Eyes-on: AMD Shows 3D Capabilities With HD3D

42

Yesterday we visited AMD and showed you the new Eyefinity 5x1 setup running Dirt 3 and Dragon Age 2. Today we're going to tell you about what we saw from AMD's answer for the burgeoning 3D market.

Shooting through the glasses takes away the double vision.
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Marcus Yam served as Tom's Hardware News Director during 2008-2014. He entered tech media in the late 90s and fondly remembers the days when an overclocked Celeron 300A and Voodoo2 SLI comprised a gaming rig with the ultimate street cred.
  • dragonsqrrl
    "or a $200 3D Vision kit at most"

    An update on the price... Apparently the new kit comes with updated hardware as well, including longer battery life. Also a $50 price drop...

    http://guru3d.com/news/nvidia-3d-vision-kit-becomes-cheaper/
    Reply
  • foogoo
    The third d has very little effect on me.
    Reply
  • I have 50" Panasonic 3d TV, Onkyo Receiver 5.1 , HD5850, x6 Phenom @3.8ghz and 8GB ram running DDD drivers and following games work flawlessly, 24 fps per eye is plenty fast enough!

    1 LOTRO
    2 Grid
    3 NFS Carbon and Pro Street
    4 F1 2010
    5 FSX
    6 Crysis
    7 Prey
    8 Call of Juarez
    9 CIV IV
    10 GTA IV (Mind Blowing in 3d)
    11 Sins of a solar empire
    12 Hawx
    13 Company of Heroes
    14 Far Cry II
    15 Mass Effect
    16 Bioshock I andII
    17 CoD WoW

    To every person who mumbles 3d is a fad, keep on mumbling whilst I keep on gaming in full 3d!

    Also you can play any DVD in 3d as well as view your pictures in 3d, fantastic, best £3000 spent ever!
    Reply
  • Forgot to mention, only problem I have encountered is AA brings my 5850 to its knees in some titles running 3d 1920x1080, such as crysis and funnily enough LOTRO, I think 1GB VDDR just not enough in some titles for aa and 1080 3d! Time for that 6950 I guess!
    Reply
  • Transsive
    Sigh, 24 fps, hdmi fail.

    I'm hoping to try 120fps in 2D in the future. 60 fps in 3D would be interesting too I guess.
    Reply
  • Trialsking
    foogooThe third d has very little effect on me.Yeah can't wait for this fad to end. Or maybe it will be around like HDDVD's, oops...
    Reply
  • schmich
    moricon24 fps per eye is plenty fast enough!I'm sorry but 24fps is way too slow for fast games, for the rest sure.
    Reply
  • iam2thecrowe
    schmichI'm sorry but 24fps is way too slow for fast games, for the rest sure.you would probably have to use it for yourself to make your mind up on that. 24fps steady is not to bad since with vsync it will pretty much remain at 24fps, no more no less. but agreed that ATM its for spoilt rich kids and 3D enthusiasts, definitely not for most people. Also that 24fps cap is due to the hdmi interface so future improvements will be there when 3d become4s cheaper and more popular. I still havn't seen it for myself to pass judgement.
    Reply
  • Seikent
    TranssiveSigh, 24 fps, hdmi fail.I'm hoping to try 120fps in 2D in the future. 60 fps in 3D would be interesting too I guess.120 fps for 2D rocks with Vsync, it's pretty!
    Reply
  • ProDigit10
    if 1080p at 3d at 30fps is it's max, why not do 3D 1080i at 30fps?
    With a small redirection the 1080 vertical pixels can be remained, and the 1900 pixels horizontally can be divided in 2, 950pixels per eye.
    Reply