Snapdragon X Elite Outperforms Intel, AMD, Apple CPUs (In Vendor Benchmarks)

Snapdragon X Elite
Snapdragon X Elite (Image credit: Qualcomm)

Qualcomm recently announced the Snapdragon X Elite, a new 4nm processor that brings the company's latest Arm-based Oryon cores to laptops. Qualcomm also held a private event with members of the press and analysts to offer a preview of the Snapdragon X Elite's power and how it stacks up against current chips from Intel, AMD, and Apple.

For the demonstration, Qualcomm prepared two Snapdragon X Elite reference designs. The contrasting configurations reflect the kind of systems consumers can expect to find the Snapdragon X Elite in when the devices hit the retail market in the middle of 2024. Configuration A possesses the specifications you can expect from a high-performance laptop; meanwhile, configuration B is in the realm of thin-and-lights.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • kaalus
    Why did they not compare against M2 Pro, which has similar TDP to Snapdragon? The vanilla M2 they tested against has half of the performance cores and half of the GPU cores of M2 Pro, so you can pretty much double Apple scores in all categories in the table. Suddenly, Snapdragon does not look so good.

    And M2 is over a year old. In fact, M3 is likely coming out later today during the Apple event.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Hey, where are the graphs?

    From Anandtech:




    Source: https://www.anandtech.com/show/21112/qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-performance-preview-a-first-look-at-whats-to-come
    The Anandtech article has more, including iGPU performance.

    Since the Snapdragon X Elite is made on TSMC N4, the comparison vs. Ryzen 9 7940HS is on the same node. The M2 is at a slight disadvantage, being made on TSMC N5. The M3 will use TSMC N3 (or N3E), which should make that matchup a lot more interesting.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    kaalus said:
    Why did they not compare against M2 Pro, which has similar TDP to Snapdragon?
    The cynical interpretation would be that they wanted to make themselves look better. However, their decision would be defensible if they're planning on pricing closer to the M2 than M2 Pro (which I doubt - this is Qualcomm, after all).
    Reply
  • suryasans
    bit_user said:
    Hey, where are the graphs?

    From Anandtech:
    Source: https://www.anandtech.com/show/21112/qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-performance-preview-a-first-look-at-whats-to-come
    The Anandtech article has more, including iGPU performance.

    Since the Snapdragon X Elite is made on TSMC N4, the comparison vs. Ryzen 9 7940HS is on the same node. The M2 is at a slight disadvantage, being made on TSMC N5. The M3 will use TSMC N3 (or N3E), which should make that matchup a lot more interesting.
    This article is just a resume from Anandtech's article which is the first hand.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    suryasans said:
    This article is just a resume from Anandtech's article which is the first hand.
    Anandtech didn't make the graphs, though. Those are slides from Qualcomm. No reason not to include them here.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    kaalus said:
    Why did they not compare against M2 Pro, which has similar TDP to Snapdragon? The vanilla M2 they tested against has half of the performance cores and half of the GPU cores of M2 Pro, so you can pretty much double Apple scores in all categories in the table. Suddenly, Snapdragon does not look so good.

    And M2 is over a year old. In fact, M3 is likely coming out later today during the Apple event.
    The Config B setup is basically identical to an M2 Max performance wise. 2780 SC (SXE) vs 2736 SC (M2 Max) and 14000 MC (SXE) vs 14493 MC (M2 Max).

    The M2 Max manufactured on the N5P while the Snapdragon X Elite is on the N4. The N4 node is an enhanced 5 NM node so there isn't much difference there. I'm not surprised the numbers basically line up with an M2 Max (I guess I am a little because I don't believe the Snapdragon X Elite has the memory on package, but it does have 2 extra cores) .

    Remember Apple has exclusivity rights to the TSMC's 3NM node until the end of the year ish (don't remember the exact date 3NM opens for other customers).
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    That's all well and good, but the real question is how (and IF) it will perform with x86, being an ARM chip. Part of Apple's success with the M silicon is it has blanket support and the performance loss for x86 translation is minimal. If Snapdragon X Elite either doesn't work with x86 or has a decent performance hit, then it's not going to matter to anyone who doesn't use programs which have an ARM variant.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Talk is cheap, I'll wait until independent reviews come out.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Have any motherboards been announced?

    A chip by itself is not usable.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    JamesJones44 said:
    The M2 Max manufactured on the N5P while the Snapdragon X Elite is on the N4. The N4 node is an enhanced 5 NM node so there isn't much difference there.
    TSMC N4 is supposed to have 6% higher density and approximately 4% better performance (at the same power), than N5.
    Source: https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/6439/tsmc-extends-its-5nm-family-with-a-new-enhanced-performance-n4p-node/
    There's also N4P, which ups the performance advantage to 11%.

    JamesJones44 said:
    I'm not surprised the numbers basically line up with an M2 Max (I guess I am a little because I don't believe the Snapdragon X Elite has the memory on package, but it does have 2 extra cores) .
    I'm not sure if they've said how it's connected, but they did say they're using LPDDR5X-8533, which I'm not sure you can do off-package. That's certainly faster than the LPDDR5-6400 the M2 uses. That's enough to net them 136 GB/s of bandwidth, at only 128-bit. It seems the main benefit of putting it on-package is really power savings, which you can turn around and spend on frequency, if you want the additional performance.

    Unlike desktop PCs, phones have long been able to adjust their memory frequency on-demand. I'm sure their new laptop SoC is doing this with memory, as well. So, even though it might burn a lot of power at 8533 MT/s, it's only running that fast when under heavy load. The rest of the time, they can scale back and enjoy some power savings.

    JamesJones44 said:
    Remember Apple has exclusivity rights to the TSMC's 3NM node until the end of the year ish (don't remember the exact date 3NM opens for other customers).
    That's irrelevant now, because Qualcomm said devices wouldn't be shipping until mid 2024. However, it probably factored into their decision to use N4, since I'm sure they expected to have it in shipping devices this year.
    Reply