Seagate this week said that it began shipments of its 30+ terabyte hard drives based on its heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology to one of its cloud datacenters clients. The drives are final qualification samples, but the company is on track to recognize revenue from sales of its HAMR-based Corvault systems in the coming weeks.
"We are tracking well to our stated plans and achieved the key milestone last week of shipping initial qualification units to a cloud launch partner, and we expect to recognize initial revenue from 30TB+ platforms this quarter as part of our Corvault system solutions," said Dave Mosley, chief executive of Seagate, at the earnings call with analysts and investors earlier this week (via SeekingAlpha).
Recognizing revenue means that actual hardware — Corvault storage systems based on 30TB+ HAMR HDDs — has already been tested by Seagate, purchased, shipped, and is now being qualified by (a) Seagate customer(s). As soon as qualification is finished, Seagate will recognize the money it received as revenue.
Seagate has placed high hopes on HAMR technology and has sent HAMR-based hard disk drives to specific customers for evaluation for many years. During its recent earnings call, the company announced that it plans to release its 2nd generation HAMR platform in mainstream hard drives in Q3.
Seagate has not provided much information about its original HAMR platform, such as the number of platters it can accommodate. Nevertheless, with storage capabilities of over 30TB, the company will offer customers an unprecedented storage density for 3.5-inch HDDs. While the company acknowledges that the proportion of HAMR-based hard drives will not be significant this year, it will likely increase as HAMR media and HAMR heads become more efficient.
Initially, Seagate intends to use HAMR disks and heads to create ultra-premium, high-capacity nearline drives for hyperscale cloud datacenters. However, over time, this new media and heads will be incorporated into mid-range and even entry-level high-capacity HDDs to reduce manufacturing costs and increase the company's profitability.
Meanwhile, Seagate does not provide any guidance regarding how fast its nearline and other drives will transit to HAMR, though 2024 is when the company is set to ramp up its production.
"I do not know that we can really break it out based on HAMR transition right now because there's so many other dynamics," added Mosley. "But we are aggressively filling the pipeline full of the product, working on the yields and scrap that we need to get down. "
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
Exciting stuff. I've been waiting for this major hard drive capacity jump for a long while.Reply
Hopefully other hard drive brands are not far behind. It's a little concerning that WD has been silent about increasing hard drive capacity lately.
There is still the question of whether or not these new drives will even be available to consumers. If they will be available, I have a feeling they are going to be prohibitively expensive. On the other hand, they may not be too expensive if hard drive manufacturers start using HAMR for all their HDD product lines. Economy of scale.
"has already been tested by Seagate, purchased, shipped, and is now being qualified by (a) Seagate customer(s). As soon as qualification is finished, Seagate will recognize the money it received as revenue. "Reply
So whose doing the actual testing? Seagate or the customers?
Both. Customers will not rely on Seagates' testing alone though and have their own evaluation.peachpuff said:So whose doing the actual testing? Seagate or the customers?
This is standard practice. You don't just take a vendor's testing at face value. You have to test the system to make sure it meets your requirements which might differ quite a bit from Seagate's. It's just like the mobo QVL list for RAM. It got tested by the vendor i.e G-Skill, Crucial, Corsair. But the motherboard maker also tries it on their specific board before stating that it works.peachpuff said:"has already been tested by Seagate, purchased, shipped, and is now being qualified by (a) Seagate customer(s). As soon as qualification is finished, Seagate will recognize the money it received as revenue. "
So whose doing the actual testing? Seagate or the customers?
While it is always great to see a major leap in HDD capacity; I sincerely doubt that we will see a significant speed improvement with these drives. Other than the natural speedup you get from an increase in areal density (i.e. each rotation of a single track contains more data blocks); about the only major improvement we have seen in the past decade is with the new dual-actuator models.Reply
Every time capacity increases 20, 30, or 50%; we see a speed increase of 3, 4, or 5%. This results in ever increasing time needed to read and/or write all the data on a full drive. A full backup, a RAID rebuild, or some kind of major FS maintenance (e.g. defragging) can now take days instead of just hours.
It’s a data drive. it doesn’t need to get the fragmented ever. Nobody is going to use this as an operating system drive that needs defragmentation.Reply
Nobody needs raid either for any reason with sizes like that. Plus software raid sucks and it’s worse now than it’s ever been before.
idk why they dont lower the price of hdd while ppl buy more ssd. ssd is now the same price with hdd.Reply
I wonder if this is mechanically possible: double the height of the 3.5" disks (would still fit in many consumer systems), possibly would allow increasing the number of platters and heads. More space, more speed at relatively no extra cost, no exotic new technology needed. But data center being the main market, one should not dream. Finally, I'm sure they already thought about it and concluded it would not help the bottom line.Reply