Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler Review: A stylish debut, effective debut

The Iota A62 sports a sleek aesthetic and a dot-matrix display for temperature monitoring, paired with low noise levels in common workloads

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

CPU-only thermal results without power limits

Without power limits enforced on Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K and i7-14700K CPUs, the CPU will hit its peak temperature (TJ Max) and thermally throttle with even the strongest of air coolers. Because the CPU reaches its peak temperature with air coolers like the one we’re looking at with this review, I’ve measured the CPU package power to determine the maximum wattage cooled to best compare their performance – so you won’t see results in this graph comparing it to the strongest liquid coolers on the market.

It’s important to note that thermal performance can scale differently depending on the CPU it’s being tested with.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Looking at the results here with Intel’s “Raptor Lake” Core i7-14700K, the average watts cooled was 241. This is roughly what I would expect from a modern dual-tower air cooler. This is a level better than Noctua’s original NH-D15 (now known as the G1), and just a hair behind ID-Cooling’s Frozn A620

It is important to remember that CPU coolers can scale (and perform) differently depending on the CPU it is paired with due to differences in manufacturing processes and the location of hotspots on the CPU – and it seems that this cooler performs slightly worse with Arrow Lake.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Looking at the results with Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K, there’s a larger gap between the Iota A62 WH and ID-Cooling’s Frozn A620. That said, it cooled 285 watts during the course of testing and still managed to outperform Thermalright’s Hyper Vision 360 AIO!

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

When it comes to maximum noise levels, the Iota A62 WH was moderate, only reaching 44.2 dBA – and as you’ll see in our other benchmarks, it runs much quieter in common workloads.

CPU-only thermal results with noise normalized to 38.9 dBA

Finding the right balance between fan noise levels and cooling performance is important. While running fans at full speed can improve cooling capacity to some extent, the benefits are limited and many users prefer a quieter system.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

For this test, I’ve set the noise levels of the air cooler to reach 38.9 dBA. Ocypus’ A62 cooler performed well enough in this scenario, cooling 234W – essentially on par with the best result I’ve recorded thus far on this system with FSP’s closest competitor, the MP7.

253W results

My recent reviews have focused more on tests with both the CPU and GPU being stressed, but many of y’all have indicated that you would like to see more CPU-only tests. In response, I’ve started testing Intel’s “Arrow Lake” Core Ultra 9 285K with a 253W limit.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The results here are reasonably good. Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin delivered the best results for an air cooler, but the Iota A62 is only behind that by 2 degrees C, while slightly outperforming FSP’s MP7.

135W CPU + 290W GPU results

Testing a CPU Cooler in isolation is great for synthetic benchmarks, but doesn’t tell the whole story of how it will perform. I’ve incorporated two tests with a power limit imposed on the CPU, while also running a full load on MSI’s GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G VENTUS 3X.

The CPU power limit of 135W was chosen based on the worst CPU power consumption I observed in gaming with Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K, which was in Rise of the Tomb Raider.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Thermal performance is good in this scenario, on par with Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin in terms of CPU temperature. Iota’s A62 WH manages this while running quieter than the Peerless Assassin, and only reaches 38.9 dBA in this test!

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

85W CPU + 290W GPU results

Our second round of CPU + GPU testing is also performed with Arrow Lake. The power limit of 85W was chosen based on typical power consumption in gaming scenarios using the Core Ultra 9 285K CPU. This should be fairly easy for most coolers, the main point of this test is to see how quietly (or noisily) a cooler runs in low-intensity scenarios.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

With a CPU temperature of 56 degrees C, Ocypus’ Iota A62 WH performs in line with other air coolers like ID-Cooling’s Frozn A620 and Thermalright’s Peerless Assassin 140. It does this while reaching only 37.3 dBA, which is a nicely low volume level.

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Conclusion

Ocypus Iota A62 Digital CPU Cooler

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Ocypus makes a splash into the cooling market with its Iota A62 WH, which features low noise levers in common workloads, good temperatures, attractive looks, and a unique dot matrix for displaying CPU or GPU temperatures. This version of the cooler runs for $65 USD, but if you don’t need the display other variants can be found for a much cheaper $39 USD.

Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • Heat_Fan89
    The white version is now $33. Too bad I went with the Thermal Prism 360 AIO. Cause the black A62 with temp readout would have looked pretty slick in my all black NZXT H7 Flow build.
    Reply
  • PurpleSquid
    Heat_Fan89 said:
    The white version is now $33. Too bad I went with the Thermal Prism 360 AIO. Cause the black A62 with temp readout would have looked pretty slick in my all black NZXT H7 Flow build.
    I feel you, I went with a deepcool lt720 right before it got banned.
    Reply
  • PixelAkami
    Welp, guess this is the cooler im getting for my 9600K
    Reply
  • soniccd
    somehow looks like a deepcool cooler
    Reply
  • ezst036
    I think the temperature display would also be highly useful if used for a fanless setup with a low TDP processor.
    Reply
  • Chikensoops
    The fan used seems to be an Ocypus Delta F12. Theres a 3 pack on amazon for $18.99
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    soniccd said:
    somehow looks like a deepcool cooler
    You're not the only one who has had that thought. My editor commented the same. While I can see how it would remind you of it, the fin design is a bit different than anything DeepCool ever made.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    ezst036 said:
    I think the temperature display would also be highly useful if used for a fanless setup with a low TDP processor.
    If you're going fanless, wouldn't you expect it to hit TJMax under load?
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Albert.Thomas said:
    If you're going fanless, wouldn't you expect it to hit TJMax under load?
    I would not have that expectation. Intel makes a 285T(35W) and AMD has the Pro8700GE(35W), either of which would make a good pairing.

    Unless of course I failed to understand that this cooler is not as large as it appears. Separately, going fanless does force a small handful of considerations, such as the design of the computer case.
    Reply