Car Makers Haven’t Learned, Part 2: Same App Security Issues, 6 Months Hence

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • 3ogdy
    Left Column:
    _________
    OnStar (Opel / Vauxhall)
    Porsche Car Connect

    Right Column:
    Volvo On Call
    KiaMy BMW Remote

    Reply
  • falchard
    But the only car maker who moved to secure their vehicles infotainment system was FCA. All the rest pretty much swept it under the rug.
    Reply
  • Olle P
    What does the insurance companies say about this?
    It's no different to having doors that are extremely easy to pick without causing a scratch. I'd be very weary about buying one of these cars, and if I already owned one I'd remove the app ASAP.
    Reply
  • Sveg
    This is getting beyond ridiculous. There needs to be a new fine for a company bluntly ignoring a well known issue, and only addressing it when it becomes a national issue
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    My would the car companies want their car more secure than the competition ? When it's stolen, the owner gets reimbursed by insurance and promptly buys a new model.

    The loss is small to owner, and even the insurance company needs a certain level of losses to keep everyone making monthly payments. The incentives are just all pushing against making costly changes.
    Reply
  • Olle P
    20196654 said:
    ... When it's stolen, the owner gets reimbursed by insurance...
    That's just it. If the car gets stolen this way, or by the use of (illegal) duplicate keys, the insurance company cry "fraud" and give the owner nothing!

    Reply