Judge Tosses Four Qualcomm Patent Suits Against Apple

(Image credit: photobyphm/Shutterstock)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • techy1966
    They are saying Qualcomm as being anti competitive yes they may or may not be but if this is true then how is it no one goes after Apple for doing this when they are known to be one of the worst offenders on the planet for having these types of practices. This is just my opinion on all of this.
    Reply
  • paulywauly121
    untouchable igods...
    Reply
  • spikey in tn
    ...engaged in exclusionary conduct...

    I agree totally with TECHY1966. Apple has engaged in exclusionary conduct pretty much ever since creation, in fact they are the "king of the hill" in that category. Why hasn't someone busted Apple too? Are they that successful in buying off judges?
    Reply
  • bigpinkdragon286
    The simple answer is the judge could very well be biased or prejudiced, rather than impartial. I can easily see a judge falling into the category of person that must have an iPhone no matter what, and I've met enough of those I wouldn't dismiss it as a possibility. I could just as easily see the judge being the opposite.

    Intel and Apple accusing other companies of anti-competitive practices? They should know, they seem to be expert there.
    Reply