Here Are Nvidia's Recommended Specs For 'PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds'

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • Mark RM
    Wow, what the heck is it using all that hardware for? Doesn't look all that great to me. Guess I'm the odd man out.
    Reply
  • Matt_550
    20486915 said:
    Wow, what the heck is it using all that hardware for? Doesn't look all that great to me. Guess I'm the odd man out.

    It's poorly optimized most likely.
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    That's really sad, that much GPU horsepower is need just for a game that doesn't look better than ARMA 3??

    That's some sad developer coding right there.
    Reply
  • Brian_R170
    Game developers are now letting the hardware manufacturers specify the recommended hardware... and nobody has a problem with that?
    Reply
  • Tanyac
    Well, for a game that can effectively warm a large house, I guess you want to spend a lot on a graphics card. We have 3 people here playing this game with temps in the high 70s low 80s (Celsius), with CPUs like 6700K and 16GB 3000 DDR4. Fans are running on high speeds and you can really feel the computers pumping out the heat.

    Poorly optimized indeed.
    Reply
  • notofthiswar
    I'm confused and here is why,
    Non test server:
    intel i7 7770k
    16gigs ram = avg 60 fps on hight- Ultra-54 fps lowest
    ssd
    Nvidia 970 4gb

    1080ti 8 gig = avg 90-120 fps


    Test server=

    970 = 80-88 fps

    1080ti = 144-160 fps


    This is based off a 1080p asus 144hz monitor 27 inch



    Friend with a 1060 with a intel 17 4790K and 8 gigs of ram gets 80-100 fps
    Reply
  • www.gasmushroom
    That game doesn't need GPU power, its just awful cpu optimisation until now. lets see what v1.0 brings.
    Reply
  • The Paladin
    I get with my 970 @1080 on Ultras, 80-110 5FPS on regular server and test server (which looks and feels like a different game engine) gets 90-125 FPS
    I run a OC to 4.7 4790k with 32GB ram and ssd.

    so I expect to get the same results in v1.0
    Reply
  • photonboy
    Brian_R710,
    I don't understand your concern that NVidia or AMD are recommending specs. They are simply running the game on their own hardware then figuring out what you need to hit say 60FPS/1080p/High settings.

    Their recommendations should be similar to anybody else who tests the game, though you can and should get more than one opinion if concerned.

    The game appears reasonably WELL OPTIMIZED so far on PC. Yes, it needs some CPU improvements but overall it's looking great.

    As for the GPU, a GTX1050Ti (has 4GB of VRAM) does a pretty good job of you properly tweak the settings.

    TANYAC,
    The temperature of a CPU or GPU alone doesn't tell you anything about how optimized a game is. I'm not saying it's well optimized or not, though I can tell you if the GPU is running HOT, and FPS is unlocked, then the code is actually using more of its processing capabilities than a game that is less hot, so in that sense it's actually MORE OPTIMIZED.

    So if a GPU runs relatively cool in one game vs another there's either:
    a) an FPS cap (i.e. VSYNC), or
    b) CPU bottleneck, or
    c) the game code isn't fully utilizing the GPU's resources
    Reply
  • The Paladin
    just for the record I use in steam launch option of the game the following command line. Open steam, goto librady, right click on PUBG, properties, set launch options and add this
    -maxMem=28000 -malloc=system -force-feature-level-11-0 -sm4

    I have 32Gb of ram , adjust the -maxmem=xxxx according to your ram.

    Reply