Intel Core i9-14900KS tipped for mid-March release – touted timeframe wouldn’t be a surprise

Alleged Intel Core i9-14900KS
(Image credit: HXL / QQ)

Intel’s most powerful 14th Generation Core processor will launch in about a month, according to Benchlife’s sources. It wouldn’t surprise us if the rumored Core i9-14900KS special edition Intel chip comes out within the suggested timeframe, simply because it is due. Intel’s pinnacle of Raptor Lake Refresh engineering is expected to hit a single- and dual-core 6.2 GHz turbo clock and chew through up to 410W.

“According to our reliable sources, Intel plans to launch the Intel Core i9 in mid-March 2024," Benchlife writes. The chip is a pretty sure bet that to be the world’s fastest gaming CPU. The latest that a Core i9 KS CPU has launched in recent history was at the beginning of April.

Intel hasn’t officially confirmed that it will release a Core i9 KS special edition to underline the current desktop generation. However, the increasing weight of leaks makes it look like it will be launched in the not-too-distant future.

We assume that Intel has been giving the ‘standard’ Core i9-14900K plenty of time to sell to its full market potential, and to build up a decent stock of cherry-picked chips that are capable enough to make it into the ‘special edition.’ From what we know the Intel Core i9-14900KS will have a 200 MHz higher max turbo frequency out of the box, but it seems to achieve this frequency gain with a large impact on efficiency. Check out our handy comparison chart featuring the established Intel Core i9-14900K and rumored 14900KS to see the expected key differences.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Intel Core i9-14900KS specifications are unconfirmed

Intel

Core i9-14900K

Core i9-14900KS

Architecture

Raptor Lake Refresh

Raptor Lake Refresh

Cores / Threads

24 (8P + 16E) / 32

24 (8P + 16E) / 32

Base Clock (GHz)

3.2

3.2

Turbo Clocks (GHz)

6.0 (1T), 5.6 (multi)

6.2 (1T, 2T), X.X (multi)

Caches (MB)

32 (L2), 36 (L3)

32 (L2), 36 (L3)

Max Turbo Power (W)

253

410

While the new 6.2 GHz turbo clock looks likely to be the headlining quality of the Core i9-14900KS, the MTP figure of 410W in the chart above is just a data point taken from the recent leaks. In our review of the Core i9-14900K, we actually saw this processor with an official MTP of 253W hitting a peak of 385W, but its average during the benchmarks was 339W.

When the Core i9-14900KS does arrive, it is going to be fascinating to see how Intel frames the product, and what kind of cooling system potential customers are going to have to equip to see its full potential.

Mark Tyson
Freelance News Writer

Mark Tyson is a Freelance News Writer at Tom's Hardware US. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    Fascinating! I would have said more of a yawn fest!! I mean, these CPU's are ridiculous. 70w extra for 200mhz!? MEH
    Reply
  • punkncat
    ^Talk about a space heater!
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Codename: Northwood
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    There are some people who haunt this place who will try and justify products like this until they're blue not only in the face but also in other extremities too.

    But this doesn't change the fact that the darn thing is just stupid. Sure, most people won't be engaging in workloads that make use of the absurd power consumption for a performance increase that can best be described as 'margin of error', but the fact that it is possible to use that much power is just ridiculous!

    This will be yet another example of marketing overriding basic common-sense.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Fascinating! I would have said more of a yawn fest!! I mean, these CPU's are ridiculous. 70w extra for 200mhz!? MEH
    What 70W?! It'a 160W more...
    Max Turbo Power (W)
    253
    410
    But in reality both will have the exact same 253W limit. (That everybody will ignore. )
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Some one need to make a Heat sink case to put this bad boy to work.
    How much weight you need? about 15kg of pure cooper
    Reply
  • TheHerald
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Fascinating! I would have said more of a yawn fest!! I mean, these CPU's are ridiculous. 70w extra for 200mhz!? MEH
    I think you are looking at it the wrong way. It's not 70w extra for 200 MHz, it's 70 watts less for the same MHz. Meaning, it will be considerably more efficient than the 13900k at same clockspeeds. Im thinking about buying the 14900ks for the efficiency alone, it will crazy good. Locked to 5.5 ghz it will probably pull 100 watts less than the 13900k
    Reply
  • TheHerald
    Neilbob said:
    There are some people who haunt this place who will try and justify products like this until they're blue not only in the face but also in other extremities too.

    But this doesn't change the fact that the darn thing is just stupid. Sure, most people won't be engaging in workloads that make use of the absurd power consumption for a performance increase that can best be described as 'margin of error', but the fact that it is possible to use that much power is just ridiculous!

    This will be yet another example of marketing overriding basic common-sense.
    Whats wrong with being able to use as much power as humanly possible? You realize you don't need to run it at 600 watts, 500 watts, 400 watts, right? You realize you can limit it to 200 watts and have the same performance as the 13900k at 300 watts, right? Right?
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    TerryLaze said:
    What 70W?! It'a 160W more...

    But in reality both will have the exact same 253W limit. (That everybody will ignore. )
    :ROFLMAO: That was a typo. Not sure where I got 70 from.
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    TheHerald said:
    Whats wrong with being able to use as much power as humanly possible? You realize you don't need to run it at 600 watts, 500 watts, 400 watts, right? You realize you can limit it to 200 watts and have the same performance as the 13900k at 300 watts, right? Right?
    I hesitated to respond to you because I'm sure it is a pointless exercise in this echo chamber you seem to have going on (22 posts in less than 24 hours almost all in rebuttal of any critique of xx900k/ks products), but whatever...

    To be clear I've been critical of the power consumption of not just Intel, but AMD and Nvidia too. I wasn't born yesterday; I am perfectly well aware that efficiency of these products generally increases as you drop back down the clock-speed and wattage scale, but you seem to overlook the fact that, just like overclocking, the VAST majority of people using these things will not underclock/undervolt etc. and will be running them as they come out of the box and depending on the motherboard: with their atrocious power-guzzling characteristics. Not all countries have such affordable energy that those characteristics don't quite cost a lot over time.

    There are countless articles regarding processors, including right here, showing that default Intel (to stress again, what most people will be using) is just bad when it comes to power usage with more than one or two cores. Default AMD (not X3D) are less excessive, but still pretty bad. There's no way you can deny either of these points, there's a ton of coverage all over the place.
    Reply