WD's new HDMR tech to enable record-breaking 100TB+ drives

(Image credit: Western Digital)

Western Digital is set to introduce its first hard drives featuring heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology, and around 2030, this technology will enable the company to build 80TB–100TB HDDs. At that point, FePt-based granular media will start reaching its limits in terms of areal density. But Western Digital is already working on the next step for its hard drives: heat dot magnetic recording (HDMR) technology.

The HDMR is a next-generation recording technology that involves heat-assisted writing and bit-patterned media (BPM) that promises to achieve areal densities of around 8 Tb/inch^2 and beyond (according to Seagate) and to enable 10-platter HDDs with capacities of 120TB or higher. This technology is projected to be quite expensive as bit-patterned disks must be physically patterned using lithography or etching equipment in cleanrooms. Let us talk about this development in more detail.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • maxx42
    80TB, 100TB...For home users/consumers, that's a lot of data to lose if a drive fails. Or a lot of data to mirror, checksum, etc. to back up, which will take a LONG time
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    maxx42 said:
    80TB, 100TB...For home users/consumers, that's a lot of data to lose if a drive fails. Or a lot of data to mirror, checksum, etc. to back up, which will take a LONG time

    True this. So... that means we don't use large drives if we need the space? And if you don't need the space, clearly you don't go there.

    Three in unraid including 2 parity drives would be relatively safe.

    Last I checked, all data is only getting bigger. Not smaller.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    concern is how large can we actually go on HDD as would you be able to rebuild it before the time limit is up?
    Reply
  • truerock
    maxx42 said:
    80TB, 100TB...For home users/consumers, that's a lot of data to lose if a drive fails. Or a lot of data to mirror, checksum, etc. to back up, which will take a LONG time
    My old PC had: 1TB SSD, 12TB HDD, 6TB HDD

    My new PC that I built this year: 4TB SSD, 8TB SSD, 8TB HDD, 8TB HDD

    It was very difficult to do full backups of the 12TB HDD. I'll probably never buy a HDD larger than 8TB in the future.

    Also, it was expensive - but, I did purchase that 8TB SSD. For a home PC - it will be great when I can stop using HDDs and use only SSDs

    About 12 years ago, I was a product manager for data backup for a large multi-national corporation.
    Back in those days, the tape had to be re-copied every 2 years to make sure it was still readable.
    The project I managed was converting all the tape backup to HDD backup.
    I'm guessing all of the tape storage probably no longer exists in 2025.

    I'm guessing if I still had that job today, we would be converting a lot of the data-backup infrastructure to SSDs. But, even today - there are applications for 100TB HDDs
    Reply
  • markhahn
    maxx42 said:
    80TB, 100TB...For home users/consumers, that's a lot of data to lose if a drive fails. Or a lot of data to mirror, checksum, etc. to back up, which will take a LONG time
    Afaik home users haven't been a big part of the HD market for some years now.

    At least not a direct part: consumer cloud storage is still spinning rust (indeed, sometimes sliding rust - tape).

    The really interesting point here is the hat most data is quite cold: sometimes write-once-read-never, or at least not much is actually hot. And the fairly compact hot/warm stuff does just great on flash (which will always be several times more expensive by capacity).
    Reply
  • markhahn
    hotaru251 said:
    concern is how large can we actually go on HDD as would you be able to rebuild it before the time limit is up?
    Think of it more like tape, and recognize that these drives will almost always be part of a bigger system which manages resilvering, and which also contains lower-latency components.
    Reply
  • lmcnabney
    It doesn't matter because the price per TB won't go down. HDD will be priced like GPUs.
    Reply
  • King_V
    If you thought disk defragmenting took a long time before...

    ... and I'll show myself out now.
    Reply
  • pug_s
    I am skeptical of this. 10 years ago, HD makers can only do 2TB per platter, and now it is 3. Hard drive size got bigger because they put more platters and stuffed Helium in the drive.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    SomeoneElse23 said:
    Three in unraid including 2 parity drives would be relatively safe.
    Building an Unraid array or running a parity check with a 100TB parity drive would take over a week. That's not very practical.
    Reply