Silicon Motion's PCIe 5.0 SSD Controller is Reportedly Faster and Draws 30% Less Power Than Phison's E26

Silicon Motion SM2508
(Image credit: Silicon Motion)

It's no secret that Silicon Motion is preparing its SM2508 PCIe 5.0 SSD controller to power the best SSDs. The company shared more information on SM2508 at the Memory Trend Seminar 2023 event in Shenzhen, China.

A previous roadmap showed that the SM2508 would be made on a 12nm manufacturing process. Silicon Motion has officially confirmed that the upcoming PCIe 5.0 SSD controller leverages the TSMC's 6nm EUV manufacturing process. The SM2508 is on a more advanced process node than the competition, such as the PS5026-E26 and the Innogrit IG5666 PCIe 5.0 SSD controllers on the 12nm process node. The 6nm process node offers a 45% power reduction compared to the 12nm process node, and up to 20% less logic cell area than the 7nm process node.

TOPICS
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Order 66
    Pretty soon, water cooling our SSDs will be a necessity if we don't get more efficient controllers like this one.
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    Order 66 said:
    Pretty soon, water cooling our SSDs will be a necessity if we don't get more efficient controllers like this one.
    As this is 30% more efficient than the other PCIE gen 5 controller on the market, this actually means we will see much better power/performance.

    Also highest power draw is only 15W. a passive heat sink is more than sufficient, WC is Overkill
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    "30% less" can be misleading.

    30% less than 50 watts is significant.
    30% less than 5 watts (as seems to be the case here)....not so much.

    5W -> 3.5W does not really matter to your PSU or cooling situation.
    Reply
  • williamcll
    USAFRet said:
    "30% less" can be misleading.

    30% less than 50 watts is significant.
    30% less than 5 watts (as seems to be the case here)....not so much.

    5W -> 3.5W does not really matter to your PSU or cooling situation.
    Pretty important for laptops when every watt matters.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    USAFRet said:
    "30% less" can be misleading.

    30% less than 50 watts is significant.
    30% less than 5 watts (as seems to be the case here)....not so much.

    5W -> 3.5W does not really matter to your PSU or cooling situation.
    In an era when fast PCIe 5.0 SSDs need bulky heatsinks and active cooling to avoid throtting, 30% is definitely significant. Even if it's a max of 1.5W savings, that's still significant even for a drive using 10 W. It could mean the difference between throttling or not. It could mean using a cheaper, passive heatsink (or an even smaller active one).

    Heat also shortens the life of NAND. So, there's that benefit, as well.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Yeah, I get that.
    Its just that 30% sounds soooo dramatic.
    Reply
  • dolfinator
    Those BSOD-colored slides tho...
    Reply
  • Order 66
    cyrusfox said:
    As this is 30% more efficient than the other PCIE gen 5 controller on the market, this actually means we will see much better power/performance.

    Also highest power draw is only 15W. a passive heat sink is more than sufficient, WC is Overkill
    That is true right now, but if future (PCIE gen 6+) drives get faster (which they will) they will probably require more power until a more efficient controller comes out for those drives, meaning that WC may be necessary in the future. My point is that the trend has been somewhat worrying, we went from not needing any cooling (or very little) for PCIe 3 and 4 drives to now needing active cooling for some PCIe 5 drives.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Order 66 said:
    That is true right now, but if future (PCIE gen 6+) drives get faster (which they will) they will probably require more power until a more efficient controller comes out for those drives,
    I don't foresee PCIe 6.0 coming to consumer platforms any time soon. Although it doesn't increase the clock frequency, it does require a higher signal-to-noise ratio, which increases board costs.

    IMO, we're likely to see CXL first. If & when that happens, maybe client devices will eventually get PCIe 6.0 / CXL 3.0, which share the same PHY standard. That's a long ways off - I think the next generation of server CPUs don't even have those technologies, yet.

    Order 66 said:
    My point is that the trend has been somewhat worrying, we went from not needing any cooling (or very little) for PCIe 3 and 4 drives to now needing active cooling for some PCIe 5 drives.
    Yes, it's not a good trend. However, SSD performance has been increasing a lot faster than power consumption. If there's a pause on performance improvements, then efficiency can (mostly) catch up.
    Reply
  • Order 66
    bit_user said:
    If there's a pause on performance improvements, then efficiency can (mostly) catch up.
    The PC industry is (generally) obsessed with things going faster, I highly doubt (at least for now) that SSD manufactures would pause on gen 5 performance since they haven't been on the market for even 6 months yet.
    Reply