Corsair MP700 Elite SSD review: The retail, budget PCIe 5.0 SSD of choice is officially here

Corsair is quick off the line with a practical next-gen drive

Corsair MP700 Elite SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Corsair MP700 Elite is the kind of drive we want to see, leveraging cutting-edge technology to provide unprecedented performance and efficiency for a PCIe 5.0 SSD, without the need for a heatsink.

Pros

  • +

    Good all-around performance

  • +

    High power efficiency

  • +

    Relatively cool-running

Cons

  • -

    Limited capacity options

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Corsair MP700 Elite delivers on the possibilities promised in our Phison E31T preview. It's one of the first of what will surely be many retail products using the controller and NAND combination. Most importantly, it's here now and you can hold it in your hands — or put it into a PC where it belongs. The Corsair MP700 Elite comes from a combination of efforts, with Phison delivering a production 7nm 'N7' SSD controller and Kioxia via its high-speed BiCS8 flash. The result is a powerful, efficient, and optimistic sign of things to come in the storage space.

The MP700 Elite is an exciting product not only because it treads new ground, but because it does it simply and effectively. Corsair is sticking to the most popular capacities and keeping the heatsink as an option. It's a continuation of the company’s SSD strategy of focusing on what sells well, combined with getting new technology out to the public as early as possible. There's room for some improvements with the follow-through, particularly in getting the website updated, getting stock to resellers more quickly, and setting drive prices at a reasonable place in a more timely fashion. But Corsair has generally nailed getting the right products out there, and it just needs to do that more smoothly.

We'll see many more drives like the MP700 Elite from competitors, including the contemporaneous Addlink G55 that's also on our testbench. Corsair comes with a reputable brand name and a willingness to stay relevant in the SSD market. We think this technology is the future as it combines high performance with high power efficiency in a svelte, single-sided design. There’s little not to like about the MP700 Elite, although it doesn’t quite fulfill all storage roles and we’d like to see a 4TB SKU.

 Corsair MP700 Elite  Specifications

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

With contributions from
  • HideOut
    all th is talk about power effeciency, and no graphs or other data to suppport it?
    Reply
  • phxrider
    What am I missing? From what I see, it's barely faster than the PCIe 4 drives, and more expensive. Actually, it's even more expensive than the higher end, better performing Teamgroup 540.
    Reply
  • Mama Changa
    phxrider said:
    What am I missing? From what I see, it's barely faster than the PCIe 4 drives, and more expensive. Actually, it's even more expensive than the higher end, better performing Teamgroup 540.
    Well, the author did say prices were way too high.

    I'd get the T500 ahead of this.
    Reply
  • Maxxify
    HideOut said:
    all th is talk about power effeciency, and no graphs or other data to suppport it?
    682.4 MB/s per watt. This is over 50% more efficient than the 2TB Gold P31, if that puts things into perspective.
    Reply
  • Stomx
    phxrider said:
    What am I missing? From what I see, it's barely faster than the PCIe 4 drives, and more expensive. Actually, it's even more expensive than the higher end, better performing Teamgroup 540.
    When older gen 4.0 drives deliver 7+ GB/s this one with 8.5 does not look particularly attractive
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Maxxify said:
    682.4 MB/s per watt. This is over 50% more efficient than the 2TB Gold P31, if that puts things into perspective.
    I'd like to know how well it does when limited to PCIe 4.0 or 3.0 speeds. There are plenty of systems out there that only support up to PCIe 3.0 and the P31 Gold is a PCIe 3.0 drive.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Stomx said:
    When older gen 4.0 drives deliver 7+ GB/s this one with 8.5 does not look particularly attractive
    What I find more alarming is the QD1 read performance vs. block size:

    The graph doesn't say, but I'm assuming this is random reads. It falls way behind after 4k and doesn't really catch up until 1M.

    I'd also like to see how random read performance scales vs. queue depth at 4k, 64k, and 1M sizes. If we had that, we wouldn't need the bar charts showing the same data points.

    I think less emphasis could be placed on write benchmarking. Obviously, there needs to be some, but why do I care about peak sequential write at QD8? Who would do that? Why? And do you not see that graph is almost exactly the same as the peak sequential write at QD1?

    @JarredWaltonGPU
    Reply
  • Maxxify
    bit_user said:
    I'd like to know how well it does when limited to PCIe 4.0 or 3.0 speeds. There are plenty of systems out there that only support up to PCIe 3.0 and the P31 Gold is a PCIe 3.0 drive.
    Should be even more efficient. Would be cool to see it tested at lower PCIe speeds.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Maxxify said:
    Should be even more efficient. Would be cool to see it tested at lower PCIe speeds.
    Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if it were more efficient, but I really don't know how much of its efficiency advantage comes from higher speeds vs. lower power. That's why I'm wondering.

    FWIW, I find bandwidth per Watt a slightly weird metric, when buying a drive for personal use. I care about performance and power. However, depending on what I'm doing, I'll tend to prioritize one above the other. If it's for a gaming desktop, I'd care about performance first and I'd probably only use power as a tie-breaker. For something like a laptop, I'd prioritize power but probably not to extent that I'd accept a major performance tradeoff.

    You could have two drives with virtually identical perf/W, but very different performance and power levels. I think the metric is basically useless, outside of datacenter applications. Even then, what you'd probably rather see is the number of Joules required to complete a defined workload.
    Reply
  • snapdragon-x
    Where is the Addlink G55 review? So, it's essentially the same product? It's 25% less expensive than the Corsair one where I live.
    Reply