PC makers take different approaches to honoring Intel's extended warranty for CPU crashing issues — survey shows disparity between warranty periods

iBUYPOWER Father's Day Gaming PC Deals
(Image credit: Future)

The Verge reached out to multiple PC makers to inquire about how they will handle Intel's warranty extension for 13th- and 14th-gen processors regarding the instability issues.

Intel released extended warranty details for 13th- and 14th-gen chips affected by the instability issue, listing 22 SKUs in total. Intel says that all listed Boxed Chips worldwide are covered by the two-year warranty extensions. But if you bought a tray processor or a pre-built system, you must coordinate with the retailer that supplied your chip for any return or replacement.

Since Intel left the decision to extend the warranty to each respective seller, it's interesting to see the policies of each major computer maker regarding the Intel warranty extension.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CompanyPolicy
AcerResponded, but no official update yet
Alienware / DellProcessors diagnosed with instability issue will be replaced "to ensure that all costs are covered", but no mention of warranty extension
AsusTwo-year extended warranty for affected desktop CPUs
Corsair / Origin PCFour-year total CPU warranty on 13th- and 14th-gen Intel processors from date of purchase
CyberPowerPCAutomated response sent link to standard one-year warranty for parts
Digital StormAll previous and new systems with Intel 13th- and 14th-gen CPU will include an extended five-year warranty coverage for the processor only
Falcon NorthwestIntel 13th- and 14th-gen desktop processors on Intel's list will now be covered for a full five years
HPWill honor Intel's extended warranty of two years on impacted processors
iBuypowerWill honor Intel's five-year extended warranty
LenovoNo response yet at the time of writing
MaingearWill be extending the processor warrant on all PCs equipped with affected 13th and 14th gen Intel Core processors to five years from the date of purchase, including delidded 14900KS processors
MSINo response yet at the time of writing
NZXTResponded, but no official update yet
Puget SystemsExtending our warranty on affected CPUS to 3 years for any customer affected by this issue, regardless of warranty purchased

These are some of the biggest PC makers whose responses have mostly been positive. Out of the 16 companies that have been surveyed, six said that they would honor the complete two-year extended warranty on the affected Intel processors, bringing the total coverage to five years. On the other hand, five companies gave some form of extended warranty, but not the whole five years from Intel, and an additional five are yet to reply or release an official statement at the time of writing.

We hope that every company that builds PCs using Intel chips comes up with a solid extended warranty policy. That way, its users do not have to worry about their chip crashing and burning right as its warranty ends.

Extending the warranty will incur additional costs for Intel and its OEM partners. However, it is also the one thing that Intel can do to help win back the trust and confidence of its customers. If Intel's partners care about its customers, they should give Intel users some assurance that they will not end up with an expensive brick on their desk after the warranty expires and not consider the extended warranty exclusively an Intel problem.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • -Fran-
    Shocker. Some will not extend their warranties. Who could have seen this coming?

    I hope people now learns the value of good warranty reputation when purchasing something. It's easy to forget how important it is for Companies to be good at selling good products, but excel when you need RMAs.

    As I always say: it doesn't matter how good you are normally, but when something bad happens.

    At least, Asus seems to have learned... I think...

    Regards.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    My buddy's year old laptop just failed. He took it to a local shop he says has a great record for wizardry - Best Buy just wanted him to send it back to the manufacturer (Lenovo). IMHO the shop gave him a bogus diagnosis, that failed, and now they just say "It's da motherboard". I have told buddy about these Raptor Crash issues, but it seems a bit beyond him.

    As far as I can tell the symptoms are that it just went dark and now won't boot.
    Does that fit the mode?
    He doesn't do anything heavy on it, afaik, he was using it for a zoom yoga lesson when it failed.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    CyberPowerPC: You are confusing us with a company that cares!
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Why do I foresee a round of high scoring overclocked Intel chips now that people can just claim they burned out due to Intel and not manual overclocking?
    Reply
  • das_stig
    Not surprised some companies not extending, it's all about costs and profits and can you blame them. Intel screwed up not them, Intel dropped the ball on communication, so it should be Intel that takes all the financial hit with dealing with RMA's.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    JRStern said:
    My buddy's year old laptop just failed. He took it to a local shop he says has a great record for wizardry - Best Buy just wanted him to send it back to the manufacturer (Lenovo). IMHO the shop gave him a bogus diagnosis, that failed, and now they just say "It's da motherboard". I have told buddy about these Raptor Crash issues, but it seems a bit beyond him.

    As far as I can tell the symptoms are that it just went dark and now won't boot.
    Does that fit the mode?
    He doesn't do anything heavy on it, afaik, he was using it for a zoom yoga lesson when it failed.
    No, it doesn't, because affected chips still boot; they crash when there is load on them, but they do in fact boot, and if this is the first issue, well...

    Also, did he try to get into BIOS at least?

    Actually does sound like a dead motherboard in your case and frankly, yes, send it back to Lenovo and let them deal with their problem. Not everything that goes wrong right now is this issue dude. And even if it is, what else should he do than send it in?
    Reply
  • JRStern
    KyaraM said:
    Actually does sound like a dead motherboard in your case and frankly, yes, send it back to Lenovo and let them deal with their problem. Not everything that goes wrong right now is this issue dude. And even if it is, what else should he do than send it in?
    What turned him off was they said there was a four-week turnaound.
    I thought there might be expedited service available, but he didn't look for it, he really trusts this local shop.
    I doubt it, but it's his problem.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    JRStern said:
    What turned him off was they said there was a four-week turnaound.
    I thought there might be expedited service available, but he didn't look for it, he really trusts this local shop.
    I doubt it, but it's his problem.
    Warranty claims take as long as they do. What would you have done differently anyway? What do you mean by expedited service anyway?
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    JRStern said:
    What turned him off was they said there was a four-week turnaound.
    I thought there might be expedited service available, but he didn't look for it, he really trusts this local shop.
    I doubt it, but it's his problem.
    I have another question. Is your friend's laptop, by chance, a Lenovo LOQ? Asking because the Intel version of that laptop has pretty bad motherboard issues, as I found out a few minutes ago.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    KyaraM said:
    I have another question. Is your friend's laptop, by chance, a Lenovo LOQ? Asking because the Intel version of that laptop has pretty bad motherboard issues, as I found out a few minutes ago.
    Don't know, I'll ask. Thanks.
    Anything more specific on those issues?
    Reply