TSMC Readies N2P and N2X: 2nm with Enhanced Performance

TSMC
(Image credit: TSMC)

At the 2023 North American Technology Symposium TSMC revealed more information about its upcoming 2nm-class process technologies set to be production ready in 2025 – 2026. The world's largest foundry plans to expand its N2 family with N2P that will get a backside power rail and promises to boost performance, reduce power consumption, and increase transistor density. In addition, TSMC plans N2X, a node designed to deliver maximum performance and support for higher voltages.

(Image credit: TSMC)

N2 Provides Full Node Advantages

TSMC's original N2 process technology, set to enter high volume production sometime in 2025, introduces gate-all-around (GAA) Nanosheet transistors. When compared to N3E, the new node promises to boost performance by 10% to 15% with an identical power and transistor count, or decrease power consumption by 25% to 30% while maintaining the same frequency and complexity. When it comes to scaling, TSMC refrains of providing detailed numbers, but says that the new fabrication technology will enable an increase of chip density by 15%, which is an ambiguous term as it reflects a hypothetical IC containing 50% logic, 30% SRAM, and 20% analog circuits. 

(Image credit: TSMC)

TSMC's N2 progress looks to be as planned. At its symposium, TSMC announced that its Nanosheet GAA transistor performance had reached over 80% of its target specifications and that the average yield of a 256Mb SRAM test IC exceeds 50%.

N2P: Backside Power Rail for Higher Performance Efficiency

While N2 provides tangible advantages over N3E, its successor N2P promises to be even more impressive. TSMC's second generation 2nm-class process is set to incorporate backside power delivery network (PDN) that is designed to increase transistor performance, lower power consumption, increase transistor density, and eliminate risks of interference between data and power wires in the chip.  

Backside power delivery is one of the most important innovations in the recent years as back-end-of-line (BEOL) and contact resistances have been chipmakers' major challenges for a while. By relocating power rails to the back of the wafer, backside power delivery separates I/O and power wiring and mitigates elevated via resistance issues in the BEOL.  

(Image credit: TSMC)

Though TSMC has not provided specific figures regarding N2P's performance, power, and area (PPA) benefits over N2, some analysts say that backside PDN could lead to a single-digit power consumption decline and double-digit transistor density increase. Keeping in mind that TSMC will likely make further optimizations to N2P, expect this technology to be significantly more advanced than N2 and N3 both in terms of performance efficiency and in transistor density. 

TSMC expects N2P to be ready for high volume manufacturing (HVM) in 2026, so expect actual chips made on this node to ship in 2027. Assuming that Intel fulfils its promise and ships the first chips made on its 20A production technologies (which employs both RibbonFET GAA transistors and PowerVia backside PDN) in 2024, it will be two or three years ahead of TSMC with backside power rail. 

N2X: High Voltages for Extreme Performance

TSMC is developing N2X, a fabrication process tailored for high-performance computing (HPC) applications such as high-end datacenter CPUs. In general, these chips are power hungry and need the ability to increase their clocks at peak demands. This means that they have to support high voltages and currents. Since the node is set to be available in 2026 at the earliest, TSMC does not outline its performance enhancements over N2, N2P, and N3X just now. Meanwhile, as with all recent production technologies, maximum performance and efficiency can only be achieved through extensive design technology co-optimization (DTCO) between foundry and IP developers. 

Anton Shilov
Freelance News Writer

Anton Shilov is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • TerryLaze
    Admin said:
    increased voltages.
    Too soon Tom's, too soon!
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    TSVs must have gotten really cheap if TSMC can now afford to feed transistors from the backside.

    The signal side of things is still going to require some ground and power planes to carry high-speed return currents and provide whatever rails aren't being shoved up the backside.

    Imagine if the IHS actually became active DC ground carrying about half of peak load. All of the ground rail vias going through the die to the IHS should reduce the silicon slab's net thermal resistance too.
    Reply
  • kjfatl
    I know nothing about semiconductor processing but:
    There are no planes in an IC unless these are planes added above the signal metallization layers. Everything is powered by rails. Instead of supplying these rails powered from the power ring around the periphery of the IC, these rails are fed through vias to the back side of the IC. This would require thousands or millions, not billions of connections through the IC. To put things in perspective many cameras use back side imaging where there is one via or via set per pixel going through the die allowing for millions of connections.

    To get this to work, the die must be made very thin. This thinness will help quiet a bit with heat transfer.
    This process will be far from free.
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    We already thin wafers through a backside grind process. If you imagine the edge of a wafer, and then zoom in so that the thin edge of the wafer is 10 feet tall, we only use the top two inches of the wafer. The rest of the wafer's thickness is there for structural stability during fabrication.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    kjfatl said:
    many cameras use back side imaging where there is one via or via set per pixel going through the die allowing for millions of connections.
    Is this using a CCD image sensor? If so, you only need a set of connections for each block (usually row) of pixels that are coupled.
    Reply
  • kjfatl
    No, these are Back Side Illuminated CMOS image sensors.
    Reply