Gigabyte RX 9070 XT thermal gel replacement reportedly lowers VRAM temperatures by 7 degrees

Aorus Radeon RX 9070 XT Elite 16G
(Image credit: Bilibili/DIY电脑周边)
7

Bilibili content creator and thermal pad vendor DIY电脑周边 (via Uniko's Hardware) has a video explaining how to replace Gigabyte's server-grade thermal conductive gel with standard thermal pads, using the Aorus Radeon RX 9070 XT Elite 16G as an example. A customer allegedly sent in the graphics card for a cooling upgrade and got precisely what they requested.

Gigabyte began incorporating thermal conductive gel in its latest AMD and Nvidia gaming graphics cards. However, this putty-like thermal compound received negative feedback due to instances of leakage from some graphics cards, particularly when installed vertically. Following a swift investigation, Gigabyte acknowledged that early production runs had experienced issues with excessive application of the thermal gel. The company has reassured customers that the amount of thermal gel used in the graphics cards has been modified to prevent such problems in the future. The Aorus Radeon RX 9070 XT Elite 16G also features thermal gel, possibly influencing the consumer's decision to switch to conventional thermal pads.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    So they used a gel that was supposed to be superior to pads yet is inferior...Talk about inventing a problem where none existed.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I've read that thermal gel/putty works better than pads, so it sounds like either gigabyte designed something wrong, used the incorrect type of gel, or the gel they used was counterfeit.
    With Gigabyte's history with GPUs... they all seem likely.
    Reply
  • Jabberwocky79
    This is my card, and I probably have an early unit since I won the opportunity to buy it in the Newegg lottery when the card was first released. Haven't seen any gel creep yet, and temps are fine. But I'll be disassembling it anyhow once I get my waterblock for it.
    Reply
  • YSCCC
    Jabberwocky79 said:
    This is my card, and I probably have an early unit since I won the opportunity to buy it in the Newegg lottery when the card was first released. Haven't seen any gel creep yet, and temps are fine. But I'll be disassembling it anyhow once I get my waterblock for it.
    Did you mount it vertically or horizontally? real shame that it performs so much worse with putty
    Reply
  • Jabberwocky79
    YSCCC said:
    Did you mount it vertically or horizontally? real shame that it performs so much worse with putty
    Vertically. It's "in" a wall-mounted, open air chassis on the wall above my head.
    Reply
  • santis1982
    Hi @Jabberwocky79, I have the same GPU and looking to WC it also. Which waterblock did you get?
    Reply
  • Jabberwocky79
    santis1982 said:
    Hi @Jabberwocky79, I have the same GPU and looking to WC it also. Which waterblock did you get?
    As far as I know, there's only one option that's been developed so far. It's still a few weeks away from availability, but they are accepting preorders for it:

    https://shop.alphacool.com/en/shop/gpu-water-cooling/amd/14780-alphacool-core-rx-9070-xt-aorus-elite-with-backplate
    There may be other options coming to market, but I am unaware of them. I'm already an Alphacool guy so I stopped looking for other options once they announced it.
    Reply