Intel's new Special Edition gaming CPU hits 6.2 GHz with 1.5 volts — upcoming Core i9-14900KS packaging and per-core frequencies revealed

Intel's Core i9-14900KS CPU leaked.
(Image credit: pakhtunov)

Images of Intel's upcoming Core i9-14900KS have leaked, including photos of the CPU's retail packaging, and the technical specs revealed in a motherboard BIOS (via @I_Leak_VN on X). The new flagship CPU will seemingly have the same box Intel used for the Core i9-13900K and Core i9-14900K, which features a wafer-shaped plastic case. Additionally, BIOS screenshots indicate that the 14900KS can hit 6.2 GHz on three of its P-cores out-of-the-box, though this will take a shocking 1.5 volts to achieve.

The images come courtesy of Asus forum user Pakhtunov, who apparently has access to a Core i9-14900KS before its official launch later this month. The user took a picture of two 14900KS boxes, and although it's hard to see entirely, it appears that the 14900KS will use the same packaging the 14900K did, including the novelty wafer that houses the CPU itself

(Image credit: pakhtunov)

Pakhtunov also included screenshots of the BIOS, which tell us exactly what the 14900KS's clock speed behavior is. The CPU is apparently capable of hitting 6.2 GHz on three P-cores and 5.9 GHz on all eight P-cores, which is just 100 MHz below the regular Core i9-14900K's boost clock of 6.0 GHz. However, it's not clear if all three cores will operate at 6.2 GHz at the same time, since Intel usually has a dual-core boost, not a tri-core boost. Meanwhile, three E-cores are rated for 4.6 GHz, and all can hit 4.5 GHz; a 200MHz higher boost clock compared to the 14900K.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Core i9-14900KS Boost Clocks
Row 0 - Cell 0 Core i9-14900KSCore i9-14900K
P-core Maximum Boost6.2 GHz6.0 GHz
P-core All-Core Boost5.9 GHz5.6 GHz
E-core Maximum Boost4.6 GHz4.4 GHz
E-core All-Core Boost4.5 GHz4.3 GHz

To reliably get such high clock speeds, Intel has presumably binned a ton of top-end Raptor Lake Refresh chips, but it seems like the Core i9-14900KS also has some very high default voltages. To hit its 6.2 GHz boost clock, the screenshots indicate that 1.498 volts will be necessary, which is a very high amount of voltage for modern CPUs. However, 5.9 GHz will only require 1.413 volts, which is still high but a more reasonable amount of voltage.

This also indicates the Core i9-14900KS will be as bad as the 14900K when it comes to power consumption. It might even draw 410 watts according to one rumor, which also indicated a 6.2 GHz boost clock (on two instead of three cores) and an all-core 5.9 GHz boost frequency. Not only will this require a large power supply, but it will also require some incredible cooling.

Given these leaks, it's pretty clear the Core i9-14900KS is launching soon, and according to rumors it should hit store shelves in mid-March. Regardless of the actual release date, it's clear that the CPU is arriving soon, and it probably won't be cheap if previous Special Edition models are any indication.

Matthew Connatser

Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Sounds better than AMD's "Peak boost on one core under bursty lightly threaded workload" BS they use to justify their misleading boost speeds.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    Talk about a chip that is equivalent to using a lifted dually truck with massive tires that gets 4 gallons per mile just to get your morning Starbucks. 410 watts is simply ridiculous. About the only thing that will cool that properly is phase change cooling.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Last time I see 1.5V on a cpu year 2000. Now we Have again... Maybe need a DIY Microwave Transformer to put Power on that cpu!
    Reply
  • rluker5
    I imagine this chip will have no problem holding those clocks with a $30 air cooler - when it isn't doing an intensive all core load like cinebench. That's when it will get thirsty.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    rluker5 said:
    I imagine this chip will have no problem holding those clocks with a $30 air cooler - when it isn't doing an intensive all core load like cinebench. That's when it will get thirsty.
    I’m sure you’ll have no problem running this cpu without any cooler at all when all but 1 core is disabled and the clock is limited to 4.17 MHz. But then, why are you buying an overpriced piece of sand and purposefully throwing away the performance you are paying dearly for.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    Amdlova said:
    Last time I see 1.5V on a cpu year 2000. Now we Have again... Maybe need a DIY Microwave Transformer to put Power on that cpu!
    Now we just need Intel to come out with a KS Ultra version that pushes 6.25 GHz at 2.3V lol
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    I’m sure you’ll have no problem running this cpu without any cooler at all when all but 1 core is disabled and the clock is limited to 4.17 MHz. But then, why are you buying an overpriced piece of sand and purposefully throwing away the performance you are paying dearly for.
    The AG 400 is below $30 and can cool for 246W which means that you will get full performance out of an 13-14900k ,for the KS part we will have to wait and see, but if previous ks cpus are any indication then it will also run full speed at ~250W
    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amazon-basics-cpu-cooler-review/2
    Reply