Ryzen 9 7945HX Games 10% Faster Than Core i9-13950HX, According to AMD Benchmarks

Ryzen 7045 Series
Ryzen 7045 Series (Image credit: AMD)

AMD has announced the availability of the company's latest Ryzen 7045 HX-series (Dragon Range) processors for performance gaming laptops. Holding nothing back, the chipmaker claims that the Ryzen 9 7945HX provides, on average, 10% higher gaming performance over Intel's Core i9-13950HX (Raptor Lake).

It's not the first time AMD has compared its 5nm Dragon Range chiplet processors to its Intel rivals. However, the previous comparison was questionable since the chipmaker used Intel's former 12th Generation Alder Lake chips as comparison points instead of the latest 13th Generation Raptor Lake parts. On this occasion, AMD pitches the Ryzen 9 7945HX against the Core i9-13950HX, so it's a fair fight. 

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Elusive Ruse
    Notebookcheck ran a few benchmarks on the new Asus Zephyrus equipped with the 7945HX.
    SuIIFE5LF_0View: https://youtu.be/SuIIFE5LF_0
    Reply
  • Actually some Dragon Range laptops are listed/available at the moment, but some of the links given below are not working, and models are showing out of stock. But most of the models are indeed expensive.
    Source: WCCFTECH: ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (7945HX + 4090 + 32GB + 4 TB) - $5145 US (Amazon)ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (7945HX + 4090 + 64GB + 2 TB) - $4799 US (Amazon)ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (7945HX + 4090 + 32GB + 2 TB) - $4499 US (Amazon)ASUS ROG STRIX SCAR 17 (7945HX + 4080 + 32GB + 1 TB) - $3499 US (Amazon)ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (7945HX + 4090 + 64GB + 2 TB) - $4779 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (7945HX + 4090 + 32GB + 2 TB) - $4667 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (7945HX + 4080 + 32GB + 1 TB) - $3499 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG STRIX SCAR 17 (7945HX + 4090 + 32GB + 1 TB) - $3499 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG STRIX SCAR 17 (7945HX + 4080 + 32GB + 1 TB) - $2899 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG STRIX G17 (7945HX + 4070 + 16GB + 1TB) - $2999 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG STRIX G17 (7945HX + 4070 + 16GB + 1 TB) - $2199 US (Newegg)ASUS ROG STRIX G17 (7945HX + 4060 + 16GB + 1 TB) - $1799 US (Newegg)
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    I kind of want to see what that note under the graph says, LOL.

    Marketing is evil, never forget that. Those foot notes are very important.

    That being said, and the initial reviews I've managed to read, all point to good things around the Zen4-based mobile SKUs.

    Regards :D
    Reply
  • SiliconFly
    Another fake review from AMD. Instead of comparing it with the fastest 13980HX, they've compared it with the slower 13950HX . :joycat:
    Reply
  • HoveringAbove
    An extra 100MHz will not make much of a difference.
    Reply
  • SiliconFly
    HoveringAbove said:
    An extra 100MHz will not make much of a difference.

    It does. Instead of the performance difference being 10%, the actual difference will be somewhere around 6% only. Thats a huge difference.
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    SiliconFly said:
    It does. Instead of the performance difference being 10%, the actual difference will be somewhere around 6% only. Thats a huge difference.
    how do you extrapolate a 4% performance improvement from a 1.8% clock speed difference between the 13950hx to the 13980hx?
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    btmedic04 said:
    how do you extrapolate a 4% performance improvement from a 1.8% clock speed difference between the 13950hx to the 13980hx?
    It's called: "optimistic math" :D

    Regards XD
    Reply
  • SiliconFly
    btmedic04 said:
    how do you extrapolate a 4% performance improvement from a 1.8% clock speed difference between the 13950hx to the 13980hx?

    Then why not compare it with Intel's best instead of comparing it with something slower? Typical AMD.

    For starters, the 13980HX is faster than 13950HX by almost 7.5% in some benchmarks.

    Comparing Ryzen 9 7945HX with the slower Core i9-13950HX is pretty much stupid. It should be compared with the faster Core i9-13980HX. Then the performance delta will be only around 6%
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    SiliconFly said:
    Another fake review from AMD. Instead of comparing it with the fastest 13980HX, they've compared it with the slower 13950HX . :joycat:
    I found some benchmarks by a 3rd party:
    Reply