Intel's stock drops 30% overnight —company sheds $39 billion in market cap
Tough times ahead.
Intel's stock dropped around 30% overnight, shaving some $39 billion from the company's market capitalization since rumors of a pending layoff first emerged. The devastating results come after the chip giant reported a loss for the second quarter, complained about yield issues with the Meteor Lake CPU, provided a modest business outlook for the next few quarters, and announced plans to lay off 15,000 people worldwide.
When the NYSE closed on July 31, Intel's market capitalization was $130.86 billion. Then, a report about Intel's massive layoffs was published, and the company's market capitalization dropped sharply to $123.96 billion on August 1. Following Intel's financial report yesterday, the company's capitalization dropped to $91.86 billion. Essentially, Intel has lost half of its capitalization since January. As of now, Intel's market value is a fraction of Nvidia's worth and less than half of AMD's.
As Intel's actions look rather desperate, analysts believe that Intel's challenges are existential. "Intel's issues are now approaching the existential," said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst with Bernstein, told Reuters.
Indeed. Intel is fighting numerous rivals. On the one side, it is competing against AMD, Nvidia, and now Qualcomm for revenue share in the consumer PC market. For now, Intel outsells all three companies easily in this market, though Nvidia's gaming business looks to be more profitable.
On the other side, the company competes against AMD, Nvidia, and Arm chips in the data center space. Thanks to Nvidia's highly popular AI GPUs, Nvidia outsells AMD and Intel combined by nearly 3.3 times. But TSMC is arguably the biggest fight for Intel. The Taiwanese company makes chips for all of Intel's rivals and Intel itself.
On the roadmap side, Intel looks quite competitive both in terms of performance and, eventually, in terms of costs. Yet, the company has to prove that it can make money making chips not only for itself, but for others. To do so, it needs to persuade TSMC's customers to use Intel's technologies, which isn't easy given that the Taiwan foundry can efficiently produce chips with great yields.
Rasgon believes that under different circumstances, there might be discussions about the company's viability. However, Intel could boost its balance sheet by $40 billion by 2025 through its current actions, subsidies, and partner contributions, ensuring its survival in some form.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
"Intel will survive (in some form) to continue the fight," Rasgon told Reuters.
Intel reported $12.8 billion in revenue for Q2 2024 and faced a substantial loss of $1.6 billion, a significant drop from a $1.5 billion profit in Q2 2023.
Looking ahead, Intel's projections for the third quarter of 2024 are concerning. The company anticipates revenue between $12.5 billion and $13.5 billion, which would be approximately $1.2 billion less than the revenue reported in Q3 2023 and just a bit higher at the midpoint than in Q2 2024. Although the company's product divisions make a profit, the company's Intel Foundry manufacturing arm lost $2.8 billion in the second quarter alone. As the company does not expect a rapid recovery, it decided to lay off some 15,000 personnel to reduce its costs.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Technofuzz It's almost like they didn't innovate or increase core counts for a decade because they had no competition. Sitting on your laurels only gets you one thing in the business world...disaster.Reply -
SonoraTechnical I really didn't think I'd see the day where Intel would falter this badly. They owned desktop, server, and mobil CPUs forever... Just stayed on CoreDuo with larger processes for too long without any major innovation or quality breakthroughs.Reply
I'd like to see them recover. They keep AMD and Apple honest. Of course now the existential threats are coming from other players too.
Well, anyway.. This round I'll be building a Zen5/RDNA4 rig... so skipping Intel and nVidia. -
vanadiel007 As I mentioned in another thread: The issue with the crashing CPU's will cost them a lot of stock value, so they should look at a recall rather than anything else, as a recall might be cheaper.Reply
This CPU crashing might not affect them much this time around, but next quarters they will for sure. -
vanadiel007 Technofuzz said:It's almost like they didn't innovate or increase core counts for a decade because they had no competition. Sitting on your laurels only gets you one thing in the business world...disaster.
They had competition, but their marketing department was very good at explaining you needed an Intel CPU for gaming to a point where a lot of people went Intel simply because of the marketing hype. -
WDPowell
Didn't they also strip hyperthreading from i7s at one point? One page I found pointed to them doing it to the i7-9700K.Technofuzz said:It's almost like they didn't innovate or increase core counts for a decade because they had no competition. Sitting on your laurels only gets you one thing in the business world...disaster.
When greed and setting on your laurels catches up to you. -
Eximo
More of a production distinction at the time. 9700K vs 9900K. 8700K had hyperthreading, but only six cores.WDPowell said:Didn't they also strip hyperthreading from i7s at one point? One page I found pointed to them doing it to the i7-9700K.
When greed and setting on your laurels catches up to you.
In some regards the non hyperthreading chips of that time were the best. Avoided most of the side channel attacks. -
DS426
Agreed and agreed. They used to be the seemingly unstoppable behemoth to beat, especially with most of the corporate world being married to Intel with AMD never getting nearly as much traction as they have now.SonoraTechnical said:I really didn't think I'd see the day where Intel would falter this badly. They owned desktop, server, and mobil CPUs forever... Just stayed on CoreDuo with larger processes for too long without any major innovation or quality breakthroughs.
I'd like to see them recover. They keep AMD and Apple honest. Of course now the existential threats are coming from other players too.
Well, anyway.. This round I'll be building a Zen5/RDNA4 rig... so skipping Intel and nVidia.
Yep, looks like Zen 5 pricing is very aggressive. Hopefully the same will be true of RDNA4, or even if launch MSRP's are about the same but with good gen-on-gen performance uplift, the increased value will be appreciated.