. As these measurements were against Kepler-generation GPUs, they weren't really "competing GPU solutions".

    KNL is also bootable, which is a key value proposition.
    I think the bigger value proposition is that they can integrate with legacy codebases, without the sort of rewrite necessary to exploit CUDA. You can program them in any language, and run basically any existing software on them.

    But for people who prize FLOPS/$ or FLOPS/W above all else, GPUs (and FPGAs) are still where it's at. ...unless you can afford to make your own ASIC, like Google.


    Yes, in the article I linked we specify that the claims aren't against newer GPU's (copy/pasted below) and we noted those are Intel's claims in this piece, but will add "previous-gen".

    It is notable that these results are from internal Intel testing, some of which the company generated with previous-generation GPUs. Intel indicated this is due to limited sample availability.


    GPU and FPGA are still king on a FLOPS/$ FLOPS/W perspective, but I'm curious of a comparison to a GPU if you also included the CPU in the equation, as it still requires one. The GPU would probably still win, but it would be interesting to see a more direct comparison.
    Reply