Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 up close: Blackwell RTX Workstation, Max-Q Workstation, and Server variants shown

Nvidia RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell GPUs
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Nvidia Blackwell RTX Pro 6000 GPU was announced during the GTC 2025 keynote. These will use the same GB202 die that goes into Nvidia's RTX 5090 graphics card, but with some significant changes in some of the other aspects. There will be three variants of the RTX Pro 6000: the Blackwell Workstation Edition, Max-Q Workstation Edition, and Blackwell Server Edition.

The core specifications for the RTX Pro 6000 are the same across all three models. You get 188 SMs enabled, out of a potential 192 maximum from GB202. That's 10.6% more SMs, shader cores, tensor cores, RT cores, etc., relative to the RTX 5090. Clock speeds weren't given, but Nvidia does list up to 125 TFLOPS of FP32 compute via the shaders, and 4000 AI TOPS from the tensor cores. That works out to a boost clock of around 2.6 GHz, but that won't be the same for all three variants.

The RTX Pro 6000 features the full 128MB L2 cache of GB202, along with four NVENC and four NVDEC video blocks. RTX 5090 only has 96MB of L2 cache and three each for NVENC/NVDEC. It's very close to a fully enabled chip, with only 2% of the SMs disabled.

The memory configuration is the same for all three variants. As discussed in the initial RTX Pro 6000 announcement, Nvidia uses 24Gb (3GB) GDDR7 chips rather than the 2GB chips used on the consumer GeForce RTX 50-series cards. That increases the memory capacity to 48GB per PCB side, and with chips on both sides of the PCB in 'clamshell' mode, there's 96GB total. The memory has the same 28 Gbps clocks as most of the 50-series parts, with 1792 GB/s of total bandwidth.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Nvidia RTX Pro Specifications

Graphics Card

RTX Pro 6000

RTX Pro 5000

RTX Pro 4500

RTX Pro 4000

Architecture

GB202

GB202

GB203

GB203

Process Technology

TSMC 4N

TSMC 4N

TSMC 4N

TSMC 4N

Transistors (Billion)

92.2

92.2

45.6

45.6

Die size (mm^2)

750

750

378

378

SMs

188

110

82

70

GPU Shaders (ALUs)

24064

14080

10496

8960

Tensor Cores

752

440

328

280

Ray Tracing Cores

188

110

82

70

Boost Clock (MHz)

2600

2500?

2500?

2500?

VRAM Speed (Gbps)

28

28

28

28?

VRAM (GB)

96

48

32

24

VRAM Bus Width

512

384

256

192

L2 Cache

128

96?

64?

48?

Render Output Units

192

144?

96?

80?

Texture Mapping Units

752

440

328

280

TFLOPS FP32 (Boost)

125.1

70.4?

52.5?

44.8?

TFLOPS FP16 (FP4/FP8 TFLOPS)

1001 (4004)

563 (2253) ?

420 (1679) ?

358 (1434) ?

Bandwidth (GB/s)

1792

1344

896

672?

TBP (watts)

600

300

200

140

Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • klatte42
    Is there no information about memory, or is it just the same as a 5090?
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    klatte42 said:
    Is there no information about memory, or is it just the same as a 5090?
    There's a whole bunch of information about the memory... that I only put in the initial announcement (which is linked in the first sentence). I've repeated that here now, with some additional information. Cheers!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Probably the most interesting change vs. previous generations is going above the 300 W barrier. To my knowledge, that's a first for their workstation cards.
    Reply
  • Li Ken-un
    bit_user said:
    Probably the most interesting change vs. previous generations is going above the 300 W barrier.
    I’m going to stick with 300 W since that is still an option.

    For the Max-Q Workstation Edition, the TGP gets capped at 300W. Half the power will naturally mean lower typical boost clocks for a lot of workloads, though
    …that also means not rolling the 🎲 die on potential connector meltage.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Li Ken-un said:
    I’m going to stick with 300 W since that is still an option.


    …that also means not rolling the 🎲 die on potential connector meltage.
    Workstations don't typically skimp on materials quality. I suspect a large number of melting connectors have been more about contamination of the metal connections (along with some incorrectly inserted connectors). Have there been any reports of melted 16-pin connectors from servers? Because they're using the same connector there as the consumer cards, but I've heard basically nothing about problems from that sector.

    Crazy to think about the servers shown where there are eight RTX Pro 6000 cards lined up. 4800W right there! LOL
    Reply
  • jp7189
    In servers and workstations cable routing and air flow tend to be more engineered/controlled. Technically, the 16AWG wire used on the 16pin connectors can go up to 18 amps if you're willing to have a 90C tolerance. That's 1296 watts, and plenty of safety factor IF all parts of the path are designed for it (high temp insulation, good cable routing, air flow over every part of it)
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    Li Ken-un said:
    …that also means not rolling the 🎲 die on potential connector meltage.
    In the server market these issues dont arise. You have IT people that actually know what they are doing and take the time to install things properly and have the proper power and cooling.

    The cable melting issue were due to user error and power supplies that were not adequate.
    Reply
  • Li Ken-un
    Loadedaxe said:
    In the server market these issues dont arise. You have IT people that actually know what they are doing and take the time to install things properly and have the proper power and cooling.
    You see though… I’m not an IT team. I’m another individual installing a GPU in a typical desktop tower form factor, who likes neatly organized cables, and so has a collection of customized cables that are snipped to just the right length.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Li Ken-un said:
    I’m another individual installing a GPU in a typical desktop tower form factor, who likes neatly organized cables, and so has a collection of customized cables that are snipped to just the right length.
    Wow, I'm impressed!

    I once bought a cable sleeving kit to put sleeves over my PSU cables (before this was standard, on higher-end PSUs), but it was such a PITA that I vowed never to do it again. Luckily, the industry embraced the style and I didn't have to.

    In that machine, I also tried installing special noise-dampening foam on the inside of the case (like the DynaMat stuff sold to car stereo enthusiasts), but I can't say it made much difference. It's better to simply start with a case that's designed to be quiet. Also, I positioned my PC farther away from where I sit.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    Li Ken-un said:
    You see though… I’m not an IT team. I’m another individual installing a GPU in a typical desktop tower form factor, who likes neatly organized cables, and so has a collection of customized cables that are snipped to just the right length.
    And there are a lot of people just like you, I used to be one, takes too much time though and I lost interest as no one saw my pc except me and I dont need to impress myself.

    But most that do, they usually do it correctly. Then there are some not so technically inclined. That isn't the fault of Nvidia. And they definitely need a crack in the knees to knock them down a notch, but this isn't it.

    Still, your original comment was the "rolling the dice" on server gpu being installed that the average consumer is not going to buy, those that do buy, they know how to RTFM. ;)
    Reply